Literature DB >> 30582247

Ultrasound-Derived Nerve Cross-Sectional Area in Extremes of Height and Weight.

Emilie H Lothet1, Timothy J Bishop1, Francis O Walker1, Michael S Cartwright1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: There is a lack of consensus in the literature as to which body habitus parameter most influences nerve cross-sectional area (CSA). This study was specifically designed to determine if height or weight is more influential.
METHODS: Fifteen young healthy participants, 8 extremely tall and 7 heavy, with no peripheral nerve symptoms were recruited. The tall cohort consisted of males who were 74 inches or taller and females who were 68 inches or taller. The heavy cohort consisted of males who were 274 lbs or heavier and females who were 200 lbs or heavier. Measurements were obtained bilaterally at 7 sites using neuromuscular ultrasound: median nerve at the wrist and mid-forearm, ulnar at the elbow, radial at the spiral groove, fibular at the knee, tibial at the ankle, and sural at the ankle. The nerve CSA at each site was measured by tracing of the nerve using the "freehand" trace function of the ultrasound device.
RESULTS: Weight tightly correlated with nerve CSA (R2 = .69, P < .001), while height did not significantly predict CSA (R2 = .10, P = .244). Nerve CSA for tall participants did not systematically deviate from an historical control group. Conversely, with exception of the tibial and sural nerves at the ankle, all nerve CSAs for heavy participants were higher than in the control group.
CONCLUSION: Weight was found to be the body habitus parameter that most influences nerve CSA. This will inform clinicians when using nerve imaging to evaluate participants at either extreme of weight.
© 2018 by the American Society of Neuroimaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultrasound; height; nerve cross-sectional area; peripheral nerves; weight

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30582247     DOI: 10.1111/jon.12590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimaging        ISSN: 1051-2284            Impact factor:   2.486


  6 in total

1.  Ulnar nerve instability in the cubital tunnel of asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Stacey M Cornelson; Roberta Sclocco; Norman W Kettner
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-03-12

2.  Sonographic normal values for the cross-sectional area of the ulnar nerve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nadine Boers; Enrico Martin; Marc Mazur; David D Krijgh; Monique H M Vlak; Godard C W de Ruiter; H Stephan Goedee; J Henk Coert
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2022-02-19

3.  A systematic review: normative reference values of the median nerve cross-sectional area using ultrasonography in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Audrey Jing Ting Ng; Ramya Chandrasekaran; Ashutosh Prakash; Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Dermatome Mapping Test in the analysis of anatomo-clinical correlations after inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Isabella Mercurio; Claudio Nazzaro; Angelo De Sol; Carlo Boselli; George Rettagliata; Nicola Vanacore; Alberto Santoro; Domenico Mascagni; Claudio Renzi; Massimo Lancia; Fabio Suadoni; Guido Zanghì; Piergaspare Palumbo; Paolo Bruzzone; Guglielmo Tellan; Piergiorgio Fedeli; Francucci Marsilio; Vito D'Andrea
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Neuromuscular Ultrasound in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Trent A VanHorn; Michael S Cartwright
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26

6.  Point-of-care ultrasound of peripheral nerves in the diagnosis of Hansen's disease neuropathy.

Authors:  Glauber Voltan; Fred Bernards Filho; Marcel Nani Leite; Natália Aparecida De Paula; Jaci Maria Santana; Claudia Maria Lincoln Silva; Josafá Gonçalves Barreto; Moises Batista Da Silva; Guilherme Conde; Claudio Guedes Salgado; Marco Andrey Cipriani Frade
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.