Literature DB >> 30564682

Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral, and time to diagnosis: a population-based GP survey nested within a feasibility study using information technology to flag-up patients with symptoms of colorectal cancer.

Elaine Kidney1, Sheila Greenfield2, Lindy Berkman3, George Dowswell4, William Hamilton5, Sally Wood6, Tom Marshall7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with symptoms of possible colorectal cancer are not always referred for investigation. AIM: To ascertain barriers and facilitators to GP referral of patients meeting the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for urgent referral for suspected colorectal cancer. DESIGN &
SETTING: Qualitative study in the context of a feasibility study using information technology in GP practices to flag-up patients meeting urgent referral criteria for colorectal cancer.
METHOD: Semi-structured interview with 18 GPs and 12 practice managers, focusing on early detection of colorectal cancer, issues in the use of information technology to identify patients and GP referral of these patients for further investigation were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and analysed according to emergent themes.
RESULTS: There were two main themes: wide variation in willingness to refer and uncertainty about whether to refer; and barriers to referral. Three key messages emerged: there was a desire to avoid over-referral, lack of knowledge of guidelines, and the use of individually-derived decision rules for further investigation or referral of symptoms. Some GPs were unaware that iron deficiency anaemia or persistent diarrhoea are urgent referral criteria. Alternatives to urgent referral included undertaking no investigations, trials of iron therapy, use of faecal occult blood tests (FOBt) and non-urgent referral. In minority ethnic groups (South Asians) anaemia was often accepted as normal.Concerns about over-referral were linked to financial pressures and perceived criticism by healthcare commissioners, and a reluctance to scare patients by discussing suspected cancer.
CONCLUSION: GPs' lack of awareness of referral guidelines and concerns about over-referral are barriers to early diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barriers; colorectal cancer; diagnosis; over-referral; primary care; referral

Year:  2017        PMID: 30564682      PMCID: PMC6169933          DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X101109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJGP Open        ISSN: 2398-3795


  31 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia.

Authors:  Andrew F Goddard; Martin W James; Alistair S McIntyre; Brian B Scott
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Jenny Chang-Claude; Christoph M Seiler; Alexander Rickert; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  The qualitative research interview.

Authors:  Barbara Dicicco-Bloom; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.

Authors:  Lene Hjerrild Iversen
Journal:  Dan Med J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.240

5.  Missed opportunities in early diagnosis of symptomatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Maite Domínguez-Ayala; Jonathan Díez-Vallejo; Angel Comas-Fuentes
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Evaluation of risk assessment tools for suspected cancer in general practice: a cohort study.

Authors:  William Hamilton; Trish Green; Tanimola Martins; Kathy Elliott; Greg Rubin; Una Macleod
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Missed opportunities to initiate endoscopic evaluation for colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Kuang Daci; Laura A Petersen; Clyde Collins; Nancy J Petersen; Anila Shethia; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Differences in colorectal cancer survival between European and US populations: the importance of sub-site and morphology.

Authors:  G Gatta; L Ciccolallo; R Capocaccia; M P Coleman; T Hakulinen; H Møller; F Berrino
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  D Weller; P Vedsted; G Rubin; F M Walter; J Emery; S Scott; C Campbell; R S Andersen; W Hamilton; F Olesen; P Rose; S Nafees; E van Rijswijk; S Hiom; C Muth; M Beyer; R D Neal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Diagnostic strategies used in primary care.

Authors:  C Heneghan; P Glasziou; M Thompson; P Rose; J Balla; D Lasserson; C Scott; R Perera
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-04-20
View more
  8 in total

1.  Decision support tools to improve cancer diagnostic decision making in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sophie Chima; Jeanette C Reece; Kristi Milley; Shakira Milton; Jennifer G McIntosh; Jon D Emery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  General practitioners' awareness of the recommendations for faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for suspected lower gastrointestinal cancers: a national survey.

Authors:  Christian Von Wagner; Sandro Tiziano Stoffel; Madeline Freeman; Helga E Laszlo; Brian D Nicholson; Jessica Sheringham; Dorothy Szinay; Yasemin Hirst
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Role of primary care physician factors on diagnostic testing and referral decisions for symptoms of possible cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Victoria Hardy; Adelaide Yue; Stephanie Archer; Samuel William David Merriel; Matthew Thompson; Jon Emery; Juliet Usher-Smith; Fiona M Walter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Interventions to improve early cancer diagnosis of symptomatic individuals: a scoping review.

Authors:  George N Okoli; Otto L T Lam; Viraj K Reddy; Leslie Copstein; Nicole Askin; Anubha Prashad; Jennifer Stiff; Satya Rashi Khare; Robyn Leonard; Wasifa Zarin; Andrea C Tricco; Ahmed M Abou-Setta
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Concordance with urgent referral guidelines in patients presenting with any of six 'alarm' features of possible cancer: a retrospective cohort study using linked primary care records.

Authors:  Bianca Wiering; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Willie Hamilton; John Campbell; Gary Abel
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 7.418

6.  How do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? A systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Authors:  Alex Burns; Brian Donnelly; Joshua Feyi-Waboso; Elizabeth Shephard; Raff Calitri; Mark Tarrant; Sarah Gerard Dean
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  The Fast Track FIT study: diagnostic accuracy of faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin in patients with suspected colorectal cancer.

Authors:  James L Turvill; Daniel Turnock; Dan Cottingham; Monica Haritakis; Laura Jeffery; Annabelle Girdwood; Tom Hearfield; Alex Mitchell; Ada Keding
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.302

Review 8.  Undiagnosed microscopic colitis: a hidden cause of chronic diarrhoea and a frequently missed treatment opportunity.

Authors:  Andreas Münch; David S Sanders; Michael Molloy-Bland; A Pali S Hungin
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.