Geetika Bajpai1, Andrea Bredemeyer1, Wenjun Li2, Konstantin Zaitsev3, Andrew L Koenig1, Inessa Lokshina1, Jayaram Mohan1, Brooke Ivey1, His-Min Hsiao2, Carla Weinheimer1, Attila Kovacs1, Slava Epelman4, Maxim Artyomov3, Daniel Kreisel2,3, Kory J Lavine1,2,3,5. 1. From the Department of Medicine (G.B., A.B., A.L. Koenig, I.L., J.M., B.I., C.W., A. Kovacs, K.J.L.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 2. Department of Surgery (W.L., H.-M.H., D.K., K.J.L.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 3. Department of Immunology and Pathology (K.Z., M.A., D.K., K.J.L.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 4. Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, University Health Network, ON, Canada (S.E.). 5. Department of Developmental Biology (K.J.L.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Recent advancements have brought to light the origins, complexity, and functions of tissue-resident macrophages. However, in the context of tissue injury or disease, large numbers of monocytes infiltrate the heart and are thought to contribute to adverse remodeling and heart failure pathogenesis. Little is understood about the diversity of monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages recruited to the heart after myocardial injury, including the mechanisms that regulate monocyte recruitment and fate specification. OBJECTIVE: We sought to test the hypothesis that distinct subsets of tissue-resident CCR2- (C-C chemokine receptor 2) and CCR2+ macrophages orchestrate monocyte recruitment and fate specification after myocardial injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reveal that in numerous mouse models of cardiomyocyte cell death (permanent myocardial infarction, reperfused myocardial infarction, and diphtheria toxin cardiomyocyte ablation), there is a shift in macrophage ontogeny whereby tissue-resident macrophages are predominately replaced by infiltrating monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages. Using syngeneic cardiac transplantation to model ischemia-reperfusion injury and distinguish tissue-resident from recruited cell populations in combination with intravital 2-photon microscopy, we demonstrate that monocyte recruitment is differentially orchestrated by distinct subsets of tissue-resident cardiac macrophages. Tissue-resident CCR2+ macrophages promote monocyte recruitment through an MYD88 (myeloid differentiation primary response 88)-dependent mechanism that results in release of MCPs (monocyte chemoattractant proteins) and monocyte mobilization. In contrast, tissue-resident CCR2- macrophages inhibit monocyte recruitment. Using CD (cluster of differentiation) 169-DTR (diphtheria toxin receptor) and CCR2-DTR mice, we further show that selective depletion of either tissue-resident CCR2- or CCR2+ macrophages before myocardial infarction results in divergent effects on left ventricular function, myocardial remodeling, and monocyte recruitment. Finally, using single-cell RNA sequencing, we show that tissue-resident cardiac macrophages differentially instruct monocyte fate specification. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these observations establish the mechanistic basis by which monocytes are initially recruited to the injured heart and provide new insights into the heterogeneity of monocyte-derived macrophages.
RATIONALE: Recent advancements have brought to light the origins, complexity, and functions of tissue-resident macrophages. However, in the context of tissue injury or disease, large numbers of monocytes infiltrate the heart and are thought to contribute to adverse remodeling and heart failure pathogenesis. Little is understood about the diversity of monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages recruited to the heart after myocardial injury, including the mechanisms that regulate monocyte recruitment and fate specification. OBJECTIVE: We sought to test the hypothesis that distinct subsets of tissue-resident CCR2- (C-C chemokine receptor 2) and CCR2+ macrophages orchestrate monocyte recruitment and fate specification after myocardial injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reveal that in numerous mouse models of cardiomyocyte cell death (permanent myocardial infarction, reperfused myocardial infarction, and diphtheria toxin cardiomyocyte ablation), there is a shift in macrophage ontogeny whereby tissue-resident macrophages are predominately replaced by infiltrating monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages. Using syngeneic cardiac transplantation to model ischemia-reperfusion injury and distinguish tissue-resident from recruited cell populations in combination with intravital 2-photon microscopy, we demonstrate that monocyte recruitment is differentially orchestrated by distinct subsets of tissue-resident cardiac macrophages. Tissue-resident CCR2+ macrophages promote monocyte recruitment through an MYD88 (myeloid differentiation primary response 88)-dependent mechanism that results in release of MCPs (monocyte chemoattractant proteins) and monocyte mobilization. In contrast, tissue-resident CCR2- macrophages inhibit monocyte recruitment. Using CD (cluster of differentiation) 169-DTR (diphtheria toxin receptor) and CCR2-DTR mice, we further show that selective depletion of either tissue-resident CCR2- or CCR2+ macrophages before myocardial infarction results in divergent effects on left ventricular function, myocardial remodeling, and monocyte recruitment. Finally, using single-cell RNA sequencing, we show that tissue-resident cardiac macrophages differentially instruct monocyte fate specification. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these observations establish the mechanistic basis by which monocytes are initially recruited to the injured heart and provide new insights into the heterogeneity of monocyte-derived macrophages.
Authors: Stefan Göser; Renate Ottl; Alexander Brodner; Thomas J Dengler; Jan Torzewski; Kensuke Egashira; Noel R Rose; Hugo A Katus; Ziya Kaya Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-11-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Anja M van der Laan; Alexander Hirsch; Lourens F H J Robbers; Robin Nijveldt; Ingrid Lommerse; Ronak Delewi; Pieter A van der Vleuten; Bart J Biemond; Jaap Jan Zwaginga; Wim J van der Giessen; Felix Zijlstra; Albert C van Rossum; Carlijn Voermans; C Ellen van der Schoot; Jan J Piek Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Slava Epelman; Kory J Lavine; Anna E Beaudin; Dorothy K Sojka; Javier A Carrero; Boris Calderon; Thaddeus Brija; Emmanuel L Gautier; Stoyan Ivanov; Ansuman T Satpathy; Joel D Schilling; Reto Schwendener; Ismail Sergin; Babak Razani; E Camilla Forsberg; Wayne M Yokoyama; Emil R Unanue; Marco Colonna; Gwendalyn J Randolph; Douglas L Mann Journal: Immunity Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Maulik D Majmudar; Edmund J Keliher; Timo Heidt; Florian Leuschner; Jessica Truelove; Brena F Sena; Rostic Gorbatov; Yoshiko Iwamoto; Partha Dutta; Gregory Wojtkiewicz; Gabriel Courties; Matt Sebas; Anna Borodovsky; Kevin Fitzgerald; Marc W Nolte; Gerhard Dickneite; John W Chen; Daniel G Anderson; Filip K Swirski; Ralph Weissleder; Matthias Nahrendorf Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kaaweh Molawi; Yochai Wolf; Prashanth K Kandalla; Jeremy Favret; Nora Hagemeyer; Kathrin Frenzel; Alexander R Pinto; Kay Klapproth; Sandrine Henri; Bernard Malissen; Hans-Reimer Rodewald; Nadia A Rosenthal; Marc Bajenoff; Marco Prinz; Steffen Jung; Michael H Sieweke Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Andrew F Malone; Haojia Wu; Catrina Fronick; Robert Fulton; Joseph P Gaut; Benjamin D Humphreys Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 10.121