Literature DB >> 30557806

Fine particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) at an urban site of Wuhan, central China: Characteristics, potential sources and cancer risks apportionment.

Yuan Zhang1, Huang Zheng2, Li Zhang3, Zezhou Zhang1, Xinli Xing4, Shihua Qi5.   

Abstract

Levels, compositions, sources, and cancer risks of fine particle (PM2.5)-bound PAHs were investigated at an urban site of Wuhan, Central China. Totally 115 PM2.5 samples collected during four seasons from 2014 to 2015 were analyzed for 16 USEPA priority PAHs. The annual average of PM2.5 and total PAHs were 106 ± 41.7 μg m-3 and 25.1 ± 19.4 ng m-3, respectively. The seasonal levels of PM2.5 and PAHs varied in a similar trend, with the highest concentrations in winter and the lowest in summer. PM2.5-bound PAHs under different pollution level was discussed and the highest average PAH levels were found at a moderate (115-150 μg m-3) air quality level. Three sources including coal combustion and biomass burning, petrogenic source, and vehicle emissions were extracted and quantified by the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model, accounting for 22.7 ± 21.3%, 34.4 ± 29.0% and 42.9 ± 31.3% of the total PAHs, respectively. The potential source contribution function (PSCF) and the concentration-weighted trajectory (CWT) were combined to explore the geographic origins of PAHs. The spatial distributions of coal combustion and biomass burning, petrogenic source, and vehicle emissions were well correlated with medium molecular weight (MMW), low molecular weight (LMW) and high molecular weight (HMW) PAHs, respectively. Results of PSCF and CWT indicated that the long-distance transport form north of Wuhan as far as northern and eastern of China was higher than that from the southern China while the contribution of local areas was higher than those from the long-range transport. The overall lifetime lung cancer risk (LLCR) via inhalation exposure to PM2.5-bound PAHs was estimated as 3.03 × 10-4, with vehicle emissions contributed 57.1% (1.6 × 10-4) to the total risk on average, followed by coal combustion and biomass burning (31.0%, 9.6 × 10-5), and petrogenic source (11.9%, 3.6 × 10-5).
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer risk assessment; Fine particle; Geographic origins; PAHs; Positive matrix factorization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30557806     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  6 in total

1.  Variation of pollution sources and health effects on air pollution before and during COVID-19 pandemic in Linfen, Fenwei Plain.

Authors:  Weijie Liu; Yao Mao; Tianpeng Hu; Mingming Shi; Jiaquan Zhang; Yuan Zhang; Shaofei Kong; Shihua Qi; Xinli Xing
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 8.431

2.  Health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) adsorbed in PM2.5 and PM10 in a region of Arequipa, Peru.

Authors:  Adriana E Larrea Valdivia; Juan A Reyes Larico; Jimena Salcedo Peña; Eduardo D Wannaz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The Health Risks of Airborne Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): Upper North Thailand.

Authors:  Jira Kongpran; Wissanupong Kliengchuay; Sarima Niampradit; Narut Sahanavin; Weerayuth Siriratruengsuk; Kraichat Tantrakarnapa
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  Characteristics, Source Contributions, and Source-Specific Health Risks of PM2.5-Bound Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons for Senior Citizens during the Heating Season in Tianjin, China.

Authors:  Nan Zhang; Chunmei Geng; Jia Xu; Liwen Zhang; Penghui Li; Jinbao Han; Shuang Gao; Xinhua Wang; Wen Yang; Zhipeng Bai; Wenge Zhang; Bin Han
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Alkylated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Are the Largest Contributor to Polycyclic Aromatic Compound Concentrations in the Topsoil of Huaibei Coalfield, China.

Authors:  Yahui Qian; Zhenpeng Xu; Xiuping Hong; Zhonggeng Luo; Xiulong Gao; Cai Tie; Handong Liang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Carbon nanotube filler enhances incinerated thermoplastics-induced cytotoxicity and metabolic disruption in vitro.

Authors:  Jayme P Coyle; Raymond C Derk; Tiffany G Kornberg; Dilpreet Singh; Jake Jensen; Sherri Friend; Robert Mercer; Todd A Stueckle; Philip Demokritou; Yon Rojanasakul; Liying W Rojanasakul
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 9.400

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.