Literature DB >> 3055939

Comparative tensile strengths of brackets bonded to porcelain with orthodontic adhesive and porcelain repair systems.

R Eustaquio1, L D Garner, B K Moore.   

Abstract

The acceptance of simplified technical procedures that minimize clinical effort is exemplified by the popularity of direct bonding. This study (1) measured the comparative tensile bond strengths of brackets bonded directly in vitro to both glazed and deglazed porcelains by the use of five adhesive systems, and (2) recorded failure sites. System 1+, Enamelite 500, Isopast/Silanit, and Concise/Scotchprime proved to have strengths that should be acceptable clinically. Ultra-bond produced a bond that was significantly less in strength as compared with the other four systems. There was no significant difference in the bond of glazed and deglazed porcelains. Diamond polishing paste was better at restoring the porcelain surface to original smoothness in comparison with polishing stones. Irreversible damage to the porcelain surface may result from the bonding procedure.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3055939     DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90132-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  14 in total

1.  In-vitro study of the adhesive strengths of brackets on metals, ceramic and composite. Part 2: Bonding to porcelain and composite resin.

Authors:  P G Jost-Brinkmann; S Can; C Drost
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Scanning Electron Microscope Comparative Evaluation of Feldspathic Porcelain Surfaces under Irradiation by Different Powers of Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Nd:YAG) Laser.

Authors:  Mohammad Hashem Hosseini; Farhad Sobouti; Ardavan Etemadi; Nasim Chiniforush; Stephane Ayoub Bouraima
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013

3.  Comparative study of the effect of Er:YAG and Er:Cr;YSGG lasers on porcelain: etching for the bonding of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Amirhossein Mirhashemi; Nasim Chiniforush; Hanieh Jadidi; Nastaran Sharifi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Evaluation of the effect of four surface conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of metal bracket to porcelain surface.

Authors:  Hooman Zarif Najafi; Morteza Oshagh; Sepideh Torkan; Bahareh Yousefipour; Raha Salehi
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  [The effect of adhesive agents on the bonding strength of ceramic-composite. An in-vitro comparative study with 6 "porcelain primers" and a control group].

Authors:  S Pies; B Kahl; C W Schwarze
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1991-12

6.  CO2 laser conditioning of porcelain surfaces for bonding metal orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Farzin Heravi; Mohsen Hosseini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Effects of cyclic loading on the bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to a porcelain surface using different conditioning protocols.

Authors:  Yasser L Abdelnaby
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Assessment of Bond Strength between Metal Brackets and Non-Glazed Ceramic in Different Surface Treatment Methods.

Authors:  Ms Ahmad Akhoundi; M Rahmati Kamel; T Hooshmand; I Harririan; Mj Kharazi Fard; H Noroozi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-06-30

9.  Tensile bond strength of metal bracket bonding to glazed ceramic surfaces with different surface conditionings.

Authors:  Ms Ahmad Akhoundi; M Rahmati Kamel; Sh Mahmood Hashemi; M Imani
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2011-12-20

10.  Porcelain surface alterations and refinishing after use of two orthodontic bonding methods.

Authors:  Drew T Herion; Jack L Ferracane; David A Covell
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.