Literature DB >> 30562165

An active learning framework for enhancing identification of non-artifactual intracranial pressure waveforms.

Murad Megjhani1, Ayham Alkhachroum, Kalijah Terilli, Jenna Ford, Clio Rubinos, Julie Kromm, Brendan K Wallace, E Sander Connolly, David Roh, Sachin Agarwal, Jan Claassen, Raghav Padmanabhan, Xiao Hu, Soojin Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial pressure (ICP) is an important and established clinical measurement that is used in the management of severe acute brain injury. ICP waveforms are usually triphasic and are susceptible to artifact because of transient catheter malfunction or routine patient care. Existing methods for artifact detection include threshold-based, stability-based, or template matching, and result in higher false positives (when there is variability in the ICP waveforms) or higher false negatives (when the ICP waveforms lack complete triphasic components but are valid). APPROACH: We hypothesized that artifact labeling of ICP waveforms can be optimized by an active learning approach which includes interactive querying of domain experts to identify a manageable number of informative training examples. MAIN
RESULTS: The resulting active learning based framework identified non-artifactual ICP pulses with a superior AUC of 0.96 + 0.012, compared to existing methods: template matching (AUC: 0.71 + 0.04), ICP stability (AUC: 0.51 + 0.036) and threshold-based (AUC: 0.5 + 0.02). SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed active learning framework will support real-time ICP-derived analytics by improving precision of artifact-labelling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30562165      PMCID: PMC6681897          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aaf979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  31 in total

1.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Intracranial pressure waveform morphology and intracranial adaptive capacity.

Authors:  Jun-Yu Fan; Catherine Kirkness; Paolo Vicini; Robert Burr; Pamela Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Relative Position of the Third Characteristic Peak of the Intracranial Pressure Pulse Waveform Morphology Differentiates Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus Shunt Responders and Nonresponders.

Authors:  Robert Hamilton; Jennifer Fuller; Kevin Baldwin; Paul Vespa; Xiao Hu; Marvin Bergsneider
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2016

4.  Ventriculostomy: Frequency, length of stay and in-hospital mortality in the United States of America, 1988-2010.

Authors:  Benjamin P Rosenbaum; Sumeet Vadera; Michael L Kelly; Varun R Kshettry; Robert J Weil
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Forecasting ICP elevation based on prescient changes of intracranial pressure waveform morphology.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Peng Xu; Shadnaz Asgari; Paul Vespa; Marvin Bergsneider
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Is intracranial pressure waveform analysis useful in the management of pediatric neurosurgical patients?

Authors:  P K Eide; A Egge; B J Due-Tønnessen; E Helseth
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.162

7.  Morphological clustering and analysis of continuous intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Peng Xu; Fabien Scalzo; Paul Vespa; Marvin Bergsneider
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 8.  Advances in Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Its Significance in Managing Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Usmah Kawoos; Richard M McCarron; Charles R Auker; Mikulas Chavko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Morphological Feature Extraction From a Continuous Intracranial Pressure Pulse via a Peak Clustering Algorithm.

Authors:  Hack-Jin Lee; Eun-Jin Jeong; Hakseung Kim; Marek Czosnyka; Dong-Joo Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 10.  Monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Christopher Hawthorne; Ian Piper
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Neurocritical Care: Bench to Bedside (Eds. Claude Hemphill, Michael James) Integrating and Using Big Data in Neurocritical Care.

Authors:  Brandon Foreman
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  IRIS: A Modular Platform for Continuous Monitoring and Caretaker Notification in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Steven N Baldassano; Shawniqua Williams Roberson; Ramani Balu; Brittany Scheid; John M Bernabei; Jay Pathmanathan; Brian Oommen; Damien Leri; Javier Echauz; Michael Gelfand; Paulomi Kadakia Bhalla; Chloe E Hill; Amanda Christini; Joost B Wagenaar; Brian Litt
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.772

3.  Patient-adaptable intracranial pressure morphology analysis using a probabilistic model-based approach.

Authors:  Paria Rashidinejad; Xiao Hu; Stuart Russell
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.833

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.