| Literature DB >> 30576461 |
Concepción Iñiguez1,2, Jeroni Galmés2, Francisco J L Gordillo1.
Abstract
Despite the high productivity and ecological importance of seaweeds in polar coastal regions, little is known about their carbon utilization mechanisms, especially the kinetics of the CO2-fixing enzyme Rubisco. We analyzed Rubisco carboxylation kinetics at 4 °C and 25 °C in 12 diverse polar seaweed species (including cold-temperate populations of the same species) and the relationship with their ability to use bicarbonate, by using 13C isotope discrimination and pH drift experiments. We observed a large variation in Rubisco carboxylation kinetics among the selected species, although no correlation was found between either the Michaelis-Menten constant for CO2 (Kc) or Rubisco content per total soluble protein ([Rubisco]/[TSP]) and the ability to use bicarbonate for non-green seaweeds. This study reports intraspecific Rubisco cold adaptation by means of either higher Rubisco carboxylation turnover rate (kcatc) and carboxylase efficiency (kcatc/Kc) at 4 °C or higher [Rubisco]/[TSP] in some of the analyzed species. Our data point to a widespread ability for photosynthetic bicarbonate usage among polar seaweeds, despite the higher affinity of Rubisco for CO2 and higher dissolved CO2 concentration in cold seawater. Moreover, the reported catalytic variation within form ID Rubisco might avert the canonical trade-off previously observed between Kc and kcatc for plant Rubiscos.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon concentrating mechanisms; Rubisco; carbon fixation; kinetics; macroalgae; photosynthesis; polar; seaweeds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30576461 PMCID: PMC6382342 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Location, origin, evolutionary history, depth zonation, optimum temperature for growth (Tgrowth), and upper survival temperature (UST) of the seaweed populations studied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen) | Natural population | 15 | Non-endemic | Lower sublittoral | 10 | n.d. |
|
|
| Helgoland (Germany) | Natural population | 6–8 | Non-endemic | Lower sublittoral | n.d. | 18–20 |
|
|
| Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen) | Natural population | 10 | Non-endemic | Lower sublittoral | 4–10 | n.d. |
|
|
| Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen) | Natural population | 2–3 | Arctic Endemic | Upper sublittoral | 0–10 (0) | 18–20 |
|
|
| Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen) | AWI collection (2265) | – | Non-endemic | Upper sublittoral | 12 | n.d. |
|
|
| Roscoff (France) | AWI collection | – | Non-endemic | Lower eulittoral/upper sublittoral | 12 | n.d. |
|
|
| King George Island (Antarctica) | AWI collection (2113) | – | Antarctic Endemic | Mid eulittoral/upper sublittoral | 5 | 15–16 |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen) | Natural population | 10 | Non-endemic | Mid sublittoral | 4–10 | n.d. |
|
|
| Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen) | Natural population | 5 | Non-endemic | Mid sublittoral | 5 | 20 |
|
|
| Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen) | Natural population | 4–6 | Arctic Endemic | Mid sublittoral | 5–10 | 16 |
|
|
| Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen) | Natural population | 5 | Non-endemic | Mid sublittoral | 10 | n.d. |
|
|
| Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen) | AWI collection(3123,3124) | – | Non-endemic | Mid sublittoral | 10 | n.d. |
|
|
| Helgoland (Germany) | AWI collection(3094,3096) | – | Non-endemic | Mid sublittoral | 10–20 (15) | 18–20 |
|
|
| King George Island (Antarctica) | AWI collection(3006,3010) | – | Antarctic Endemic | Mid to lower sublittoral | 0–5 | 11–13 |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| Disko Island (Greenland) | AWI collection(1120) | – | Non-endemic | Upper sublittoral | 0–10 | 22 |
|
|
| Helgoland (Germany) | AWI collection(1083) | – | Non-endemic | Lower eulittoral | 5–15 | 22 |
|
|
| King George Island (Antarctica) | AWI collection(1160) | – | Non-endemic | Lower eulittoral | 5 | 22 |
|
n.d., Not determined.
