Literature DB >> 19502242

Predicting outcome after valve replacement.

H Rimington1, J Weinman, J B Chambers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the key predictors of performance on a 6-minute walk and health-related quality of life (QOL) one year after cardiac valve replacement and to use the predictors to guide clinical practice and optimise outcome.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary cardiothoracic centre in the UK. PATIENTS: 225 patients having first time valve replacement with a mean age 67.1 (SD 12.1) years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, morbidity, NYHA, performance on a 6-minute walk and health-related QOL one year after surgery.
RESULTS: One year after valve replacement 90% of patients were alive and free from a major event related to their surgery. NYHA category fell by 0.6. Performance on a 6-minute walk improved by 42% and QOL improved on all subscales and both composite scores of the SF-36 QOL questionnaire. Although physical QOL scores improved they did not normalise, unlike the mental QOL scores which were near normal on both occasions. Independent baseline predictors of 6-minute walk performance at one year were baseline walk performance, age and belief in surgery as a treatment. Independent baseline predictors of one year physical QOL were baseline physical QOL and walk performance. Independent baseline predictors of one year mental QOL were depression, baseline mental QOL and age, with age having a positive effect.
CONCLUSIONS: One year after valve replacement patients can expect a significant improvement in their exercise tolerance and QOL but their physical QOL is unlikely to be normal. Outcome may be improved by treating depression and modifying negative illness beliefs preoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19502242     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2008.160010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  8 in total

1.  Pulmonary function and health-related quality of life 1-year follow up after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Elisabeth Westerdahl; Marcus Jonsson; Margareta Emtner
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 1.637

2.  Patients' Expectations Predict Surgery Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Charlotte J Auer; Julia A Glombiewski; Bettina K Doering; Alexander Winkler; Johannes A C Laferton; Elizabeth Broadbent; Winfried Rief
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-02

3.  Aortic valve surgery: how reliable are health information websites?

Authors:  Ming Yi Lai; Hilary McDermott; John B Chambers
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 4.  EDUCATIONAL SERIES ON THE SPECIALIST VALVE CLINIC: How to run a specialist valve clinic: the history, examination and exercise test.

Authors:  John B Chambers
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2019-12-01

Review 5.  Shared Decision-Making and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  Sahrai Saeed; Elisabeth Skaar; Andrea Romarheim; John B Chambers; Øyvind Bleie
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-08

6.  Effectiveness of early cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart valve surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Wei Xue; Zhang Xinlan; Zheng Xiaoyan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.573

7.  Position paper on the importance of psychosocial factors in cardiology: Update 2013.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Ladwig; Florian Lederbogen; Christian Albus; Christiane Angermann; Martin Borggrefe; Denise Fischer; Kurt Fritzsche; Markus Haass; Jochen Jordan; Jana Jünger; Ingrid Kindermann; Volker Köllner; Bernhard Kuhn; Martin Scherer; Melchior Seyfarth; Heinz Völler; Christiane Waller; Christoph Herrmann-Lingen
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-07

8.  Observed change in peak oxygen consumption after aortic valve replacement and its predictors.

Authors:  Van Doan Tuyet Le; Gunnar Vagn Hagemann Jensen; Lars Kjøller-Hansen
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-05-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.