Literature DB >> 23184289

Perigastric tumor deposits in primary gastric cancer: implications for patient prognosis and staging.

Hye Seung Lee1, Hee Eun Lee, Han-Kwang Yang, Woo Ho Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metastatic nodules in perigastric adipose tissue without evidence of lymph node tissue have been reported in gastric cancers. However, the morphological features and clinical significance of perigastric tumor deposits (TD) have not been clarified in gastric cancers.
METHODS: To demonstrate the clinical implication of perigastric TD, 653 consecutive gastric cancer patients were enrolled and all of their slides were reviewed. Separate tumor nodules in the perigastric fat were classified as perigastric TD and correlated with clinicopathologic features and patient survival.
RESULTS: Perigastric TD were observed in 156 (23.9 %) of 653 patients. Perigastric TD were associated with synchronous distant metastasis (p < 0.001), independently of depth and venous invasion. There was a significant difference between the overall survival of those with and without TD by univariate (p < 0.001) and multivariate (p = 0.001) survival analyses. However, distant metastasis or patient prognosis could not be predicted by the morphologic patterns of the TD (p > 0.05). When TD without lymph node tissue and lymph node metastasis were recorded separately, TD were observed in 13 node-negative patients. The overall survival of node-negative patients with TD was significantly worse than that of node-negative patients without TD (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Perigastric TD significantly correlated with distant metastasis and satisfactorily predicted patient outcomes independently of invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, and other clinicopathologic factors. Our findings suggest that perigastric TD should be included in the staging of patients with gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23184289     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2692-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  17 in total

1.  Extra-perigastric Extranodal Metastasis is a Significant Prognostic Factor in Node-Positive Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Akiko Tonouchi; Masato Sugano; Masanori Tokunaga; Shizuki Sugita; Masahiro Watanabe; Reo Sato; Akio Kaito; Tetsuo Akimoto; Atsushi Ochiai; Takahiro Kinoshita; Takeshi Kuwata
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Prognostic value of diffuse versus intestinal histotype in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Rosa Berenato; Luca Turati; Alessia Mennitto; Francesca Steccanella; Marta Caporale; Pierpaolo Dallera; Filippo de Braud; Ezio Pezzica; Maria Di Bartolomeo; Giovanni Sgroi; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Filippo Pietrantonio; Sandro Barni
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

3.  Prognostic Importance of Tumor Deposits in the Ipsilateral Axillary Region of Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Merih Guray Durak; Tulay Canda; Betul Yilmaz; Nazli Sena Seker; Seda Eryigit Kokkoz; Zumre Arican Alicikus; Nesrin Akturk; Ilknur Bilkay Gorken; Hulya Ellidokuz; Ali Ibrahim Sevinc; Serdar Saydam; Sulen Sarioglu
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 4.  Digestive cancer surgery in the era of sentinel node and epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Nadia Peparini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Tumor deposit indicates worse prognosis than metastatic lymph node in gastric cancer: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Jianan Tan; Bin Yang; Zhimeng Xu; Shengning Zhou; Zhitao Chen; Jing Huang; Han Gao; Senyou Zheng; Liqiang Wen; Fanghai Han
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

6.  An application study of CT perfusion imaging in assessing metastatic involvement of perigastric lymph nodes in patients with T1 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zongqiong Sun; Shudong Hu; Jie Li; Teng Wang; Zhihui Xie; Linfang Jin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Prediction of T stage in gastric carcinoma by enhanced CT and oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Tao Yu; Xinling Wang; Zilong Zhao; Fan Liu; Xiaoting Liu; Yan Zhao; Yahong Luo
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Improvement of T stage precision by integration of surgical and pathological staging in radically resected stage pT3-pT4b gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Hu Wang; Kai Li; Hao Xu; Zhe Sun; Zhen-Ning Wang; Hui-Mian Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11

9.  Prognostic significance and role in TNM stage of tumor deposits in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Qi-Xin Shang; Yu-Shang Yang; Li-Yan Xu; En-Min Li; Wei-Peng Hu; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Clinicopathological factors associated with the presence of tumor deposits in resected gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Oscar Paredes Torres; Sofia Prado Cucho; Luis Taxa Rojas; Carlos Luque-Vasquez; Ivan Chavez; Eduardo Payet Meza; Eloy Ruiz Figueroa; Francisco Berrospi Espinoza
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.