| Literature DB >> 30558202 |
Yang He1, Renfu Luo2,3, Tianyi Wang4, Jingjing Gao5, Chengfang Liu6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a substantial body of evidence supporting the association between maternal active smoking during pregnancy and child development, but the association between prenatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and early child development has not been well documented. This cross-sectional study examines the association between prenatal exposure to ETS and the development of children in their first two years of life.Entities:
Keywords: early development; environmental tobacco smoke; prenatal exposure to ETS
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30558202 PMCID: PMC6313710 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15122866
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flowchart of this study.
The VIF values of the multicollinearity test of linear regression model with confounding variables.
| Variables | VIF Values |
|---|---|
| ETS/ Packs of cigarettes per week | 1.06 |
| Child’s gender (male = 1) | 1.10 |
| Age of child in months | 1.57 |
| Low birth weight (yes = 1) | 1.08 |
| Mother’s age in years | 1.15 |
| Education attainment of the mother | 1.09 |
| If mother is the primary caregiver of the child | 1.19 |
| Family income in the last year | 1.12 |
| Mean VIF | 1.50 |
Notes: VIF, variance inflation factor.
Comparison of socioeconomic characteristics between children with and without maternal prenatal exposure to ETS (environmental tobacco smoke).
| Variables | Prenatal Exposure to ETS? | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No ( | Yes ( | |||
| Sex | Boy | 105 (59.7) | 152 (56.3) | 0.48 |
| Girl | 71 (40.3) | 118 (43.7) | ||
| Age of child in month (Mean ± SD) | 14.8 ± 5.6 | 14.5 ± 5.4 | 0.59 | |
| Low birth weight | No | 160 (91.9) | 254 (94.1) | 0.39 |
| Yes | 14 (8.1) | 16 (5.9) | ||
| Age of mother in year (Mean ± SD) | 24.7 ± 5.6 | 24.5 ± 4.9 | 0.60 | |
| Education of mother | ≤9 years | 151 (85.8) | 242 (89.6) | 0.22 |
| >9 years | 25 (14.2) | 28 (10.4) | ||
| Is mother primary caregiver | No | 90 (51.7) | 132 (48.9) | 0.56 |
| Yes | 84 (48.3) | 138 (51.1) | ||
| Family income in the last year (RMB) | ≤25,000 Yuan | 71 (40.6) | 107 (39.6) | 0.84 |
| >25,000 Yuan | 104 (59.4) | 163 (60.4) | ||
SD, Standard deviation; numbers in parenthesis are percentages for categorical variables.
Figure A1The distribution of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III (BSID-III) test score among children with and without ETS (environmental tobacco smoke) exposure during pregnancy.
Figure A2The association between BSID-III test score and the frequency of exposure to ETS during pregnancy.
Comparison of child development by socioeconomic characteristics of sampled children.
| Variables | Cognition Score | Language Score | Motor Score | Social Emotional Score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Mean ± SD) | (Mean ± SD) | (Mean ± SD) | (Mean ± SD) | ||||||
| Sex | Boy | 95.6 ± 16.5 | 0.08 | 88.9 ± 13.7 | 0.17 | 96.2 ± 15.4 | 0.19 | 85.3 ± 12.3 | 0.95 |
| Girl | 92.9 ± 16.0 | 90.7 ± 14.0 | 94.2 ± 16.2 | 85.4 ± 11.4 | |||||
