Literature DB >> 30573799

Cancer communication research in the era of genomics and precision medicine: a scoping review.

Kimberly A Kaphingst1,2, Emily Peterson3, Jingsong Zhao4, Anna Gaysynsky5, Ashley Elrick6, Soo Jung Hong7, Melinda Krakow3, Manusheela Pokharel6, Chelsea L Ratcliff6, William M P Klein3, Muin J Khoury8, Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou3.   

Abstract

Effective use of genetic and genomic data in cancer prevention and treatment depends on adequate communication with patients and the public. Although relevant empirical work has emerged, the scope and outcomes of this communication research have not been characterized. We conducted a comprehensive scoping review of recent published research (2010-2017) on communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic testing (CGT) information. Searches in six databases revealed 9243 unique records; 513 papers were included. Most papers utilized an observational quantitative design; fewer utilized an experimental design. More attention has been paid to outcomes of CGT results disclosure than to decision making regarding CGT uptake or the process of results disclosure. Psychosocial outcomes were most common across studies. This literature has a strong focus on BRCA1/2, with few papers focused on Lynch syndrome or next-generation technologies. Women, Caucasians, older adults, and those of higher socioeconomic status were overrepresented. Research gaps identified include the need for studies on the process of CGT communication; examining behavioral, decision making, and communication outcomes; and inclusion of diverse populations. Addressing these gaps can help improve the use of genomics in cancer control and reduce disparities in access to and use of CGT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; communication; decision making; genetic testing; return of results

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30573799      PMCID: PMC7725534          DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0402-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  1 in total

1.  [Clinical cytology].

Authors:  F Morawetz
Journal:  Med Lab (Stuttg)       Date:  1973-10
  1 in total
  11 in total

1.  Relationship between genetic knowledge and familial communication of CRC risk and intent to communicate CRCP genetic information: insights from FamilyTalk eMERGE III.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Deborah J Bowen; Brian H Shirts; Stephanie M Fullerton; Hendrika W Meischke; Eric B Larson; James D Ralston; Kathleen Leppig; David R Crosslin; David Veenstra; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  In-vivo design feedback and perceived utility of a genetically-informed smoking risk tool among current smokers in the community.

Authors:  Jessica L Bourdon; Amelia Dorsey; Maia Zalik; Amanda Pietka; Patricia Salyer; Michael J Bray; Laura J Bierut; Alex T Ramsey
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.063

3.  Information Avoidance, Self-affirmation, and Intentions to Receive Genomic Sequencing Results Among Members of an African Descent Cohort.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2022-02-11

4.  Theory utilization in current communication of cancer genetic testing research: Identified gaps and opportunities.

Authors:  Daniel Chavez-Yenter; Jingsong Zhao; Chelsea L Ratcliff; Kelsey Kehoe; Allison Blumling; Emily Peterson; William M P Klein; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Patient Interactions With an Automated Conversational Agent Delivering Pretest Genetics Education: Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Daniel Chavez-Yenter; Kadyn E Kimball; Wendy Kohlmann; Rachelle Lorenz Chambers; Richard L Bradshaw; Whitney F Espinel; Michael Flynn; Amanda Gammon; Eric Goldberg; Kelsi J Hagerty; Rachel Hess; Cecilia Kessler; Rachel Monahan; Danielle Temares; Katie Tobik; Devin M Mann; Kensaku Kawamoto; Guilherme Del Fiol; Saundra S Buys; Ophira Ginsburg; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Effects of health literacy skills, educational attainment, and level of melanoma risk on responses to personalized genomic testing.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Erva Khan; Kirsten Meyer White; Andrew Sussman; Dolores Guest; Elizabeth Schofield; Yvonne T Dailey; Erika Robers; Matthew R Schwartz; Yuelin Li; David Buller; Keith Hunley; Marianne Berwick; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2020-08-01

7.  Implications of Multigene Panel Testing on Psychosocial Outcomes: A Comparison of Patients With Pancreatic and Breast or Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Cathryn Koptiuch; Whitney F Espinel; Wendy K Kohlmann; Jingsong Zhao; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-01-19

8.  The Impact of Communicating Uncertainty on Public Responses to Precision Medicine Research.

Authors:  Chelsea L Ratcliff; Bob Wong; Jakob D Jensen; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-10-27

9.  State of recent literature on communication about cancer genetic testing among Latinx populations.

Authors:  Daniel Chavez-Yenter; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.717

10.  Behavioral Research in Cancer Prevention and Control: Emerging Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  William M P Klein; Mary E O'Connell; Michele H Bloch; Susan M Czajkowski; Paige A Green; Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; Linda C Nebeling; Robin C Vanderpool
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.