| Literature DB >> 30581317 |
Abdullah Alhamdan1, Bakri Hassan2, Hassan Alkahtani3, Diaeldin Abdelkarim1, Mahmoud Younis1.
Abstract
Fresh harvested dates are perishable and there is a need for extending their shelf life while preserving their fresh like quality characteristics. This study evaluates three different freezing methods, namely cryogenic freezing (CF) using liquid nitrogen; individual quick freezing (IQF) and conventional slow freezing (CSF) in preserving the quality and stability of dates during frozen storage. Fresh dates were frozen utilizing the three methods. The produced frozen dates were frozen stored for nine months. The color values, textural parameters, and nutrition qualities were measured for fresh dates before freezing and for the frozen dates every three months during the frozen storage. The frozen dates' color values were affected by the freezing method and the frozen storage period. There are substantial differences in the quality of the frozen fruits in favor of cryogenic freezing followed by individual quick freezing compared to the conventional slow freezing. The results revealed large disparity among the times of freezing of the three methods. The freezing time accounted to 10 min for CF, and around 80 min for IQF, and 1800 min for CSF method.Entities:
Keywords: Barhi dates; Color values; Freezing methods; Frozen storage; Quality preservation
Year: 2016 PMID: 30581317 PMCID: PMC6302890 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.02.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Mean values of the physical properties of fresh Barhi fruits at Khalal stage of maturity.
| Property | Mass (g) | Volume (cm3) | Density (g cm−3) | Area (cm2) | Length (mm) | Larger diameter (mm) | Diameter neck fruit (mm) | Diameter tip fruit (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 14.8 ± 2.6 | 14.5 ± 2.9 | 1.02 ± 0.05 | 27.9 ± 3.0 | 34.3 ± 2.0 | 27.5 ± 2.0 | 21.7 ± 1.3 | 19.2 ± 1.3 |
| No. of samples | 60 | 60 | 60 | 30 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
Mean values of pulp density, moisture content and pulp water activity for the fresh Barhi fruits at Khalal stage of maturity.
| Thickness of pulp (mm) | Density of pulp (cm3) | Moisture content (w.b.)% | Water activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 8.1 ± 1.4 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 68.6 ± 5.2 | 0.911 ± 0.066 |
| No. of samples | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
Figure 1Changes of basic color parameter values of Barhi fruits frozen by CF, IQF and CSF at different storage times. (a) L∗, (b) a∗ and (c) b∗. (Mean value ± standard deviation of ten replicate measurements is shown.)
Comparison of the mean color values of the frozen Barhi fruits as affected by the freezing method and storage time.
| Freezing method | Frozen storage time (month) | Δ | Hue angle | Chroma | BI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF | 0 | 68.35 a | 10.87 c | 48.44 a | 0.00 f | 77.32 ab | 49.64 a | 123.68 e |
| 3 | 58.8 b | 10.1 c | 45.8 ab | 9.94 e | 77.53 a | 46.90 ab | 143.36 d | |
| 6 | 56.7 bc | 11 c | 44.06 bc | 12.45 de | 75.95 ab | 45.41 bc | 144.51 d | |
| 9 | 53.9 cd | 10.7 c | 42.2 cde | 15.74 cd | 75.74 ab | 43.54 cd | 146.51 cd | |
| IQF | 0 | 68.35 a | 10.87 c | 48.44 a | 0.00 f | 77.32 ab | 49.64 a | 123.68 e |
| 3 | 54.4 c | 14.3 ab | 42.1 cde | 15.70 d | 71.21 cd | 44.46 c | 148.67 c | |
| 6 | 51.6 de | 15 a | 40.1 e | 19.16 bc | 69.46 de | 42.81 d | 151.56 b | |
| 9 | 43.7 f | 15.4 a | 33.9 g | 28.98 a | 65.54 f | 37.23 f | 155.47 a | |
| CSF | 0 | 68.35 a | 10.87 c | 48.44 a | 0.00 f | 77.32 ab | 49.64 a | 123.68 e |
| 3 | 56.5 bc | 13.6 b | 43.1 bcd | 13.28 de | 72.46 bc | 45.19 bc | 144.01 d | |
| 6 | 54.5 c | 14.3 ab | 41.5 de | 15.87 cd | 70.96 cd | 43.89 cd | 145.21 d | |
| 9 | 50 e | 14.8 a | 38.2 f | 21.38 b | 68.79 e | 40.97 e | 148.30 c |
∗The same letter in the same column (a, b, c etc.) indicates that the values are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.