Rubisco carboxylation kinetics of the analyzed polar populations measured at 25 °C and 4 °C, the ratio between 25 °C and 4 °C measurements for each kinetic parameter, and Rubisco content at the growth conditions
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 18.9±0.8 | 4.8±0.7 | 3.94±0.40 | 1.76±0.03 | 0.14±0.01 | 12.2±0.9 | 93.5±3.8 | 30.1±2.0 | 3.11±0.10 | 8.0±0.7 |
|
| 14.4±1.1 | 5.1±0.6 | 2.83±0.12 | 1.60±0.23 | 0.17±0.03 | 9.3±0.5 | 110.7±7.2 | 33.8±2.4 | 3.27±0.05 | 6.6±0.9 |
|
| 17.5±1.0 | 5.6±0.8 | 3.13±0.26 | 2.59±0.16 | 0.34±0.04 | 7.6±0.6 | 148.1±8.3 | 60.9±0.9 | 2.43±0.14 | 7.4±1.7 |
|
| 15.9±0.6 | 4.9±0.2 | 3.24±0.01 | 2.08±0.05 | 0.27±0.01 | 7.8±0.2 | 131.3±8.1 | 54.6±2.1 | 2.40±0.07 | 9.9±0.6 |
|
| 17.4±1.2 | 5.0±0.2 | 3.50±0.12 | 2.43±0.16 | 0.31±0.01 | 7.8±0.2 | 139.7±3.3 | 62.9±0.3 | 2.22±0.05 | 7.8±0.1 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 23.6±1.0 | 4.1±0.5 | 5.85±1.01 | 2.13±0.14 | 0.23±0.02 | 9.5±1.3 | 90.3±4.3 | 55.5±1.9 | 1.63±0.06 | 17.4±1.8 |
|
| 13.3±0.6 | 2.1±0.3 | 6.44±0.89 | 1.37±0.12 | 0.12±0.02 | 11.3 ±1.3 | 103.3±12 | 61.0±22 | 1.79±0.41 | 17.7±4.7 |
|
| 18.5±1.3 | 3.9±0.8 | 4.96±1.23 | 1.60±0.12 | 0.17±0.02 | 9.2±0.7 | 86.6±6.2 | 47.1±14 | 1.92±0.41 | 30.1±1.4 |
|
| 17.0±1.0 | 4.0±0.3 | 4.25±0.40 | 1.42±0.28 | 0.10±0.02 | 16.4±2.9 | 84.3±20 | 26.1±2.8 | 3.84±0.36 | 24.7±7.5 |
|
| 19.4±1.2 | 3.8±0.4 | 4.99±0.29 | 1.79±0.18 | 0.16±0.03 | 10.8±0.6 | 92.5±7.5 | 43.3±8.4 | 2.17±0.23 | 37.3±6.1 |
|
| 18.1±1.1 | 4.4±0.8 | 4.14±0.49 | 2.08±0.02 | 0.23±0.01 | 9.2±0.6 | 115±7.4 | 51.7±6.5 | 2.23±0.16 | n.d. |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 52.8±1.6 | 17.7±2.6 | 3.01±0.33 | 5.08±0.15 | 0.82±0.03 | 6.2±0.1 | 96.2±2.7 | 46.7±5.7 | 2.07±0.22 | 7.6±0.1 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 9.6±0.4 | 3.1±0.1 | 3.06±0.14 | 2.20±0.23 | 0.20±0.01 | 11.2±0.6 | 230.1±28 | 62.8±4.1 | 3.66±0.28 | 42.3±2.5 |
, Rubisco carboxylase turnover rate; Kc, Michaelis–Menten affinity constant for CO2; /K, carboxylation efficiency; [Rubisco]/[TSP], percentage of Rubisco in the total soluble protein. Data are means ±SD (n=3–5 independent thalli). n.d., Not determined.
Rubisco carboxylation kinetics of the polar and cold-temperate populations of the same species measured at 25 °C and 4ºC, the ratio between 25 °C and 4 °C measurements for each kinetic parameter, and Rubisco content at the growth conditions (data corresponding to the polar populations are also shown in Table 2)
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 18.9±0.8 b | 4.8±0.7 a | 3.94±0.40 a | 1.76±0.03 a | 0.14±0.01 a | 12.2±0.9 a | 93.5±3.8 a | 30.1±2.0 a | 3.11±0.10 a | 8.0±0.7 a |
|
| 15.7±0.7 a | 5.3±1.9 a | 3.24±1.14 a | 1.92±0.19 a | 0.16±0.03 a | 12.1±1.3 a | 122±10.6 b | 31.9±6.8 a | 3.95±0.90 a | 8.5±0.3 a |
|
| 15.9±0.6 a | 4.9±0.2 a | 3.24±0.01 a | 2.08±0.05 b | 0.27±0.01 b | 7.8±0.2 a | 131.3±8.1 a | 54.6±2.1 b | 2.40±0.07 a | 9.9±0.6 a |
|
| 14.9±0.8 a | 4.6±0.1 a | 3.22±0.22 a | 1.85±0.04 a | 0.23±0.01 a | 8.2±0.3 a | 124.8±9.4 a | 49.1±2.6 a | 2.54±0.09 a | 9.4±0.2 a |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 19.4±1.2 a | 3.8±0.4 a | 4.99±0.29 a | 1.79±0.18 a | 0.16±0.03 b | 10.8±0.6 a | 92.5±7.5 b | 43.3±8.4 b | 2.17±0.23 a | 37.3±6.1 a |
|
| 19.6±0.5 a | 4.2±0.6 a | 4.75±0.61 a | 1.34±0.44 a | 0.11±0.04 a | 12.6±0.7 b | 68.1±21.5 a | 26.3±10 a | 2.69±0.38 b | 36.6±6.4 a |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 52.8±1.6 b | 17.7±2.6 a | 3.01±0.33 a | 5.08±0.15 a | 0.82±0.03 a | 6.19±0.07 c | 96.2±2.7 b | 46.7±5.7 a | 2.07±0.22 b | 7.6±0.1 b |
|
| 57.4±1.6 c | 16.4±0.6 a | 3.49±0.16 a | 4.89±0.06 a | 0.82±0.02 a | 5.94±0.11 b | 85.3±2.9 a | 50.1±0.9 a | 1.70±0.09 a | 2.9±0.4 a |
|
| 48.2±0.9 a | 15.6±1.5 a | 3.10±0.25 a | 4.99±0.02 a | 0.86±0.01 b | 5.78±0.06 a | 103.5±2.0 c | 55.0±6.0 a | 1.87±0.16 ab | 6.9±1.4 b |
, Rubisco carboxylase turnover rate; , Michaelis–Menten affinity constant for CO; /Kc, carboxylation efficiency; [Rubisco]/[TSP], percentage of Rubisco in the total soluble protein. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05) between populations of the same species. Data are means ±SD (n=3–5 independent thalli).
