Ming Yi Lai1,2, Hilary McDermott3, John B Chambers4. 1. Medical Student, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 2. Honorary research fellow, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 3. Patient, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 4. Professor of Clinical Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement is one of the most common cardiac operations currently performed. Patients increasingly use the internet for information about their diagnosis and it would therefore be important to know how reliable this is. AIM: To determine the reliability of internet information on aortic valve replacement surgery. DESIGN & SETTING: This was a web-based project scoring sites that might be accessed by a patient. METHOD: The first 50 websites found on each of the four most popular search engines in the UK were viewed, as well as the first 50 videos found on the most popular video-host website. Eligible websites were assessed according to seven positive criteria and three negative criteria, giving a possible range of scores from -6 to 14. RESULTS: There were 79 sites and the median score was 5 (range -1 to 14). There were statistically significant differences between organisation/educational sites with score 7 (2 to 14), hospital sites with score 2 (-1 to 10), commercial sites with score 2.5 (0 to 9) and videos with score 5 (2 to 11). The highest scores went to three NHS sites (score 13 or 14), .gov sites (median score 8.5) and Health On the Net Foundation (HON) accredited sites (median score 7). CONCLUSION: Information on the internet about aortic valve replacement is variable but NHS sites provide the most reliable information.
BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement is one of the most common cardiac operations currently performed. Patients increasingly use the internet for information about their diagnosis and it would therefore be important to know how reliable this is. AIM: To determine the reliability of internet information on aortic valve replacement surgery. DESIGN & SETTING: This was a web-based project scoring sites that might be accessed by a patient. METHOD: The first 50 websites found on each of the four most popular search engines in the UK were viewed, as well as the first 50 videos found on the most popular video-host website. Eligible websites were assessed according to seven positive criteria and three negative criteria, giving a possible range of scores from -6 to 14. RESULTS: There were 79 sites and the median score was 5 (range -1 to 14). There were statistically significant differences between organisation/educational sites with score 7 (2 to 14), hospital sites with score 2 (-1 to 10), commercial sites with score 2.5 (0 to 9) and videos with score 5 (2 to 11). The highest scores went to three NHS sites (score 13 or 14), .gov sites (median score 8.5) and Health On the Net Foundation (HON) accredited sites (median score 7). CONCLUSION: Information on the internet about aortic valve replacement is variable but NHS sites provide the most reliable information.
Entities:
Keywords:
aortic valve replacement; cardiology; internet information
Authors: Nathan Lawrentschuk; Deborah Sasges; Robert Tasevski; Robert Abouassaly; Andrew M Scott; Ian D Davis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Alec Vahanian; Ottavio Alfieri; Felicita Andreotti; Manuel J Antunes; Gonzalo Barón-Esquivias; Helmut Baumgartner; Michael Andrew Borger; Thierry P Carrel; Michele De Bonis; Arturo Evangelista; Volkmar Falk; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Luc Pierard; Susanna Price; Hans-Joachim Schäfers; Gerhard Schuler; Janina Stepinska; Karl Swedberg; Johanna Takkenberg; Ulrich Otto Von Oppell; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano; Marian Zembala Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Rick A Nishimura; Catherine M Otto; Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; John P Erwin; Robert A Guyton; Patrick T O'Gara; Carlos E Ruiz; Nikolaos J Skubas; Paul Sorajja; Thoralf M Sundt; James D Thomas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nelleke M Korteland; Frans J Bras; Fabienne M A van Hout; Jolanda Kluin; Robert J M Klautz; Ad J J C Bogers; Johanna J M Takkenberg Journal: Open Heart Date: 2015-04-08