| Age of child | ≤15 months | 97.3 ± 16.4 | <0.01 | 91.2 ± 14.5 | 0.02 | 90.4 ± 16.0 | <0.01 | 84.4 ± 12.2 | 0.10 |
| >15 months | 91.5 ± 15.7 | 88.2 ± 12.0 | 100.5 ± 13.8 | 86.3 ± 11.5 | |||||
| Low birth weight | No | 94.9 ± 16.0 | 0.05 | 90.0 ± 13.5 | 0.13 | 95.7 ± 15.5 | 0.14 | 85.7 ± 11.7 | 0.07 |
| Yes | 89.0 ± 18.0 | 86.1 ± 16.5 | 91.3 ± 18.6 | 81.7 ± 13.7 | |||||
| Age of mother | ≤25 years | 95.2 ± 15.7 | 0.23 | 89.9 ± 13.4 | 0.65 | 95.4 ± 15.8 | 0.90 | 85.7 ± 11.9 | 0.33 |
| >25 years | 93.2 ± 17.3 | 89.3 ± 14.6 | 95.2 ± 15.8 | 84.5 ± 11.9 | |||||
| Education of mother | ≤9 years | 93.9 ± 16.5 | 0.04 | 89.4 ± 13.7 | 0.23 | 95.1 ± 15.9 | 0.33 | 85.1 ± 12.1 | 0.19 |
| >9 years | 98.8 ± 14.6 | 91.8 ± 14.5 | 97.3 ± 14.7 | 87.4 ± 10.4 | |||||
| Is mother primary caregiver | No | 92.9 ± 15.4 | 0.04 | 87.7 ± 12.5 | <0.01 | 96.1 ± 15.2 | 0.38 | 86.0 ± 12.4 | 0.32 |
| Yes | 96.1 ± 16.9 | 91.9 ± 14.5 | 94.8 ± 16.3 | 84.8 ± 11.3 | |||||
| Family income in the last year (RMB) | ≤ 25,000 Yuan | 91.7 ± 14.7 | <0.01 | 88.4 ± 13.6 | 0.11 | 93.9 ± 15.8 | 0.11 | 85.6 ± 12.4 | 0.70 |
| >25,000 Yuan | 96.3 ± 15.8 | 90.5 ± 13.9 | 96.3 ± 15.7 | 85.2 ± 11.6 | |||||
SD, Standard deviation; numbers in parenthesis are percentages for categorical variables.
Multivariate regression for prenatal exposure to ETS on child development in rural Guizhou province.
| Dependent Variables | Unadjusted Analysis (ETS = 1) a | Adjusted Analysis (ETS = 1) a,b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient (95% CI) | Coefficient (95% CI) | |||
| Cognition score | −2.75 (−5.40, −0.11) | 0.04 | −3.41 (−6.39, −0.42) | 0.03 |
| Language score | −2.62 (−5.36, 0.13) | 0.06 | −3.01 (−5.93, −0.09) | 0.04 |
| Motor score | −2.78 (−5.74, 0.71) | 0.06 | −2.52 (−5.43, 0.38) | 0.09 |
| Social emotion score | −0.75 (−3.02, 1.52) | 0.51 | −0.88 (−3.29, 1.53) | 0.46 |
a Standard errors are clustered at the natural village level and adjusted for village fixed effect. b Regression estimates from multivariate linear models adjusted for gender, age, birth weight, age and education of mother, whether mother is primary caregiver, family income, and village fixed effect.
Multivariate regression for the self-reported frequency of prenatal exposure to ETS on child development in rural Guizhou province.
| Dependent Variables | Unadjusted Analysis (Packs of Cigarettes per Week) a | Adjusted Analysis (Packs of Cigarettes per Week) a,b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient (95% CI) | Coefficient (95% CI) | |||
| Cognition score | −0.33 (−0.80, 0.14) | 0.17 | −0.33 (−0.76, 0.11) | 0.14 |
| Language score | −0.45 (−0.82, −0.08) | 0.02 | −0.48 (−0.87, −0.09) | 0.02 |
| Motor score | −0.27 (−0.71, 0.17) | 0.22 | −0.31 (−0.70, 0.08) | 0.12 |
| Social emotion score | 0.002 (−0.32, 0.33) | 0.99 | −0.002 (−0.36, 0.36) | 0.99 |
a Standard errors are clustered at the natural village level and adjusted for village fixed effect. b Regression estimates from multivariate linear models adjusted for gender, age, birth weight, age, and education of mother, whether mother is primary caregiver, family income, and village fixed effect.
Results of unadjusted and adjusted regressions on early development of children in rural Guizhou province.
