| Literature DB >> 30555557 |
Yujing Tan1, Kelin Lin1, Yang Zhao1, Qijing Wu1, Dongping Chen2, Jin Wang3, Yanxiao Liang4, Jingyu Li5, Jiazhu Hu6, Hao Wang7, Yajing Liu1, Shuyi Zhang1, Wanming He1, Qiong Huang1, Xingbin Hu1, Zhiqi Yao1, Bishan Liang1, Wangjun Liao1, Min Shi1.
Abstract
Omental metastasis occurs frequently in gastric cancer (GC) and is considered one of the major causes ofEntities:
Keywords: PITPNC1; anoikis resistance; fatty acid oxidation; gastric cancer; omental metastasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30555557 PMCID: PMC6276097 DOI: 10.7150/thno.28219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Relationships between PITPNC1 expression and clinicopathological parameters in Stage I-IV GC patients.
| PITPNC1 High | PITPNC1 Low | PITPNC1 Negative | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥55 | 62(55.86) | 25 | 24 | 13 | 0.3401 |
| <55 | 49(44.14) | 19 | 23 | 7 | |
| Male | 74(66.67) | 31 | 32 | 11 | 0.2515 |
| Female | 37(33.33) | 13 | 15 | 9 | |
| I | 12(10.81) | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0.0001*** |
| II | 34(30.63) | 5 | 18 | 11 | |
| III | 31(27.92) | 13 | 13 | 5 | |
| IV | 34(30.63) | 22 | 6 | 6 | |
| T1 | 8(7.21) | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0.0023** |
| T2 | 22(19.82) | 9 | 11 | 2 | |
| T3 | 39(35.13) | 12 | 15 | 12 | |
| T4 | 42(37.84) | 20 | 14 | 8 | |
| N0 | 33(29.73) | 9 | 16 | 8 | 0.0029** |
| N1 | 20(18.02) | 8 | 8 | 4 | |
| N2 | 49(44.14) | 22 | 16 | 11 | |
| N3 | 9(8.11) | 5 | 3 | 1 | |
| M0 | 77(69.37) | 22 | 37 | 18 | 0.0001*** |
| M1 | 34(30.63) | 22 | 6 | 6 | |
| Well | 15(13.51) | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0.0001*** |
| Moderate | 33(29.72) | 14 | 17 | 2 | |
| Poor | 63(56.77) | 21 | 25 | 17 | |
| No | 29(37.66) | 5 | 16 | 8 | 0.0166* |
| Yes | 48(62.34) | 17 | 21 | 10 | |
| 10(29.41) | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0.0001* | |
| 24(70.59) | 19 | 3 | 2 |
*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis for mortality in stage I-III and IV GC patients.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | HR(95%CI) | HR(95%CI) | ||
| I-III stage | ||||
| Age(≥55/<55) | 0.73 (0.41-1.31) | 0.290 | 0.71(0.39-1.29) | 0.255 |
| Gender(Male/Female) | 1.25 (0.69-2.26) | 0.460 | 1.08(0.56-2.09) | 0.829 |
| TNM stage(I-III) | 2.22(1.41-3.51) | 0.001** | 1.48(0.64-3.38) | 0.359 |
| Tumor invasion (T1-T4) | 1.49(1.08-2.07) | 0.016* | 1.44(0.90-2.30) | 0.133 |
| Lymph node metastasis (N0-N3) | 1.46(1.12-1.90) | 0.005** | 1.25(0.81-1.91) | 0.300 |
| PITPNC1 expression (Negative/Low/High) | 1.63(1.07-2.46) | 0.020* | 1.57(1.02-2.43) | 0.043* |
| Tumor differentiation (Well/Moderate/Poor) | 1.17(0.78-1.74) | 0.440 | 1.55(0.98-2.45) | 0.059 |
| IV stage | ||||
| Age (≥55/<55) | 1.95(0.86-4.41) | 0.109 | 2.15(0.91-5.11) | 0.080 |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 0.90(0.35-2.31) | 0.829 | 0.50(0.17-1.47) | 0.208 |
| Tumor invasion (T1-T4) | 1.34(0.82-2.10) | 0.242 | 1.69(0.91-3.16) | 0.094 |
| Lymph node metastasis (N0-N3) | 1.80(0.78-4.16) | 0.170 | 2.59(0.88-7.69) | 0.086 |
| PITPNC1 expression (Negative/Low/High) | 2.07(1.06-4.04) | 0.032* | 2.51(1.19-5.32) | 0.016* |
| Tumor differentiation (Well/Moderate/Poor) | 1.12(0.63-1.98 | 0.709 | 1.20(0.65-2.23) | 0.554 |
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; *P<0.05, **P<0.01.