| Literature DB >> 30558187 |
Jinlan Lu1, Ling Liu2, Xingyu Zhu3, Li Wu4, Zhipeng Chen5,6, Zisheng Xu7, Weidong Li8,9.
Abstract
Qing'e Pills is a Chinese traditional herbal product, which is often used to strengthen muscles and bones in TCM (traditional Chinese Medicine) practice. Its two main component herbs, namely, Cortex Eucommiae and Fructus Psoraleae are both required to be salt-fried according to TCM theory. We have evaluated the effects of salt-frying treated herbs on Caco-2 cell uptake behavior for those active ingredients of Qing'e Pills. By investigating of various variables, including MTT, temperature, inhibitors, pH, salt concentration and herb processing methods, we tried to clarify whether the salt-processing on herbs was necessary or not. Results showed that, compared to other processing methods, the salt-frying process significantly (p < 0.01) enhanced the absorption of effective components of Qing'e Pills. The way that psoralen, isopsoralen, psoralenoside and geniposide acid entered Caco-2 cells at low concentrations was via passive diffusion. These components were not substrates of P-glycoprotein. It demonstrated that the salt-frying process not only enhanced the concentration of active components in herb extract, but also changed their absorption behaviors. Nevertheless, the mechanism of absorption behavior changing needs to be further investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Caco-2 cell; Qing’e Pills; absorption; salt-fried process
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30558187 PMCID: PMC6321031 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23123321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Representative multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) chromatograms of (1) Psoralenoside (PO), (2) Psoralen (P), (3) Isopsoralen (IP), (4) Escoparone, (5) Geniposide acid (GPA) and (6) Rhein in rat plasma. (A) Blank cell lysate, (B) cell lysate spiked with the standards and internal standard (IS), (C) sample collected from cells treated with standards.
Precision and accuracy of four analytes in cell lysate.
| Analyte | Added Conc. (ng/mL) | Intra-Day | Inter-Day | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured (ng/mL) | Precision (%) | Accuracy (%) | Measured (ng/mL) | Precision (%) | Accuracy (%) | ||
| P | 10 | 9.65 ± 0.48 | 4.97 | ~3.47 | 9.71 ± 0.77 | 7.95 | ~2.87 |
| 100 | 96.90 ± 5.42 | 5.59 | ~3.10 | 95.70 ± 5.29 | 5.53 | ~4.30 | |
| 400 | 390.92 ± 15.62 | 3.99 | ~2.27 | 382.98 ± 17.44 | 4.55 | ~4.26 | |
| IP | 10 | 9.99 ± 0.77 | 7.72 | ~0.05 | 9.45 ± 0.91 | 9.60 | ~5.49 |
| 100 | 96.44 ± 6.67 | 6.91 | ~3.56 | 97.83 ± 5.25 | 5.36 | ~2.17 | |
| 400 | 376.78 ± 13.06 | 3.47 | ~5.80 | 380.21 ± 22.16 | 5.95 | ~4.95 | |
| PO | 10 | 9.35 ± 0.60 | 6.45 | ~6.54 | 9.36 ± 0.69 | 7.35 | ~6.39 |
| 100 | 93.69 ± 6.86 | 7.32 | ~6.31 | 92.94 ± 6.86 | 7.39 | ~7.06 | |
| 400 | 378.12 ± 37.30 | 9.87 | ~5.47 | 380.85 ± 25.78 | 6.77 | ~4.79 | |
| GPA | 10 | 9.48 ± 0.66 | 6.95 | ~5.23 | 9.52 ± 0.74 | 7.81 | ~4.78 |
| 100 | 97.42 ± 7.21 | 7.40 | ~2.58 | 96.78 ± 8.14 | 8.41 | ~3.22 | |
| 400 | 380.40 ± 18.73 | 4.92 | ~4.90 | 379.85 ± 18.42 | 4.85 | ~5.04 |
Recovery and matrix effect of analytes and IS.
