Kali S Thomas1,2, Emily A Gadbois2, Renee R Shield2, Ucheoma Akobundu3, Andrea M Morris4, David M Dosa1,2. 1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA. 2. Brown University School of Public Health, Providence RI, USA. 3. Meals on Wheels America, Arlington, VA, USA. 4. West Health Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Meals on Wheels (MOW) programs provide home-delivered meals to over 1.5 million older adults; yet, very little is known about the drivers who make meal deliveries possible. Specifically, we do not have clear insight into their interaction with clients or the benefits that they may receive through their service. The objective of this article is to describe the characteristics of MOW drivers, the interactions among drivers and clients, and the benefits of the program to both. Research Design and Method: This qualitative research study reports on interviews with 84 MOW staff (leadership, case managers/client assessors, volunteer coordinators) and drivers at six geographically and operationally distinct programs across the United States. Results: Qualitative analysis of the interviews with MOW staff and drivers revealed the following key themes: (a) clients have multiple vulnerabilities; (b) clients appear to derive social, as well as nutritional benefit from receiving meals; (c) drivers report they provide additional support to their clients beyond delivering the meal; (d) social bonds between drivers and clients were reported to strengthen over time; (e) drivers claim that they, too, derive validation and personal benefit through their meal delivery. Discussion and Implications: This research highlights the significant contributions that meal delivery drivers made in the lives of MOW clients beyond the actual meal itself. This research also spotlights the perceived benefits experienced by the drivers and points to the importance of conducting further research to determine the effects of meal delivery on client and drivers' outcomes, more broadly.
Background and Objectives: Meals on Wheels (MOW) programs provide home-delivered meals to over 1.5 million older adults; yet, very little is known about the drivers who make meal deliveries possible. Specifically, we do not have clear insight into their interaction with clients or the benefits that they may receive through their service. The objective of this article is to describe the characteristics of MOW drivers, the interactions among drivers and clients, and the benefits of the program to both. Research Design and Method: This qualitative research study reports on interviews with 84 MOW staff (leadership, case managers/client assessors, volunteer coordinators) and drivers at six geographically and operationally distinct programs across the United States. Results: Qualitative analysis of the interviews with MOW staff and drivers revealed the following key themes: (a) clients have multiple vulnerabilities; (b) clients appear to derive social, as well as nutritional benefit from receiving meals; (c) drivers report they provide additional support to their clients beyond delivering the meal; (d) social bonds between drivers and clients were reported to strengthen over time; (e) drivers claim that they, too, derive validation and personal benefit through their meal delivery. Discussion and Implications: This research highlights the significant contributions that meal delivery drivers made in the lives of MOW clients beyond the actual meal itself. This research also spotlights the perceived benefits experienced by the drivers and points to the importance of conducting further research to determine the effects of meal delivery on client and drivers' outcomes, more broadly.
Entities:
Keywords:
home-delivered meals; social services; volunteerism
Authors: Katherine A Ornstein; Bruce Leff; Kenneth E Covinsky; Christine S Ritchie; Alex D Federman; Laken Roberts; Amy S Kelley; Albert L Siu; Sarah L Szanton Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Huiping Xu; Michael Weiner; Sudeshna Paul; Joseph Thomas; Bruce Craig; Marc Rosenman; Caroline Carney Doebbeling; Laura P Sands Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-12-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Seth A Berkowitz; Jean Terranova; Caterina Hill; Toyin Ajayi; Todd Linsky; Lori W Tishler; Darren A DeWalt Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: A Kurosu; F Osman; S Daggett; R Peña-Chávez; A Thompson; S M Myers; P VanKampen; S S Koenig; M Ciucci; J Mahoney; N Rogus-Pulia Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Emily A Gadbois; Frances Jimenez; Joan F Brazier; Natalie M Davoodi; Amy S Nunn; Whitney L Mills; David Dosa; Kali S Thomas Journal: Innov Aging Date: 2022-06-02
Authors: Angeliki Papadaki; Becky Ali; Ailsa Cameron; Miranda E G Armstrong; Paul Isaacs; Kali S Thomas; Emily A Gadbois; Paul Willis Journal: Health Soc Care Community Date: 2021-11-12
Authors: Elżbieta W Buczak-Stec; André Hajek; Alexander Pabst; Christian Brettschneider; Hendrik van den Bussche; Birgitt Wiese; Siegfried Weyerer; Jochen Werle; Andreas Hoell; Michael Pentzek; Angela Fuchs; Melanie Luppa; Margit Löbner; Janine Stein; Franziska Förster; Dagmar Weeg; Edelgard Mösch; Kathrin Heser; Martin Scherer; Wolfgang Maier; Matthias C Angermeyer; Michael Wagner; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Hans-Helmut König Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-09-02
Authors: Roma Krzymińska-Siemaszko; Ewa Deskur-Śmielecka; Aleksandra Kaluźniak-Szymanowska; Beata Kaczmarek; Hanna Kujawska-Danecka; Alicja Klich-Rączka; Małgorzata Mossakowska; Sylwia Małgorzewicz; Lechosław B Dworak; Tomasz Kostka; Jerzy Chudek; Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 5.717