Literature DB >> 30574315

Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.

Dirk Domagk1, Kofi W Oppong2,3, Lars Aabakken4,5, Laszlo Czakó6, Tibor Gyökeres7, Gianpiero Manes8, Peter Meier9, Jan-Werner Poley10, Thierry Ponchon11, Andrea Tringali12,13, Cristina Bellisario14, Silvia Minozzi1, Carlo Senore14, Cathy Bennett15, Michael Bretthauer16, Cesare Hassan17, Michal F Kaminski18,19,20, Mario Dinis-Ribeiro21, Colin J Rees22, Cristiano Spada12,23, Roland Valori24, Raf Bisschops25, Matthew D Rutter22,26.   

Abstract

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key and one minor performance measures for EUS and ERCP, for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at centre and endoscopist level: 1 Adequate antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP (key performance measure, at least 90%); 2 antibiotic prophylaxis before EUS-guided puncture of cystic lesions (key performance measure, at least 95%); 3 bile duct cannulation rate (key performance measure, at least 90%); 4 tissue sampling during EUS (key performance measure, at least 85%); 5 appropriate stent placement in patients with biliary obstruction below the hilum (key performance measure, at least 95%); 6 bile duct stone extraction (key performance measure, at least 90%); 7 post-ERCP pancreatitis (key performance measure, less than 10%); and 8 adequate documentation of EUS landmarks (minor performance measure, at least 90%). This present list of quality performance measures for ERCP and EUS recommended by the ESGE should not be considered to be exhaustive; it might be extended in future to address further clinical and scientific issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERCP; EUS; EUS-FNA; Performance measures; quality; quality indicators

Year:  2018        PMID: 30574315      PMCID: PMC6297928          DOI: 10.1177/2050640618808157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  9 in total

1.  Setting the stage for research in endoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Meining
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  UEG Guidelines framework to guide clinical practice.

Authors:  Joost Ph Drenth; Charlie D Murray
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Overcoming the barriers to dissemination and implementation of quality measures for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) position statement.

Authors:  Raf Bisschops; Matthew D Rutter; Miguel Areia; Dirk Domagk; Michel F Kaminski; Andrew Veitch; Wafaa Khanoussi; Ian M Gralnek; Cesare Hassan; Helmut Messmann; Thierry Ponchon; Paul Fockens; Axel Dignass; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  A core curriculum for basic EUS skills: An international consensus using the Delphi methodology.

Authors:  John Gásdal Karstensen; Leizl Joy Nayahangan; Lars Konge; Peter Vilmann
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.275

Review 5.  EUS and ERCP: A rationale categorization of a productive partnership.

Authors:  Juan J Vila; Iñaki Fernández-Urién; Juan Carrascosa
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

6.  Standard reporting elements for the performance of EUS: Recommendations from the FOCUS working group.

Authors:  Suqing Li; Marc Monachese; Misbah Salim; Naveen Arya; Anand V Sahai; Nauzer Forbes; Christopher Teshima; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Yen-I Chen; Eric Lam; Paul James
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  Controversies in ERCP: Technical aspects.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Noor L Bekkali; Sean Burmeister; Yi Dong; Simon M Everett; Michael Hocke; Andre Ignee; Wei On; Srisha Hebbar; Kofi Oppong; Siyu Sun; Christian Jenssen; Barbara Braden
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  Patient Reported Experience Measure in Endoscopic Ultrasonography: The PREUS Study Protocol.

Authors:  Laura Apadula; Gabriele Capurso; Alessandro Ambrosi; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Journal:  Nurs Rep       Date:  2022-02-08

9.  Comparative diagnostic accuracy of EUS needles in solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samuel Han; Furqan Bhullar; Omar Alaber; Ayesha Kamal; Puanani Hopson; Kavin Kanthasamy; Sarah Coughlin; Livia Archibugi; Nikhil Thiruvengadam; Christopher Moreau; David Jin; Pedram Paragomi; Francisco Valverde-López; Sajan Nagpal; Cemal Yazici; Georgios Papchristou; Peter J Lee; Venkata Akshintala
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.