| Independent Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient (95% CI) | Coefficient (95% CI) | |||
| Panel A: Cognition score | ||||
| Prenatal exposure to ETS | −2.75 (−5.40, −0.11) | 0.04 | −3.41 (−6.39, −0.42) | 0.03 |
| Child characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Household characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Constant | Y | Y | ||
| Frequency of prenatal exposure to ETS | −0.33 (−0.80, 0.14) | 0.17 | 0.33 (−0.76, 0.11) | 0.14 |
| Child characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Household characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Constant | Y | Y | ||
| Panel B: Language score | ||||
| Prenatal exposure to ETS | −2.62 (−5.36, 0.13) | 0.06 | −3.01 (−5.93, −0.09) | 0.04 |
| Child characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Household characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Constant | Y | Y | ||
| Frequency of prenatal exposure to ETS | −0.45 (−0.82, −0.08) | 0.02 | −0.48 (−0.87, −0.09) | 0.02 |
| Child characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Household characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Constant | Y | Y | ||
| Panel C: Motor score | ||||
| Prenatal exposure to ETS | −2.78 (−5.74, 0.71) | 0.06 | −2.52 (−5.43, 0.38) | 0.09 |
| Child characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Household characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Constant | Y | Y | ||
| Frequency of prenatal exposure to ETS | −0.27 (−0.71, 0.17) | 0.22 | −0.31 (−0.70, 0.08) | 0.12 |
| Child characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Household characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Constant | Y | Y | ||
| Panel D: Social emotion score | ||||
| Prenatal exposure to ETS | −0.75 (−3.02, 1.52) | 0.51 | −0.88 (−3.29, 1.53) | 0.46 |
| Child characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Household characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Constant | Y | Y | ||
| Frequency of prenatal exposure to ETS | 0.002 (−0.32, 0.33) | 0.99 | −0.002 (−0.36, 0.36) | 0.99 |
| Child characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Household characteristics | N | Y | ||
| Constant | Y | Y | ||
Data source: Authors’ survey; Notes: Y denotes that these confounding variables are included in the regression; N denotes that these confounding variables are not included in the regression. Child characteristics: gender, age in month, and low birth weight (yes/no); Mother characteristics: age, and education attainment; Household characteristics: mother is the primary caregiver (yes/no), and family income in the last year.
Results of regressions with different confounding variables on early development of children in rural Guizhou province.
| Independent Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient (95% CI) | Coefficient (95% CI) | Coefficient | ||||
| Panel A: Cognition score | ||||||
| Prenatal exposure to ETS (Yes = 1; No = 0) | −3.41 | 0.02 | −2.71 | 0.05 | −3.00 | 0.04 |
| Child characteristics | Y | N | N | |||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | N | |||
| Household characteristics | N | N | Y | |||
| Constant | Y | Y | Y | |||
| Frequency of prenatal exposure to ETS | −0.33 | 0.14 | −0.32 | 0.17 | −0.33 | 0.14 |
| Child characteristics | Y | N | N | |||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | N | |||
| Household characteristics | N | N | Y | |||
| Constant | Y | Y | Y | |||
| Panel B: Language score | ||||||
| Prenatal exposure to ETS | −2.97 | 0.04 | −2.61 | 0.07 | −2.89 | 0.05 |
| Child characteristics | Y | N | N | |||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | N | |||
| Household characteristics | N | N | Y | |||
| Constant | Y | Y | Y | |||
| Frequency of prenatal exposure to ETS | −0.48 | 0.01 | −0.45 | 0.02 | −0.46 | 0.02 |
| Child characteristics | Y | N | N | |||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | N | |||
| Household characteristics | N | N | Y | |||
| Constant | Y | Y | Y | |||
| Panel C: Motor score | ||||||
| Prenatal exposure to ETS | −0.32 | 0.11 | −0.26 | 0.24 | −0.28 | 0.20 |
| Child characteristics | Y | N | N | |||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | N | |||
| Household characteristics | N | N | Y | |||
| Constant | Y | Y | Y | |||
| Frequency of prenatal exposure to ETS | −0.32 | 0.11 | −0.26 | 0.24 | −0.28 | 0.20 |
| Child characteristics | Y | N | N | |||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | N | |||
| Household characteristics | N | N | Y | |||
| Constant | Y | Y | Y | |||
| Panel D: Social emotion score | ||||||
| Prenatal exposure to ETS | −0.87 | 0.47 | −0.74 | 0.52 | −0.91 | 0.43 |
| Child characteristics | Y | N | N | |||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | N | |||
| Household characteristics | N | N | Y | |||
| Constant | Y | Y | Y | |||
| Frequency of prenatal exposure to ETS | −0.0001 | 1.00 | −0.006 | 0.97 | −0.13 | 0.94 |
| Child characteristics | Y | N | N | |||
| Mother characteristics | N | Y | N | |||
| Household characteristics | N | N | Y | |||
| Constant | Y | Y | Y | |||
Data source: Authors’ survey; Notes: Y denotes that these confounding variables are included in the regression; N denotes that these confounding variables are not included in the regression. Child characteristics: gender, age in month, and low birth weight (yes/no); Mother characteristics: age, and education attainment; Household characteristics: mother is the primary caregiver (yes/no), and family income in the last year.