| Literature DB >> 30568889 |
Tang Li1, Wenfa Zhang1, Jianhua Hao2, Mi Sun2, Sheng-Xiang Lin1.
Abstract
Cold-active lipases are gaining special attention nowadays as they are increasingly used in various industries such as fine chemical synthesis, food processing, and washer detergent. In the present study, an extracellular lipase gene from Yarrowia lipolytica (LIPY8) was cloned and expressed by baculovirus expression system. The recombinant lipase (LipY8p) was purified using chromatographic techniques, resulting in a purification factor of 25.7-fold with a specific activity of 1102.9U/mg toward olive oil. The apparent molecular mass of purified LipY8p was 40 kDa. The enzyme was most active at pH 7.5 and 17 °C. It exhibited maximum activity toward medium chain (C10) esters. The presence of transition metals such as Zn2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+ strongly inhibited the enzyme activity, which was enhanced by EDTA. The lipase activity was affected by detergents and was elevated by various organic solvents at 10% (v/v). These enzymatic properties make this lipase of considerable potential for biotechnological applications.Entities:
Keywords: Baculovirus expression system; C12E8, octaethylene glycol monododecyl ether; Cold-active; DMF, Dimethylformamide; Extracellular lipase; PH, polyhedrin; Purification; RhB, rhodamine B; RhB-OOe, RhB-olive oil; Yarrowia lipolytica; pNPA, p-nitro phenyl acetate; pNPB, p-nitro phenyl butyrate; pNPD, p-nitro phenyl decanoate; pNPL, p-nitro phenyl dodecanoate; pNPM, p-nitro phenyl myristate; pNPP, p-nitro phenyl palmitate; β-DDM, n-Dodecyl-β-d-Maltoside; β-ME, β-mercaptoethanol; β-OG, n-octyl-β-d-glucoside
Year: 2018 PMID: 30568889 PMCID: PMC6290134 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2018.e00295
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Fig. 1Multiple sequence alignments between LipY8p and highly homologous lipases from Cysteine residues are marked in gray and conserved residues of the active site including serine, aspartic acid and histidine are marked in black.
Fig. 2Time course of LipY8p expression. (A) The plot of lipase activity and cell viability against time. (B) The plot of the cell count versus time.
Fig. 3Purification of the recombinant LipY8p lipase. (A) Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. Peak1, peak2, and peak3 were eluted by buffer A containing 5 mM, 20 mM and 150 mM imidazole, respectively; (B) Mono Q anion exchange. LipY8p was eluted at around 10 mS/cm conductivity. (C) The SDS-PAGE analysis of purified LipY8p. M, protein marker; 1, Mono Q anion exchange chromatography; 2, Peak 3 of Ni-NTA affinity chromatography; 3, ammonium sulfate precipitation.
A summary of LipY8p lipase purification.
| Purification steps | Protein (mg) | Lipase activity (kU | Specific activity | Yield (%) | Purification (fold) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culture medium | 104.37 | 1.81 | 17.37 | 100 | 1 |
| Ammonium sulfate | 61.93 | 1.57 | 25.36 | 86.63 | 1.46 |
| Ni-NTA column | 3.61 | 0.64 | 177.08 | 35.30 | 10.19 |
| Mono Q column | 0.94 | 0.42 | 446.85 | 23.19 | 25.72 |
Activity test was carried out by spectrophotometer in phosphate buffer pH 7.5 at 17 °C, using pNPL as substrate. One unit (U) of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required for the liberation of 1.0 μmol p-nitrophenol per min under the assay conditions.
Fig. 4Optimum temperature (A) and optimum pH (B) on the activity and stability of LipY8p lipase.
Fig. 5Substrate specificity of LipY8p lipase against different chain length Activity of pNP dodecanoate (pNPL) was considered as 100%. pNPP, pNP palmitate; pNPM, pNP myristate; pNPD, pNP decanoate; pNPB, pNP butyrate; pNPA, pNP acetate.
Fig. 6Quantification of fatty acid released by LipY8p hydrolysis of olive oil. (A) Hydrolysis of olive oil in RhB-OOe leads to fluorescence emission. (B) A standard curve prepared with RhB-OOe using 3–18 mM oleic acid. (C) Quantification of fatty acid released by LipY8p hydrolysis of olive oil. The excitation wavelength was set to 350 nm, and fluorescence emission was recorded at 580 nm. Each measurement was performed three times, and standard deviations were indicated.
