Sinem Nihal Esatoglu1, Ibrahim Hatemi2, Yesim Ozguler1, Gulen Hatemi3, Hafize Uzun4, Aykut Ferhat Celik2, Hasan Yazici1. 1. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey. gulenhatemi@yahoo.com. 4. Department of Biochemistry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The faecal calprotectin (FC) test is widely used as a non-invasive method for identifying intestinal inflammation. A recent study suggested FC may help to diagnose gastrointestinal involvement of Behçet's syndrome (GIBS). We aimed to determine whether FC helps to distinguish active from inactive intestinal involvement in GIBS. METHODS: We tried to contact 70 GIBS patients registered in our tertiary multidisciplinary clinic. We prospectively collected faecal specimens and serum from 39 GIBS patients who gave informed consent assessing calprotectin and CRP levels followed by a colonoscopy. We included 47 Crohn's disease (CD) patients as controls. Active disease was defined as having ulcer/s on colonoscopy. We filled the Disease Activity Index for Intestinal Behçet's Disease (DAIBD) and Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI). The cut-off for positive FC was defined as ≥150 μg/g. RESULTS: Ulcers were detected in 12/39 GIBS patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the FC test for active disease was 91.7 (95%CI:61.5-99.8) and 74.1% (95%CI:53.7-88.9). Median FC and CRP levels and DAIBD scores were higher among patients with ulcers, whereas serum calprotectin and CDAI scores were not. A negative FC test was the only significant predictor of remission (OR:37.04, 95%CI:2.4-561.6; p=0.009) on multivariate analysis. Among CD patients, 16/25 active patients and 3/22 patients in endoscopic remission had a positive FC test (OR:11, 95%CI:11-49). CONCLUSIONS: FC, but not serum calprotectin seems to be a useful non-invasive tool for assessing disease activity in GIBS. Whether the presence of oral ulcers can cause false positive results remains to be studied.
OBJECTIVES: The faecal calprotectin (FC) test is widely used as a non-invasive method for identifying intestinal inflammation. A recent study suggested FC may help to diagnose gastrointestinal involvement of Behçet's syndrome (GIBS). We aimed to determine whether FC helps to distinguish active from inactive intestinal involvement in GIBS. METHODS: We tried to contact 70 GIBS patients registered in our tertiary multidisciplinary clinic. We prospectively collected faecal specimens and serum from 39 GIBS patients who gave informed consent assessing calprotectin and CRP levels followed by a colonoscopy. We included 47 Crohn's disease (CD) patients as controls. Active disease was defined as having ulcer/s on colonoscopy. We filled the Disease Activity Index for Intestinal Behçet's Disease (DAIBD) and Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI). The cut-off for positive FC was defined as ≥150 μg/g. RESULTS:Ulcers were detected in 12/39 GIBS patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the FC test for active disease was 91.7 (95%CI:61.5-99.8) and 74.1% (95%CI:53.7-88.9). Median FC and CRP levels and DAIBD scores were higher among patients with ulcers, whereas serum calprotectin and CDAI scores were not. A negative FC test was the only significant predictor of remission (OR:37.04, 95%CI:2.4-561.6; p=0.009) on multivariate analysis. Among CDpatients, 16/25 active patients and 3/22 patients in endoscopic remission had a positive FC test (OR:11, 95%CI:11-49). CONCLUSIONS:FC, but not serum calprotectin seems to be a useful non-invasive tool for assessing disease activity in GIBS. Whether the presence of oral ulcers can cause false positive results remains to be studied.
Authors: Eun Ae Kang; Jung Won Park; Min Soo Cho; Jae Hee Cheon; Yehyun Park; Soo Jung Park; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 3.067