| Literature DB >> 30563100 |
Bin Song1,2, Shengwei Di3, Shiquan Cui4, Na Chen5, Huan Wang6, Xuan Wang7,8, Qian Gao9, Guizhi Tong10, Hongbao Wang11, Xuankai Huang12,13, Liyan Ding14, Ying Gao15, Jun Liu16,17, Xibiao Wang18.
Abstract
Subcutaneous adipose tissue is a loose connective tissue specializing in the regulation of energy storage and metabolization. In domesticated pigs (Sus scrofa), the temporal development of subcutaneous adipose tissue is critical for meat production. However, the regulation of adipose tissue development remains unclear. Here, the subcutaneous adipose tissue development was characterized and compared in lean (Danish-Landrace) and obese (Min) pigs at juvenile and the juvenile-to-adult growth stages. Using RNA sequencing, we profiled the transcriptome of subcutaneous adipose tissue isolated from 4- and 16-week-old pigs and identified 24,718 expressed transcription units. Of them, 6327 genes were differentially expressed between the breeds and/or developmental stages. Compared with obese pigs, upregulated genes in lean pigs showed significant function and pathway enrichment in fatty acid degradation and mitochondrial functions. Further analysis uncovered the distinct usage preferences of the three alternative peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) promoters associated with the development of subcutaneous adipose tissue in both breeds. Transcriptome analysis of subcutaneous adipose tissue in lean and obese pigs suggested that marker-assisted selection of fatty acid degradation and PPARγ signaling pathways could be important directions for future pork quality improvement and modern breeding.Entities:
Keywords: PPARγ; fatty acid degradation; pig; subcutaneous adipose tissue; transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30563100 PMCID: PMC6321263 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19123892
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Developmental features of the Danish-Landrace (DL) and Min pigs. (A) DL and Min pigs at 24 weeks of age. (B–E) Slaughter weight, body fat rate content, backfat thickness, and intramuscular fat content of female DL and Min pigs at 4 weeks (4 W), 10 weeks (10 W), 16 weeks (16 W), and 24 weeks (24 W). Data presented with standard deviation bars per group (n = 3).
Figure 2Gene identification and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in DL and Min pigs. (A) The expressed transcription units in each pig breed. Transcription units with normalized read count were considered “expressed transcription units.” 4 W, 4-week-old pigs; 16 W, 16-week-old pigs. (B) DEGs in each pig breed (Fragments Per Kilobase of exon per Million fragments mapped (FPKM) fold-change > 2; p < 0.05).
Figure 3Experimental verification of gene expression level using qRT-PCR. (A) The relative expression levels (Min/DL) of 11 DEGs verified in 16-week-old pigs. (B) The relative expression levels (DL/Min) of 10 DEGs verified in 16-week-old pigs. Data presented with standard error bars per group (n = 3).
Figure 4Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment of upregulated genes. GO enrichment of upregulated genes in 4-week-old Min (A), 4-week-old DL (B), 16-week-old Min (C), and 16-week-old DL (D) pigs. The X-axis provides the richness factor, which is calculated by dividing the upregulated gene number in a given GO term by the total gene number in the term of genome. The size and color of the bubbles represent gene number and enrichment significance according to hypergeometric testing, respectively.
Figure 5DL-specific DEG enrichment in the fatty acid degradation pathway. Enzymes encoded by upregulated genes in the DL pigs at 16 weeks are highlighted in red.
Figure 6PPARγ promoter usage in the DL and Min pigs. (A) The assembled exon structures of PPARγ in pigs. Peaks show RNA-seq reads mapped to genomic regions in each pig breed at 4 weeks (4W) and 16 weeks (16W) of age (n = 3 biological replicates). (B) Read number mapped to the first exon of each PPARγ isoform. Read number was normalized by reads per million reads (RPM). (C) PPARγ promoter usages. PPARγ transcript isoform proportions were calculated by dividing the read number mapped to each first exon by the total read number mapped to all three first exons. (D) Expression level verification by qRT-PCR. Blue arrows in A give the exon regions used to design the qRT-PCR primers. Data presented with standard error bars per group (n = 3).