Nadine Boers1,2, Enrico Martin3, Marc Mazur3, David D Krijgh3, Monique H M Vlak4, Godard C W de Ruiter5, H Stephan Goedee6, J Henk Coert3. 1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. n.boers-2@umcutrecht.nl. 2. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. n.boers-2@umcutrecht.nl. 3. Department of Plastic Surgery, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Neurology, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Nerve size is a commonly used sonographic parameter when assessing suspected entrapment of the ulnar nerve. We aimed to create a robust set of normal values, based on a critical review of published normal values. METHODS: We performed a systematic evaluation of studies on normal ulnar nerve sizes, identified in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Using meta-analyses, we determined pooled mean cross-sectional area (CSA) values for different anatomical locations of the ulnar nerve throughout the arm. Subgroup analyses were performed for gender, probe frequency, in- or exclusion of diabetic patients, position of the elbow and Asian versus other populations. RESULTS: We identified 90 studies of which 77 studies were included for further analyses after quality review, resulting in data from 5772 arms of 3472 participants. Subgroup analyses show lower CSA values at at the wrist crease and proximal to the wrist crease when using low frequency probes (< 15 MHz) and at the wrist crease, proximal to the wrist crease, proximal forearm and the distal upper arm in Asians. CSA values were lower when in flexed position compared to extended position for the cubital tunnel inlet only. No difference was found for gender. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review provides a comprehensive set of normal values at sites along the entire length of the ulnar nerve. This provides a foundation for clinical practise and upon which future studies could be more systematically compared.
PURPOSE: Nerve size is a commonly used sonographic parameter when assessing suspected entrapment of the ulnar nerve. We aimed to create a robust set of normal values, based on a critical review of published normal values. METHODS: We performed a systematic evaluation of studies on normal ulnar nerve sizes, identified in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Using meta-analyses, we determined pooled mean cross-sectional area (CSA) values for different anatomical locations of the ulnar nerve throughout the arm. Subgroup analyses were performed for gender, probe frequency, in- or exclusion of diabetic patients, position of the elbow and Asian versus other populations. RESULTS: We identified 90 studies of which 77 studies were included for further analyses after quality review, resulting in data from 5772 arms of 3472 participants. Subgroup analyses show lower CSA values at at the wrist crease and proximal to the wrist crease when using low frequency probes (< 15 MHz) and at the wrist crease, proximal to the wrist crease, proximal forearm and the distal upper arm in Asians. CSA values were lower when in flexed position compared to extended position for the cubital tunnel inlet only. No difference was found for gender. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review provides a comprehensive set of normal values at sites along the entire length of the ulnar nerve. This provides a foundation for clinical practise and upon which future studies could be more systematically compared.
Authors: Georg Riegler; Doris Lieba-Samal; Peter C Brugger; Christopher Pivec; Hannes Platzgummer; Martin Vierhapper; Gabriela Muschitz; Suren Jengojan; Gerd Bodner Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Luciana Pelosi; Zsuzsanna Arányi; Roy Beekman; Jeremy Bland; Daniele Coraci; Lisa D Hobson-Webb; Luca Padua; Simon Podnar; Neil Simon; Nens van Alfen; Camiel Verhamme; Leo Visser; Francis O Walker; Joon Shik Yoon; Michael S Cartwright Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2021-05-29 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Zachary N London; James F Burke; Rebecca Hazan; Matthew M Hastings; Brian C Callaghan Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2014-01-25 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Kamal Mezian; Jakub Jačisko; Radek Kaiser; Stanislav Machač; Petra Steyerová; Karolína Sobotová; Yvona Angerová; Ondřej Naňka Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Matthew J Page; David Moher; Fiona M Fidler; Julian P T Higgins; Sue E Brennan; Neal R Haddaway; Daniel G Hamilton; Raju Kanukula; Sathya Karunananthan; Lara J Maxwell; Steve McDonald; Shinichi Nakagawa; David Nunan; Peter Tugwell; Vivian A Welch; Joanne E McKenzie Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2021-04-16