BACKGROUND: Incomplete polyp resection during colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) might contribute to the development of interval cancer. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to determine the incidence of incomplete polyp resection during EMR of colorectal polyps located across a fold compared with that of colorectal polyps located between folds. METHODS: In total, 262 patients with 262 lesions that were ≥10 mm in diameter and treated with conventional EMR were enrolled. The main outcome was the incidence of incomplete polyp resections. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to reduce the effects of selection bias. RESULTS: Fifty-seven lesions (21.8%) were incompletely resected. After propensity score matching, the lesions located across a fold were at higher risk of incomplete resection than those between folds (26/68, 38.2% vs 7/68, 10.3%; odds ratio (OR): 3.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.61-8.56; p < 0.01). These findings persisted after adjusting for the differences at baseline using the IPTW method (OR: 3.63; 95% CI: 1.72-7.63; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of an incomplete polyp resection for a colorectal polyp that is located across a fold compared with that for a polyp that is located between folds.
BACKGROUND: Incomplete polyp resection during colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) might contribute to the development of interval cancer. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to determine the incidence of incomplete polyp resection during EMR of colorectal polyps located across a fold compared with that of colorectal polyps located between folds. METHODS: In total, 262 patients with 262 lesions that were ≥10 mm in diameter and treated with conventional EMR were enrolled. The main outcome was the incidence of incomplete polyp resections. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to reduce the effects of selection bias. RESULTS: Fifty-seven lesions (21.8%) were incompletely resected. After propensity score matching, the lesions located across a fold were at higher risk of incomplete resection than those between folds (26/68, 38.2% vs 7/68, 10.3%; odds ratio (OR): 3.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.61-8.56; p < 0.01). These findings persisted after adjusting for the differences at baseline using the IPTW method (OR: 3.63; 95% CI: 1.72-7.63; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of an incomplete polyp resection for a colorectal polyp that is located across a fold compared with that for a polyp that is located between folds.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colorectal polyp; endoscopic mucosal resection; endoscopic resection; incomplete resection; inverse probability of treatment weighting; polypectomy
Authors: William D Farrar; Mandeep S Sawhney; Douglas B Nelson; Frank A Lederle; John H Bond Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2006-09-25 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: S Tamura; K Nakajo; Y Yokoyama; K Ohkawauchi; T Yamada; Y Higashidani; T Miyamoto; H Ueta; S Onishi Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 10.093