| Literature DB >> 32044239 |
J Bashford1, K Mills2, C Shaw2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an adult-onset neurodegenerative disease that leads to inexorable motor decline and a median survival of three years from symptom onset. Surface EMG represents a major technological advance that has been harnessed in the development of novel neurophysiological biomarkers. We have systematically reviewed the current application of surface EMG techniques in ALS.Entities:
Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Biomarker; Motor neuron disorders; Surface electromyography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32044239 PMCID: PMC7083223 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.12.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Neurophysiol ISSN: 1388-2457 Impact factor: 3.708
Fig. 1The range of (HD) SEMG techniques in ALS. CI, clustering index; HD-MUNE, high-density motor unit number estimate; (HD) SEMG, high-density surface electromyography; MFCV, muscle fibre conduction velocity; MScanFit, compound muscle action potential scan; MU, motor unit; MUNIX, motor unit number index; SPiQE, surface potential quantification engine.
Fig. 2Simultaneous needle and high-density surface EMG recordings in ALS. Measurements were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (muscle power 4+/5) of an ALS patient. a. Motor unit potentials during light abduction of the index finger against resistance; b. Fasciculation potentials captured during rest; c. Experimental setup with 25 × 0.30 mm (30G) concentric needle electrode (Ambu Neuroline) and 64-channel high-density surface sensor (TMS International, Netherlands); d. Results from motor unit decomposition (Chen and Zhou, 2016) of motor unit X (seen in ‘a’) across the 64-channel array. Note channel number in top left corner of each box and peak-trough amplitude in bottom right corner for each channel. The photograph in ‘c’ has been orientated to show direct anatomical relationship with each channel in ‘d’. Time and amplitude scale bars are displayed.
The demonstrated role of (HD) SEMG techniques in ALS.
| Diagnosis | Prognosis | Monitoring | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isolated discharges were more common in ALS1 | Not assessed | Not assessed | |
| 1. MUNIX was lower in ALS than in HCs2-5 with estimated diagnostic accuracies of 78–95%6–8 | MUNE/MUNIX stratified fast | MUNE/MUNIX correlated with clinical and pre-clinical decline2–4,9–13 | |
| MDs were more common | Presence of MDs predicted | Not assessed | |
| 1. No difference in inter-fasciculation intervals between ALS and BFS17 | Fasciculation frequency correlated with muscle weakness but not disease duration19 | Fasciculation frequency did not correlate with clinical decline20 | |
| MFCV was increased in ALS | Not assessed | Not assessed | |
| IZ length was increased in ALS | Not assessed | Not assessed | |
| These measures distinguished ALS from HCs with 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity23 | Not assessed | Not assessed |
ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; BFS, benign fasciculation syndrome; HC, healthy control; IZ, innervation zone; MD, multiplet discharge; MFCV, muscle fibre conduction velocity; (HD-)MUNE, (high-density) motor unit number estimate; MU, motor unit; MUNIX, motor unit number index. References: 1Sleutjes et al. (2016); 2Boekestein et al. (2012); 3Furtula et al. (2013); 4Fukada et al. (2016); 5Grimaldi et al. (2017); 6Escorcio-Bezerra et al. (2016); 7Jacobsen et al. (2018); 8Kim et al. (2016); 9Neuwirth et al. (2015); 10van Dijk et al. (2010); 11Neuwirth et al. (2010); 12Felice et al. (1997); 13Neuwirth et al. (2017); 14Sleutjes et al. (2015); 15Maathuis et al. (2012); 16Sleutjes et al. (2016); 17Kleine et al. (2012); 18de Carvalho and Swash (2016); 19Mateen et al. (2008); 20de Carvalho and Swash (2016); 21van der Hoeven et al. (1993); 22Jahanmiri-Nezhad et al. (2015); 23Zhang et al. (2014).