Stable carbon isotope discrimination values (δ13Calga) and pH compensation points of the analyzed seaweed populations
|
| δ |
|
|
| ||
|
| –36.5±0.4 a | 9.04±0.03 |
|
| –37.4±0.5 b | n.d. |
|
| –36.4±0.8 | 8.93±0.02 |
|
| –24.2±0.4 | 10.59±0.04 |
|
| –18.6±2.4 a | 10.78±0.06 b |
|
| –18.7±2.7 a | 10.39±0.04 a |
|
| –19±1.3 | 10.78±0.09 |
|
| ||
|
| –28.4±1.2 | 9.33±0.05 |
|
| –26.7±2.9 | 9.34±0.04 |
|
| –29.3±0.8 | 9.44±0.05 |
|
| –25.6±1.2 | 9.61±0.05 |
|
| –21.8±0.8 a | n.d. |
|
| –23.7±1.4 b | n.d. |
|
| –25.2±0.5 | 9.53±0.06 |
|
| ||
|
| –15.1±0.6 a | 10.91±0.01 b |
|
| –20±0.3 c | 10.37±0.03 a |
|
| –16.8±1 b | 10.83±0.01 b |
Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05) between populations of the same species. Data are means ±SD (n=4–5 independent thalli). n.d., Not determined.
Fig. 1.Relationship between the pH compensation point and carbon isotope discrimination (δ13Calga) from all analyzed seaweed populations. Filled circles represent populations distributed in the mid to lower sublittoral and open squares represent populations distributed in the lower sublittoral and/or upper sublittoral. Data are presented as mean ±SD (n=4–5).
Fig. 2.Trade-off between the maximum carboxylation rate (kcatc) and the Michaelis–Menten affinity constant for CO2 (Kc) for the analyzed seaweed Rubiscos at (A) 25 °C and (B) 4 ° C. The solid line represents the correlation of all populations together (including chlorophytes); the dashed line represents the correlation of form ID Rubiscos alone. Data are presented as mean ±SD (n=3–5).
Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the Rubisco kinetic parameters at 25 °C and 4 °C and either the percentage of Rubisco in the total soluble protein, 13C isotope discrimination, or pH compensation point, considering (A) all 17 seaweed populations together, and (B) the 14 red and brown seaweed populations (all possessing form ID Rubiscos) alone
|
| ||||||
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.505* | 0.57* | 0.1 | 0.502* | 0.601* | 0.514* |
|
| 0.455 | 0.637* | 0.488 | 0.554* | 0.65* | 0.519 |
|
| –0.34 | –0.519* | –0.575* | –0.476 | –0.513* | –0.339 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.01 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.44 | 0.518 |
|
| –0.15 | 0.669* | 0.806** | 0.41 | 0.777** | 0.573 |
|
| 0.42 | –0.545 | –0.768** | –0.549 | –0.536 | –0.29 |
k cat c/Kc, carboxylation efficiency; kcatc, carboxylase turnover rate; Kc, Michaelis–Menten affinity constant for CO2; [Rubisco]/[TSP], percentage of Rubisco in the total soluble protein; δ13Calga, 13C isotope discrimination. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Fig. 3.Box plots depicting Rubisco carboxylation kinetics parameters at 25 °C for different taxonomic groups, including the species analyzed in this study (see Tables 2 and 4) and previous published values for others species (see Supplementary Table S1). (A) Carboxylation efficiency (kcatc/Kc); (B) carboxylase turnover rate (kcatc); (C) Michaelis–Menten affinity constant for CO2 (Kc). For each plot, the horizontal line represents the median, the box and whiskers represent the 25th to 75th percentile and the minimum to maximum distributions of the data, respectively, and any value outside this range is displayed as an individual point.