Figure 2Changes of color derivative parameters values of Barhi fruits frozen by CF, IQF and CSF at different storage times. (a) Color deference (ΔE), (b) chroma, (c) hue angle and (d) BI.
Figure 3Effects of freezing methods on the TPA parameters of Barhi fruits at different storage times. (a) Hardness, (b) elasticity, (c) resilience and (d) chewiness. (Mean value ± standard deviation of ten replicate measurements is shown.)
Comparison of the means TPA parameters values of the frozen Barhi fruits as affected by the freezing method and storage time.
| Freezing method | Frozen storage time (month) | Hardness | Elasticity | Resilience | Chewiness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF | 0 | 119.476 a | 1.188 a | 1.264 a | 150.760 a |
| 3 | 47.995 b | 0.846 a | 0.798 b | 37.380 b | |
| 6 | 42.226 b | 0.838 a | 0.664 d | 36.858 b | |
| 9 | 42.204 b | 0.813 a | 0.424 g | 29.351 cd | |
| IQF | 0 | 119.476 a | 1.188 a | 1.264 a | 150.760 a |
| 3 | 34.555 c | 0.837 a | 0.755 c | 31.262 c | |
| 6 | 33.257 c | 0.812 a | 0.613 e | 27.425 de | |
| 9 | 30.004 cd | 0.706 a | 0.400 h | 25.011 e | |
| CSF | 0 | 119.476 a | 1.188 a | 1.264 a | 150.760 a |
| 3 | 30.859 c | 0.821 a | 0.737 c | 28.056 d | |
| 6 | 26.021 d | 0.786 a | 0.582 f | 24.834 e | |
| 9 | 21.040 e | 0.688 a | 0.382 i | 21.020 f |
∗The same letter in the same column (a, b, c etc.) indicates that the values are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.
Figure 4Effects of freezing methods on the enzymes activity of Barhi fruits at different storage times. (Mean value ± standard deviation of ten replicate measurements is shown.)
Comparison of the mean values of the enzymatic activity and sugars of the frozen Barhi fruits as affected by the freezing method and storage time.
| Freezing method | Frozen storage time (month) | PPO | POD | Sucrose | Glucose | Fructose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF | 0 | 0.034 b | 0.039 bc | 21.820 a | 5.040 b | 4.640 b |
| 3 | 0.077 b | 0.048 bc | 4.080 cd | 25.350 a | 22.930 a | |
| 6 | 0.289 a | 0.168 a | 3.110 d | 14.510 b | 8.250 b | |
| 9 | 0.287 a | 0.162 a | 0.000 d | 12.950 b | 7.590 b | |
| IQF | 0 | 0.125 b | 0.034 bc | 19.070 a | 8.070 b | 6.810 b |
| 3 | 0.171 b | 0.040 bc | 16.500 a | 8.070 b | 6.950 b | |
| 6 | 0.182 b | 0.056 b | 10.890 bc | 12.280 b | 10.250 b | |
| 9 | 0.184 b | 0.063 b | 5.140 cd | 10.740 b | 7.680 b | |
| CSF | 0 | 0.121 b | 0.018 c | 19.200 a | 7.400 b | 6.560 b |
| 3 | 0.126 b | 0.031 bc | 17.800 a | 7.800 b | 6.820 b | |
| 6 | 0.146 b | 0.052 b | 13.770 ab | 11.380 b | 9.040 b | |
| 9 | 0.147 b | 0.054 b | 12.320 ab | 7.930 b | 7.260 b |
∗The same letter in the same column (a, b, c etc.) indicates that the values are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.
Figure 5Effects of freezing methods on Barhi fruits’ at different storage times. (Mean value ± standard deviation of ten replicate measurements is shown.)
Figure 6Temperature change with time during CF, IQF and SCF of Barhi fruits.