Literature DB >> 30563826

Performance of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Si Ming Fung1, Xin Yi Wong1, Shi Xun Lee1, Hui Miao2, Mikael Hartman3,4,5, Hwee-Lin Wee6,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: SNP risk information can potentially improve the accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction. We aim to review and assess the performance of SNP-enhanced risk prediction models.
METHODS: Studies that reported area under the ROC curve (AUC) and/or net reclassification improvement (NRI) for both traditional and SNP-enhanced risk models were identified. Meta-analyses were conducted to compare across all models and within similar baseline risk models.
RESULTS: Twenty-six of 406 studies were included. Pooled estimate of AUC improvement is 0.044 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.038-0.049] for all 38 models, while estimates by baseline models ranged from 0.033 (95% CI, 0.025-0.041) for BCRAT to 0.053 (95% CI, 0.018-0.087) for partial BCRAT. There was no observable trend between AUC improvement and number of SNPs. One study found that the NRI was significantly larger when only intermediate-risk women were included. Two other studies showed that majority of the risk reclassification occurred in intermediate-risk women.
CONCLUSIONS: Addition of SNP risk information may be more beneficial for women with intermediate risk. IMPACT: Screening could be a two-step process where a questionnaire is first used to identify intermediate-risk individuals, followed by SNP testing for these women only. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30563826     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  7 in total

1.  Preparation of yolk-shell structure NH2-MIL-125 magnetic nanoparticles for the selective extraction of nucleotides.

Authors:  Shi-Jun Yin; Xu Wang; Hui Jiang; Min Lu; Feng-Qing Yang
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 2.  Cancer Progress and Priorities: Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Serena C Houghton; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.090

Review 3.  Association of microRNA biosynthesis genes XPO5 and RAN polymorphisms with cancer susceptibility: Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Shao; Yi Shen; Lei Zhao; Xudong Guo; Chen Niu; Fen Liu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Exon1 and -116 C/G Promoter Polymorphism on the X-Box DNA Binding Protein- 1 Gene is not Associated with Breast Cancer among Jordanian Women.

Authors:  Lulu H Alsheikh Hussein; Ahmad M Khalil; Ahmad Y Alghadi; Abed Alkarem Abu Alhaija
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-09-01

5.  Inclusion of a gene-environment interaction between alcohol consumption and the aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genotype in a risk prediction model for upper aerodigestive tract cancer in Japanese men.

Authors:  Motoki Iwasaki; Sanjeev Budhathoki; Taiki Yamaji; Sachiko Tanaka-Mizuno; Aya Kuchiba; Norie Sawada; Atsushi Goto; Taichi Shimazu; Manami Inoue; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 6.716

6.  Polygenic risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michele Sassano; Marco Mariani; Gianluigi Quaranta; Roberta Pastorino; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Machine learning for prediction of schizophrenia using genetic and demographic factors in the UK biobank.

Authors:  Matthew Bracher-Smith; Elliott Rees; Georgina Menzies; James T R Walters; Michael C O'Donovan; Michael J Owen; George Kirov; Valentina Escott-Price
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.662

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.