| Literature DB >> 30578927 |
Gaiying Li1, Guoqiang Zhai2, Xinxin Zhao3, Hedi An4, Pascal Spincemaille5, Kelly M Gillen6, Yixuan Ku7, Yi Wang8, Dongya Huang9, Jianqi Li10.
Abstract
Iron accumulation in the substantia nigra (SN) is spatially heterogeneous, yet no study has quantitatively evaluated how the texture of quantitative susceptibility maps (QSM) and R2∗ might evolve with Parkinson's disease (PD) and healthy controls (HC). The aim of this study was to discriminate between patients with PD and HC using texture analysis in the SN from QSM and R2∗ maps. QSM and R2∗ maps were obtained from 28 PD patients and 28 HC on a clinical 3T MR imaging scanner using 3D multi-echo gradient-echo sequence. The first- and second- order texture features of the QSM and R2∗ images were obtained to evaluate group differences using two-tailed t-test. After correction for multiple comparisons, for the first-order analysis, the susceptibility of SN from patients with PD was significantly greater (p = 0.017) compared with the SN from HC. For the second-order texture analysis, angular second moment, entropy, and sum of entropy showed significant differences in QSM (p < 0.001) and R2∗ maps (p < 0.01). In addition, correlation, contrast, sum of variance and difference of variance, significantly separated the subject groups in QSM maps (p < 0.05) but not in R2∗ images. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that entropy and sum of entropy of the QSM maps in the SN yielded the highest performance for differentiating PD patients from HC (area under the curve = 0.89). In conclusion, most first- and second- order QSM texture features successfully distinguished PD patients from HC and significantly outperformed R2∗ texture analysis. The second-order texture features were more accurate and sensitive than first-order texture features for classifying PD patients.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson's disease; Quantitative susceptibility mapping; R2(∗) mapping; Texture analysis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30578927 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage ISSN: 1053-8119 Impact factor: 6.556