Literature DB >> 35576950

Microbiological Impacts of Decontamination of Stethoscopes and Assessment of Disinfecting Practices among Physicians in Pakistan: A Quality Improvement Survey.

Muhammad Junaid Tahir1,2, Musharaf Zaman1,2, Saad Babar1,2, Fareeha Imran1,2,3, Aasma Noveen Ajmal1,2,3, Muna Malik1,2,3,4, Jalees Khalid Khan1,2,3, Irfan Ullah5,6,7, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar8.   

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine bacterial contamination of stethoscopes used by doctors before and after disinfecting with isopropyl alcohol and analyze their practices of disinfecting stethoscopes. Samples from stethoscopes were taken before and after disinfecting with 70% isopropyl alcohol swab with the help of a sterile swab. All swabs were inoculated on Blood and MacConkey agar plates and were examined for growth. Stethoscopes of 78 doctors were sampled which included 45 (58%) males and 33 (42%) females. Before decontamination of diaphragms with isopropyl alcohol, 27 (34.6%) diaphragms had "growth" while 51 (65.4%) had "no growth." After decontamination with isopropyl alcohol, 5 (6.4%) had "growth" while 73 (93.6%) had "no growth." The most common microorganism isolated from stethoscopes' diaphragms was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE), that is, 14 out of 78 (17.9%). The survey also evaluated factors associated with contamination of stethoscopes. Most doctors 71(91%) believe that stethoscopes can be a source of infection and 55.1% (N = 43) responded that both diaphragm and bell of stethoscopes can transmit infections. Many doctors (41%, N = 32) reported that "forgetfulness/laziness" was the barrier which they faced regarding stethoscope hygiene followed by "lack of time" (21.8%, N = 17). The contamination rate (66.6%) is highest in those doctors who are using their stethoscopes for 3-5 years. Of them, 30 doctors (38.5%) never decontaminated their stethoscopes among which 17 had growth in their stethoscopes before cleaning with isopropyl alcohol, while three had growth even after decontamination. Most doctors used sanitizer (29.5%) and isopropyl alcohol (25.6%) as cleaning agents.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35576950      PMCID: PMC9294694          DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0002-9637            Impact factor:   3.707


  26 in total

1.  Predictors of stethoscope disinfection among pediatric health care providers.

Authors:  Jeanette Muniz; Rosh K V Sethi; Justin Zaghi; Sonja I Ziniel; Thomas J Sandora
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Isopropyl alcohol is as efficient as chlorhexidine to prevent contamination of blood cultures.

Authors:  Jovanna Martínez; Juan H Macías; Virginia Arreguín; Jose A Álvarez; Alejandro E Macías; Juan L Mosqueda-Gómez
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Bacterial contamination of stethoscopes on the intensive care unit.

Authors:  A M Whittington; G Whitlow; D Hewson; C Thomas; S J Brett
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Contamination of stethoscopes with MRSA and current disinfection practices.

Authors:  L Fenelon; L Holcroft; N Waters
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Bacterial contamination, bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolates from stethoscopes at Jimma University Specialized Hospital.

Authors:  Teklu Shiferaw; Getenet Beyene; Tesfaye Kassa; Tsegaye Sewunet
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Contamination of stethoscopes and physicians' hands after a physical examination.

Authors:  Yves Longtin; Alexis Schneider; Clément Tschopp; Gesuèle Renzi; Angèle Gayet-Ageron; Jacques Schrenzel; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Stethoscope, "the friendly foe" - A study to evaluate bacterial contamination of stethoscopes and disinfection practices.

Authors:  Priya Datta; Mandeep Kaur; Sangeeta Rawat; Varsha Gupta; Jagdish Chander
Journal:  J Infect Dev Ctries       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  Bacteriological assessment of stethoscopes used by healthcare workers in a tertiary care centre of Nepal.

Authors:  Sangita Thapa; Lokendra Bahadur Sapkota
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-07-28

Review 9.  Persistent Value of the Stethoscope in the Age of COVID-19.

Authors:  Rajiv S Vasudevan; Yu Horiuchi; Francesca J Torriani; Bruno Cotter; Sofie M Maisel; Sanjeet S Dadwal; Robert Gaynes; Alan S Maisel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  A quasi-experimental study on stethoscopes contamination with multidrug-resistant bacteria: Its role as a vehicle of transmission.

Authors:  Raeseok Lee; Su-Mi Choi; Sung Jin Jo; Songyi Han; Yun Jeong Park; Min A Choi; Bo Kyung Kong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.