Literature DB >> 25302659

Isotopic discrimination and kinetic parameters of RubisCO from the marine bloom-forming diatom, Skeletonema costatum.

A J Boller1, P J Thomas, C M Cavanaugh, K M Scott.   

Abstract

The cosmopolitan, bloom-forming diatom, Skeletonema costatum, is a prominent primary producer in coastal oceans, fixing CO2 with ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) that is phylogenetically distinct from terrestrial plant RubisCO. RubisCOs are subdivided into groups based on sequence similarity of their large subunits (IA-ID, II, and III). ID is present in several major oceanic primary producers, including diatoms such as S. costatum, coccolithophores, and some dinoflagellates, and differs substantially in amino acid sequence from the well-studied IB enzymes present in most cyanobacteria and in green algae and plants. Despite this sequence divergence, and differences in isotopic discrimination apparent in other RubisCO enzymes, stable carbon isotope compositions of diatoms and other marine phytoplankton are generally interpreted assuming enzymatic isotopic discrimination similar to spinach RubisCO (IB). To interpret phytoplankton δ(13) C values, S. costatum RubisCO was characterized via sequence analysis, and measurement of its KCO2 and Vmax , and degree of isotopic discrimination. The sequence of this enzyme placed it among other diatom ID RubisCOs. Michaelis-Menten parameters were similar to other ID enzymes (KCO2 = 48.9 ± 2.8 μm; Vmax = 165.1 ± 6.3 nmol min(-1 ) mg(-1) ). However, isotopic discrimination (ε = [(12) k/(13) k - 1] × 1000) was low (18.5‰; 17.0-19.9, 95% CI) when compared to IA and IB RubisCOs (22-29‰), though not as low as ID from coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi (11.1‰). Variability in ε-values among RubisCOs from primary producers is likely reflected in δ(13) C values of oceanic biomass. Currently, δ(13) C variability is ascribed to physical or chemical factors (e.g. illumination, nutrient availability) and physiological responses to these factors (e.g. carbon-concentrating mechanisms). Estimating the importance of these factors from δ(13) C measurements requires an accurate ε-value, and a mass-balance model using the ε-value for S. costatum RubisCO is presented. Clearly, appropriate ε-values must be included in interpreting δ(13) C values of environmental samples.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25302659     DOI: 10.1111/gbi.12112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geobiology        ISSN: 1472-4669            Impact factor:   4.407


  8 in total

Review 1.  Acquisition and metabolism of carbon in the Ochrophyta other than diatoms.

Authors:  John A Raven; Mario Giordano
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Novel Insights into the Adaptive Response of Skeletonema costatum to Changing Ambient Phosphorus.

Authors:  Shu-Feng Zhang; Chun-Juan Yuan; Ying Chen; Xiao-Huang Chen; Dong-Xu Li; Jiu-Ling Liu; Lin Lin; Da-Zhi Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  The origin of carbon isotope vital effects in coccolith calcite.

Authors:  H L O McClelland; J Bruggeman; M Hermoso; R E M Rickaby
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Resurrecting ancestral genes in bacteria to interpret ancient biosignatures.

Authors:  Betul Kacar; Lionel Guy; Eric Smith; John Baross
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Rubisco carboxylation kinetics and inorganic carbon utilization in polar versus cold-temperate seaweeds.

Authors:  Concepción Iñiguez; Jeroni Galmés; Francisco J L Gordillo
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 6.  Upper ocean oxygenation, evolution of RuBisCO and the Phanerozoic succession of phytoplankton.

Authors:  Rosalind E M Rickaby; M R Eason Hubbard
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 7.  The curious consistency of carbon biosignatures over billions of years of Earth-life coevolution.

Authors:  Amanda K Garcia; Colleen M Cavanaugh; Betul Kacar
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 11.217

8.  Constraining the timing of the Great Oxidation Event within the Rubisco phylogenetic tree.

Authors:  B Kacar; V Hanson-Smith; Z R Adam; N Boekelheide
Journal:  Geobiology       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.407

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.