Xing Zhao1, Li Yu2, Shengxiang Tao2, Linglong Deng2, Chi Wei2, Bing Wang2, Shaobo Zhu3. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Taihe Hospital of Shiyan, Shiyan Hubei, 442000, P.R.China;Department of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan Hubei, 430071, P.R.China. 2. Department of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan Hubei, 430071, P.R.China. 3. Department of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan Hubei, 430071, P.R.China.zhushaobo2000@163.com.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the application of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in precise and individualized surgical treatment of severe distal humeral bone defect. Methods: Five patients with severe distal humeral bone defects were treated with customized 3D printing prostheses between December 2010 and December 2015. There were 4 males and 1 female, with an age of 23-57 years (mean, 35 years); and the length of the bone defect was 5-12 cm (mean, 8 cm). The cause of injury was mechanical injury in 2 cases and strangulation in 3 cases. All of them were the open fracture of Gustilo type Ⅲ. There were 2 cases of radial fracture, 1 case of cubital nerve injury, and 3 cases of radial nerve injury. The time from injury to one-stage operation was 6-18 hours (mean, 10 hours). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy were recorded. During follow-up, the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films of the elbow joints were performed to identify whether there was prosthesis loosening; Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and upper extremity Enneking score were used to evaluate limb function. Results: The operation time was 140-190 minutes (mean, 165 minutes). The intraoperative blood loss was 310-490 mL (mean, 415 mL). The intraoperative fluoroscopy was 1-3 times (mean, 1.6 times). Five patients were followed up 14-38 months (mean, 21 months). The wound exudate occurred in 1 case and cured after anti-inflammatory local dressing change; the subcutaneous hematoma occurred in 1 case, and improved after color Doppler ultrasound guided puncture and drainage. The MEPS scores and the Enneking scores were all significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05). Except MEPS score between 6 and 12 months after operation had no significant difference ( P>0.05), there were significant differences in MEPS scores and Enneking scores between the other time points ( P<0.05). During the follow-up, no prosthetic loosening or joint dislocation occurred. Conclusion: 3D printing technology can achieve personalized treatment of severe distal humeral bone defects, obtain relatively good elbow joint function, and has less postoperative complications and satisfactory effectiveness.
Objective: To explore the application of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in precise and individualized surgical treatment of severe distal humeral bone defect. Methods: Five patients with severe distal humeral bone defects were treated with customized 3D printing prostheses between December 2010 and December 2015. There were 4 males and 1 female, with an age of 23-57 years (mean, 35 years); and the length of the bone defect was 5-12 cm (mean, 8 cm). The cause of injury was mechanical injury in 2 cases and strangulation in 3 cases. All of them were the open fracture of Gustilo type Ⅲ. There were 2 cases of radial fracture, 1 case of cubital nerve injury, and 3 cases of radial nerve injury. The time from injury to one-stage operation was 6-18 hours (mean, 10 hours). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy were recorded. During follow-up, the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films of the elbow joints were performed to identify whether there was prosthesis loosening; Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and upper extremity Enneking score were used to evaluate limb function. Results: The operation time was 140-190 minutes (mean, 165 minutes). The intraoperative blood loss was 310-490 mL (mean, 415 mL). The intraoperative fluoroscopy was 1-3 times (mean, 1.6 times). Five patients were followed up 14-38 months (mean, 21 months). The wound exudate occurred in 1 case and cured after anti-inflammatory local dressing change; the subcutaneous hematoma occurred in 1 case, and improved after color Doppler ultrasound guided puncture and drainage. The MEPS scores and the Enneking scores were all significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05). Except MEPS score between 6 and 12 months after operation had no significant difference ( P>0.05), there were significant differences in MEPS scores and Enneking scores between the other time points ( P<0.05). During the follow-up, no prosthetic loosening or joint dislocation occurred. Conclusion: 3D printing technology can achieve personalized treatment of severe distal humeral bone defects, obtain relatively good elbow joint function, and has less postoperative complications and satisfactory effectiveness.