Literature DB >> 30579645

A meta-analysis of the prevalence of child sexual abuse disclosure in forensic settings.

Corry Azzopardi1, Rachel Eirich2, Christina L Rash2, Sarah MacDonald3, Sheri Madigan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identification, substantiation, prosecution, and treatment of child sexual abuse often rely heavily on a disclosure from the victim in the absence of corroborating evidence. For some, disclosure can be impeded by developmental or motivational barriers, thus compromising child safety and wellbeing. The literature on disclosure prevalence and mitigating influences does not yield a coherent picture. A more accurate estimate will help to inform investigation strategies to facilitate disclosure.
OBJECTIVE: This study provides a meta-analysis of available research examining the prevalence of sexual abuse disclosure in forensic interviews with children under 18 years, and examines a range of factors that may influence the likelihood of disclosure.
METHOD: Databases were searched for published and unpublished studies up to May 2017. In total, 2393 abstracts were assessed for eligibility, 216 full-text articles were reviewed, and 45 samples (with 31,225 participants) provided estimates of effect sizes.
RESULTS: The mean prevalence of child sexual abuse disclosure in forensic settings was 64.1% (95% CI: 60.0-68.1). Between-study variability was explained by: (1) child age and gender, with higher prevalence in older children and females; (2) prior disclosure, with higher prevalence when present; and (3) study year, with higher prevalence in more recent studies.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirms an upward trend in child sexual abuse disclosure prevalence. However, more than a third of children do not disclose when interviewed, with those who are younger, male, and without a prior disclosure at greatest risk. Important implications for forensic interviewing protocols and future research are discussed.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abuse disclosure; Child sexual abuse; Disclosure prevalence; Forensic interviews; Meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30579645     DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Abuse Negl        ISSN: 0145-2134


  6 in total

1.  Detecting children's true and false denials of wrongdoing: Effects of question type and base rate knowledge.

Authors:  Kirsten Domagalski; Jennifer Gongola; Thomas D Lyon; Steven E Clark; Jodi A Quas
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2020-11-25

2.  Children's needs during disclosures of abuse.

Authors:  Tara R Ettinger
Journal:  SN Soc Sci       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  Understanding expert testimony on child sexual abuse denial after New Jersey v. J.L.G.: Ground truth, disclosure suspicion bias, and disclosure substantiation bias.

Authors:  Thomas D Lyon; Shanna Williams; Stacia N Stolzenberg
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2020-11-19

4.  A national survey of child forensic interviewers: Implications for research, practice, and law.

Authors:  Melanie B Fessinger; Bradley D McAuliff
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2020-03-16

5.  Psychometric Properties of the Dominic Interactive in a Sample of French Canadian Sexually Abused Children.

Authors:  Martine Hébert; Arianne Jean-Thorn; Laetitia Mélissande Amédée
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Trauma       Date:  2021-01-27

6.  Magnitude of Child Sexual Abuse and Its Associated Factors Among Children Treated in Public Hospitals of Addis Ababa Ethiopia.

Authors:  Belayneh Alemayehu; Nebiyou Tafesse; Eden Chanyalew
Journal:  Adolesc Health Med Ther       Date:  2022-07-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.