Literature DB >> 30554980

Development and testing of acoustically-matched hydrogel-based electrodes for simultaneous EMG-ultrasound detection.

A Botter1, M Beltrandi2, G L Cerone3, M Gazzoni3, T M M Vieira3.   

Abstract

In this manuscript we describe the development and testing of a bipolar electrode for the simultaneous acquisition of ultrasound (US) images and surface electromyograms (EMGs) from the same muscle region. The developed electrode (bEMG-US) consists of two circular sensing regions (20 mm diameter) with fixed inter-electrode distance (3.5 cm, center-to-center). Both the sensing regions and the external structure of the electrode are made of hydrogel layers separated by insulating materials. The electrical properties (i.e., impedance and noise of the electrode-skin interface) and the quality of EMGs detected with the developed electrodes during electrically elicited contractions were assessed and compared with those provided by commercially available EMG electrodes. The effect of the bEMG-US electrode on US images was evaluated by comparing images detected from the same muscle region with and without the electrode interposed between the US probe and the skin. Tests on five subjects showed that the electrode-skin impedance of bEMG-US electrodes was higher than that of conventional EMG electrodes (mean (range): 15.6 (8.5-21.1) kΩ vs. 8.2 (4.9-16.5) kΩ). Despite higher impedance values, both electrode systems provided comparable, electrode-skin noise levels (1.4 (1.1-1.7) µV vs. 1.3 (1.0-1.5) µV) and M waves (normalized mean square error: 2.6 (0.6-6.8)%). The quality of US images detected with and without the bEMG-US electrode between the US probe and the skin was comparable, as demonstrated by the low errors in the estimation of anatomical variables in the two experimental conditions (range: (0.37-2.35) deg for pennation angle and (-0.31-0.1) cm for muscle thickness). Results demonstrate that bEMG-US can be used to acquire concurrently EMGs and US images from the same muscle region with a negligible effect on the quality of the two detected signals, thus allowing for a simultaneous, multimodal evaluation of muscle activation.
Copyright © 2018 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrode; Electrode-skin impedance; Muscle architecture; Surface EMG; Ultrasound imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30554980     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  3 in total

1.  Evaluating Electromyography and Sonomyography Sensor Fusion to Estimate Lower-Limb Kinematics Using Gaussian Process Regression.

Authors:  Kaitlin G Rabe; Nicholas P Fey
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of Sensor Fusion Methods Using Peripheral Bio-Signals for Human Intention Decoding.

Authors:  Anany Dwivedi; Helen Groll; Philipp Beckerle
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  The evolving role of surface electromyography in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review.

Authors:  J Bashford; K Mills; C Shaw
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.708

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.