| Analyte | Added Conc. (ng/mL) | Extraction Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | Matrix Effect (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | 10 | 91.85 ± 7.63 | 8.31 | 87.96 ± 3.85 | 4.37 |
| 100 | 85.51 ± 5.95 | 6.96 | 92.24 ± 1.55 | 1.68 | |
| 400 | 89.07 ± 7.39 | 8.30 | 97.09 ± 6.95 | 7.16 | |
| IP | 10 | 97.82 ± 4.98 | 5.09 | 92.42 ± 7.66 | 8.29 |
| 100 | 77.19 ± 2.15 | 2.79 | 90.89 ± 2.66 | 2.92 | |
| 400 | 78.82 ± 4.75 | 6.03 | 85.40 ± 7.30 | 8.55 | |
| PO | 10 | 80.92 ± 6.60 | 8.16 | 87.40 ± 7.63 | 8.73 |
| 100 | 81.09 ± 3.89 | 4.79 | 84.82 ± 7.40 | 8.73 | |
| 400 | 87.26 ± 3.90 | 4.47 | 96.30 ± 5.84 | 6.06 | |
| GPA | 10 | 82.11 ± 7.34 | 8.94 | 87.43 ± 5.30 | 6.06 |
| 100 | 81.63 ± 5.13 | 6.28 | 84.01 ± 4.97 | 5.92 | |
| 400 | 79.58 ± 5.78 | 7.26 | 94.77 ± 3.71 | 3.91 | |
| Escoparone | 10 | 88.02 ± 1.93 | 2.19 | 90.81 ± 4.50 | 4.96 |
| 100 | 85.59 ± 3.12 | 3.64 | 92.32 ± 4.35 | 4.71 | |
| 400 | 88.69 ± 3.70 | 4.17 | 93.60 ± 3.91 | 4.18 | |
| Rhein | 10 | 90.63 ± 3.88 | 4.29 | 92.54 ± 3.19 | 3.45 |
| 100 | 95.16 ± 1.15 | 1.21 | 93.37 ± 3.24 | 3.47 | |
| 400 | 88.09 ± 3.90 | 4.43 | 92.86 ± 5.76 | 6.20 |
Stability of four analytes in cell lysate.
| Analyte | Concentration (ng/mL) | Three Freeze-Thaw Cycles | Short-Term Stability | Long-Term Stability | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured (ng/mL) | RSD (%) | Measured (ng/mL) | RSD (%) | Measured (ng/mL) | RSD (%) | ||
| P | 10 | 9.69 ± 0.53 | 5.45 | 9.78 ± 0.72 | 7.35 | 9.25 ± 1.01 | 10.9 |
| 100 | 98.35 ± 1.45 | 1.47 | 96.17 ± 5.93 | 6.16 | 98.14 ± 7.09 | 7.22 | |
| 400 | 389.47 ± 42.05 | 10.8 | 385.09 ± 27.31 | 7.09 | 374.30 ± 24.02 | 6.42 | |
| IP | 10 | 9.84 ± 0.26 | 2.69 | 9.81 ± 0.95 | 9.65 | 9.36 ± 0.80 | 8.57 |
| 100 | 95.75 ± 8.97 | 9.37 | 95.76 ± 8.33 | 8.70 | 94.28 ± 9.05 | 9.60 | |
| 400 | 388.26 ± 6.30 | 1.62 | 383.88 ± 24.55 | 6.40 | 387.98 ± 25.72 | 6.63 | |
| PO | 10 | 9.69 ± 0.94 | 9.72 | 9.58 ± 1.36 | 14.2 | 9.65 ± 1.14 | 11.9 |
| 100 | 96.49 ± 7.73 | 8.01 | 94.61 ± 6.43 | 6.80 | 94.08 ± 9.27 | 9.85 | |
| 400 | 381.68 ± 18.74 | 4.91 | 385.48 ± 18.81 | 4.88 | 378.67 ± 35.33 | 9.33 | |
| GPA | 10 | 9.09 ± 0.52 | 5.76 | 9.30 ± 0.73 | 7.81 | 9.63 ± 1.02 | 10.6 |
| 100 | 95.25 ± 8.83 | 9.27 | 96.83 ± 10.48 | 10.8 | 95.38 ± 5.13 | 5.38 | |
| 400 | 367.97 ± 13.72 | 3.73 | 387.02 ± 14.78 | 3.82 | 384.28 ± 29.53 | 7.68 | |
Figure 2The effects of drug-contained medium with different concentration on Caco-2 cell proliferation activity. Significance: vs. blank medium: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 3Cellular uptake of the 4 component compounds of various drug-contained medium of extracts of Qing’e Pills at different concentrations.
Figure 4The uptake of the 4 component compounds at different temperatures.
Figure 5The cellular uptake of the 4 component compounds with the present of inhibitors.
Figure 6The cellular uptake of the 4 component compounds at different pH values. Significance: vs. blank medium: ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7Cellular uptake of the 4 component compounds at different salt concentrations. Significance: vs. blank medium: **p < 0.01.
Figure 8The cellular uptake of the 4 component compounds in drug-contained medium of various extracts of Qing’e Pills. Significance: vs. raw group (blank group): *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.