Literature DB >> 30570782

High-throughput screening and environmental risk assessment: State of the science and emerging applications.

Daniel L Villeneuve1, Katie Coady2, Beate I Escher3, Ellen Mihaich4, Cheryl A Murphy5, Tamar Schlekat6, Natàlia Garcia-Reyero7.   

Abstract

In 2007 the United States National Research Council (NRC) published a vision for toxicity testing in the 21st century that emphasized the use of in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) methods and predictive models as an alternative to in vivo animal testing. In the present study we examine the state of the science of HTS and the progress that has been made in implementing and expanding on the NRC vision, as well as challenges to implementation that remain. Overall, significant progress has been made with regard to the availability of HTS data, aggregation of chemical property and toxicity information into online databases, and the development of various models and frameworks to support extrapolation of HTS data. However, HTS data and associated predictive models have not yet been widely applied in risk assessment. Major barriers include the disconnect between the endpoints measured in HTS assays and the assessment endpoints considered in risk assessments as well as the rapid pace at which new tools and models are evolving in contrast with the slow pace at which regulatory structures change. Nonetheless, there are opportunities for environmental scientists and policymakers alike to take an impactful role in the ongoing development and implementation of the NRC vision. Six specific areas for scientific coordination and/or policy engagement are identified. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:12-26. Published 2018 Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of SETAC. This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America. Published 2018 Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of SETAC. This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse outcome pathway; Computational toxicology; Effects-based monitoring; In vitro to in vivo extrapolation; Mixtures; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30570782      PMCID: PMC6698360          DOI: 10.1002/etc.4315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  12 in total

1.  Parameterization of Microsomal and Cytosolic Scaling Factors: Methodological and Biological Considerations for Scalar Derivation and Validation.

Authors:  Michael J Doerksen; Robert S Jones; Michael W H Coughtrie; Abby C Collier
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  The ECOTOXicology Knowledgebase: A Curated Database of Ecologically Relevant Toxicity Tests to Support Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Jennifer H Olker; Colleen M Elonen; Anne Pilli; Arne Anderson; Brian Kinziger; Stephen Erickson; Michael Skopinski; Anita Pomplun; Carlie A LaLone; Christine L Russom; Dale Hoff
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.218

Review 3.  Tracking complex mixtures of chemicals in our changing environment.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Heather M Stapleton; Emma L Schymanski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Xenopus laevis and human type 3 iodothyronine deiodinase enzyme cross-species sensitivity to inhibition by ToxCast chemicals.

Authors:  Sally A Mayasich; Joseph J Korte; Jeffrey S Denny; Phillip C Hartig; Jennifer H Olker; Philip DeGoey; Joseph O'Flanagan; Sigmund J Degitz; Michael W Hornung
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.685

5.  Potential of ToxCast Data in the Safety Assessment of Food Chemicals.

Authors:  Ans Punt; James Firman; Alan Boobis; Mark Cronin; John Paul Gosling; Martin F Wilks; Paul A Hepburn; Anette Thiel; Karma C Fussell
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Towards Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for the Australasian Region of Oceania.

Authors:  Sally Gaw; Andrew Harford; Vincent Pettigrove; Graham Sevicke-Jones; Therese Manning; James Ataria; Tom Cresswell; Katherine A Dafforn; Frederic Dl Leusch; Bradley Moggridge; Marcus Cameron; John Chapman; Gary Coates; Anne Colville; Claire Death; Kimberly Hageman; Kathryn Hassell; Molly Hoak; Jennifer Gadd; Dianne F Jolley; Ali Karami; Konstantinos Kotzakoulakis; Richard Lim; Nicole McRae; Leon Metzeling; Thomas Mooney; Jackie Myers; Andrew Pearson; Minna Saaristo; Dave Sharley; Julia Stuthe; Oliver Sutherland; Oliver Thomas; Louis Tremblay; Waitangi Wood; Alistair Ba Boxall; Murray A Rudd; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.992

7.  Modeling Bioavailable Concentrations in Zebrafish Cell Lines and Embryos Increases the Correlation of Toxicity Potencies across Test Systems.

Authors:  Sebastian Lungu-Mitea; Carolina Vogs; Gunnar Carlsson; Maximiliane Montag; Kim Frieberg; Agneta Oskarsson; Johan Lundqvist
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Integrating in vitro metabolomics with a 96-well high-throughput screening platform.

Authors:  Julia M Malinowska; Taina Palosaari; Jukka Sund; Donatella Carpi; Mounir Bouhifd; Ralf J M Weber; Maurice Whelan; Mark R Viant
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.290

9.  Emerging concepts and opportunities for endocrine disruptor screening of the non-EATS modalities.

Authors:  Christopher J Martyniuk; Rubén Martínez; Laia Navarro-Martín; Jorke H Kamstra; Adam Schwendt; Stéphane Reynaud; Lorraine Chalifour
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Key Characteristics of Cardiovascular Toxicants.

Authors:  Lars Lind; Jesus A Araujo; Aaron Barchowsky; Scott Belcher; Brian R Berridge; Nipavan Chiamvimonvat; Weihsueh A Chiu; Vincent J Cogliano; Sarah Elmore; Aimen K Farraj; Aldrin V Gomes; Cliona M McHale; Kathleen B Meyer-Tamaki; Nikki Gillum Posnack; Hugo M Vargas; Xi Yang; Lauren Zeise; Changcheng Zhou; Martyn T Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.