Literature DB >> 30561906

Novel Impactor and Microsphere-Based Assay Used to Measure Containment of Aerosols Generated in a Flow Cytometer Cell Sorter.

Stephen P Perfetto1, Phillip J Hogarth2, Simon Monard3, Ben Fontes4, Kristen M Reifel5, Brandon K Swan5, Jan Baijer6, Evan R Jellison7, Geoffrey Lyon8, Patty Lovelace9, Richard Nguyen1, David Ambrozak1, Kevin L Holmes10.   

Abstract

Today's state-of-the-art cell sorting flow cytometers are equipped with aerosol containment systems designed to evacuate aerosols from the sort chamber during a sort. This biosafety device is especially important when the sort operator is sorting infectious or potentially infections samples. Hence, it is critical to evaluate the performance for this system in normal operation and in "failure" mode to determine the efficacy of containment. In the past decade, the most popular published method for evaluating containment has been the Glo-Germ bead procedure. These highly fluorescent and multisize particles can easily be detected on a microscope slide and enumerated using a fluorescent microscope. Collecting particles on this slide is accomplished using an Aerotech impactor. This sampler collects potentially escaping aerosols from the sort chamber before enumerating any particles. Although the Glo-Germ procedure has been adopted by many labs, there are several drawbacks with the procedure that have limited its adoption by cell sorter laboratories: The Aerotech impactor is a reusable device that requires rigorous cleaning between measurements. The surface area of the collection slide is large and difficult to scan on a fluorescence microscope. These beads produce a wide variation in sizes resulting in inconsistency in flow rates. Here, we describe a novel and replacement method utilizing a Cyclex-d impactor and Dragon Green beads. This method was compared for sensitivity of detection of escaped aerosols with a published method for aerosol detection which utilizes a UV-APS aerodynamic particle sizer and a UV-excitable dye. One of the advantages of the Cyclex-d system is the narrow-defined field of collection as compared to the standard Glo-Germ bead procedure, this means a smaller sampling area is used in the Cyclex-d impactor as compared to the AeroTech impactor. In addition, the sensitivity of detection was found to be better using the Cyclex-d collection device as compared to the standard Glo-Germ bead procedure.
© 2018 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. © 2018 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aerosol measurement; biosafety; infectious cell sorting; shared resource lab operations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30561906      PMCID: PMC6375770          DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  10 in total

1.  Novel rapid method for visualization of extent and location of aerosol contamination during high-speed sorting of potentially biohazardous samples.

Authors:  A S Oberyszyn; F M Robertson
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  2001-03-01

2.  Measuring containment of viable infectious cell sorting in high-velocity cell sorters.

Authors:  Stephen P Perfetto; David R Ambrozak; Richard A Koup; Mario Roederer
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  High-speed cell sorting.

Authors:  J F Leary
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cytom       Date:  2001-05

4.  Testing the efficiency of aerosol containment during cell sorting.

Authors:  I Schmid; L E Hultin; J Ferbas
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cytom       Date:  2001-05

5.  Evaluation of cell sorting aerosols and containment by an optical airborne particle counter.

Authors:  Mike Xie; Michael T Waring
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.355

6.  International Society for the Advancement of Cytometry cell sorter biosafety standards.

Authors:  Kevin L Holmes; Benjamin Fontes; Philip Hogarth; Richard Konz; Simon Monard; Charles H Pletcher; Robert B Wadley; Ingrid Schmid; Stephen P Perfetto
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.355

7.  Characterization of aerosols produced by cell sorters and evaluation of containment.

Authors:  Kevin L Holmes
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  Assessment of aerosol containment on the ELITE flow cytometer.

Authors:  J Ferbas; K R Chadwick; A Logar; A E Patterson; R W Gilpin; J B Margolick
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1995-03-15

9.  Evaluation of selected aerosol-control measures on flow sorters.

Authors:  J T Merrill
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1981-03

10.  Standard practice for cell sorting in a BSL-3 facility.

Authors:  Stephen P Perfetto; David R Ambrozak; Richard Nguyen; Mario Roederer; Richard A Koup; Kevin L Holmes
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Validation and Application of a Benchtop Cell Sorter in a Biosafety Level 3 Containment Setting.

Authors:  Lydia M Roberts; Rebecca Anderson; Aaron Carmody; Catharine M Bosio
Journal:  Appl Biosaf       Date:  2021-11-24

2.  Establishing a biosafety plan for a flow cytometry shared resource laboratory.

Authors:  Jessica B Back; Lola Martinez; Lauren Nettenstrom; Dagna Sheerar; Sherry Thornton
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.714

3.  Procedures for Flow Cytometry-Based Sorting of Unfixed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infected Cells and Other Infectious Agents.

Authors:  Kristen M Reifel; Brandon K Swan; Evan R Jellison; David Ambrozak; Jan Baijer; Richard Nguyen; Simon Monard; Geoffrey Lyon; Benjamin Fontes; Stephen P Perfetto
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 4.  Biosafety during a pandemic: shared resource laboratories rise to the challenge.

Authors:  Avrill M Aspland; Iyadh Douagi; Andrew Filby; Evan R Jellison; Lola Martinez; Diana Shinko; Adrian L Smith; Vera A Tang; Sherry Thornton
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.714

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.