| Literature DB >> 30552009 |
Cyril Barinka1, Zora Novakova2, Niyada Hin3, Daniel Bím4, Dana V Ferraris5, Bridget Duvall3, Gabriel Kabarriti3, Reiji Tsukamoto3, Milos Budesinsky4, Lucia Motlova2, Camilo Rojas6, Barbara S Slusher7, Tibor András Rokob8, Lubomír Rulíšek9, Takashi Tsukamoto10.
Abstract
A series of carbamate-based inhibitors of glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII) were designed and synthesized using ZJ-43, N-[[[(1S)-1-carboxy-3-methylbutyl]amino]carbonyl]-l-glutamic acid, as a molecular template in order to better understand the impact of replacing one of the two nitrogen atoms in the urea-based GCPII inhibitor with an oxygen atom. Compound 7 containing a C-terminal 2-oxypentanedioic acid was more potent than compound 5 containing a C-terminal glutamic acid (2-aminopentanedioic acid) despite GCPII's preference for peptides containing an N-terminal glutamate as substrates. Subsequent crystallographic analysis revealed that ZJ-43 and its two carbamate analogs 5 and 7 with the same (S,S)-stereochemical configuration adopt a nearly identical binding mode while (R,S)-carbamate analog 8 containing a d-leucine forms a less extensive hydrogen bonding network. QM and QM/MM calculations have identified no specific interactions in the GCPII active site that would distinguish ZJ-43 from compounds 5 and 7 and attributed the higher potency of ZJ-43 and compound 7 to the free energy changes associated with the transfer of the ligand from bulk solvent to the protein active site as a result of the lower ligand strain energy and solvation/desolvation energy. Our findings underscore a broader range of factors that need to be taken into account in predicting ligand-protein binding affinity. These insights should be of particular importance in future efforts to design and develop GCPII inhibitors for optimal inhibitory potency.Entities:
Keywords: Crystal structure; Glutamate carboxypeptidase II; Metallopeptidase; Prostate-specific membrane antigen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30552009 PMCID: PMC6374116 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.11.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioorg Med Chem ISSN: 0968-0896 Impact factor: 3.461