Effect of metal ions and inhibitors on lipase activity.
| Compounds | Concentration (mM) | Residual activity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | none | 100 ± 1.18 |
| β-ME | 1 | 117.6 ± 1.22 |
| 5 | 129.8 ± 8.32 | |
| 10 | 125.8 ± 1.69 | |
| PMSF | 1 | 80.1 ± 2.22 |
| 4 | 47.6 ± 3.92 | |
| KCl | 1 | 118.4 ± 5.83 |
| CaCl2 | 1 | 96.3 ± 3.99 |
| MgCl2 | 1 | 96.8 ± 1.50 |
| ZnSO4 | 1 | 1.2 ± 0.10 |
| CuCl2 | 1 | 12.5 ± 0.02 |
| NiSO4 | 1 | 51.8 ± 2.11 |
| EDTA | 1 | 136.1 ± 4.49 |
Effect of detergents on lipase activity when present in reaction buffer.
| Detergents | Concentration (v/v or w/v) | Residual activity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | none | 100 ± 1.18 |
| SDS | 0.1% | 0.89 ± 0.16 |
| Triton-X100 | 0.1% | – |
| NP40 | 0.1% | – |
| Tween-20 | 0.1% | 0.14 ± 0.02 |
| β-OG | 0.1% | 105.5 ± 2.18 |
| 0.3% | 2.2 ± 0.10 | |
| β-DDM | 0.1% | – |
| C12E8 | 0.001% | 63.1 ± 5.16 |
| 0.002% | 7.9 ± 1.38 |
-, Activity undetectable.
Effect of detergents on lipase activity and stability when present in enzyme stock solution.
| Detergents | Concentration (v/v or w/v) | Residual activity (%) | Incubation time (h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | none | 100 ± 1.85 | 2 |
| SDS | 0.1% | – | 2 |
| Triton-X100 | 0.1% | 128.1 ± 4.05 | 2 |
| 0.1% | 140.2 ± 4.15 | 24 | |
| 0.1% | 110.4 ± 2.75 | 48 | |
| 0.1% | 96.4 ± 4.44 | 72 | |
| NP40 | 0.1% | – | 2 |
| Tween-20 | 0.1% | – | 2 |
| β-OG | 0.1% | 147.1 ± 0.25 | 2 |
| 0.1% | 124.7 ± 4.19 | 24 | |
| 0.1% | 119.2 ± 2.83 | 48 | |
| 0.5% | 143.9 ± 4.12 | 2 | |
| 0.5% | 127.7 ± 1.58 | 24 | |
| 0.5% | 121.6 ± 2.49 | 48 | |
| β-DDM | 0.1% | 39.9 ± 3.29 | 2 |
| C12E8 | 0.01% | 140.0 ± 2.85 | 2 |
| 0.1% | 144.2 ± 5.50 | 2 | |
| 0.1% | 140.8 ± 3.56 | 24 | |
| 0.1% | 130.0 ± 1.88 | 48 |
-, Activity undetectable.
Effect of organic solvents on lipase activity.
| Solvents | Concentration (v/v) | Residual activity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | none | 100 ± 7.15 |
| Iso-propanol | 10% | 174.4 ± 5.27 |
| 20% | 5.2 ± 0.29 | |
| Methanol | 20% | 180.3 ± 1.71 |
| Ethanol | 10% | 266.7 ± 5.4 |
| 20% | 50.1 ± 3.51 | |
| Acetone | 10% | 361.5 ± 11.3 |
| 20% | 38.7 ± 2.09 | |
| DMSO | 20% | 416.9 ± 22.7 |
Stability of lipase in different organic solvents.
| Solvents | Concentration (v/v) | Residual activity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | none | 100 ± 2.24 |
| Methanol | 20% | 72.81 ± 1.37 |
| Ethanol | 20% | 0.90 ± 0.03 |
| Acetone | 20% | 1.38 ± 0.04 |
| Iso-propanol | 20% | – |
| DMSO | 20% | 88.05 ± 4.64 |
| DMF | 20% | 13.21 ± 0.13 |
| Ethyl Ether | 20% | 10.86 ± 0.16 |
-, Activity undetectable.