| Literature DB >> 30551738 |
William J Liu1,2, Rongrong Zou1, Yongfei Hu3, Min Zhao3, Chuansong Quan2, Shuguang Tan3, Kai Luo1, Jing Yuan1, Haixia Zheng1, Jue Liu4, Min Liu4, Yuhai Bi1,3,5, Jinghua Yan3, Baoli Zhu3, Dayan Wang2, Guizhen Wu2, Lei Liu1, Kwok-Yung Yuen6, George F Gao7,8,9,10, Yingxia Liu11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacterial co-infection of patients suffering from influenza pneumonia is a key element that increases morbidity and mortality. The occurrence of Acinetobacter baumannii co-infection in patients with avian influenza A (H7N9) virus infection has been described as one of the most prevalent bacterial co-infections. However, the clinical and laboratory features of this entity of H7N9 and A. baumannii co-infection have not been systematically investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; Avian influenza A(H7N9) virus; Extensively drug-resistant bacteria; Immune responses; Nosocomial infection; Pneumonia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30551738 PMCID: PMC6295110 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3447-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Mutation information in A. baumannii SMGC-AB2 isolated from H7N9 patient B4a
| No. | Gene Annotation | ORF length | position (NT) | mutation (NT) | AA length | position (AA) | substitute (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | putative permease, YjgP/YjgQ family protein | 1101 bp | 164 | G → A | 366 | 55 | Arg → His |
| 2 | histidine kinase; PmrB | 1335 | 704 | C → T | 444 | 235 | Thr → Ile |
| 3 | Lipid A phosphoethanolamine transferase, associated with polymyxin resistance, PmrC | 1647 | 1598 | A → C | 548 | 533 | Lys → Thr |
| 4 | NAD-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase | 1575 | 421 | C → T | 524 | 141 | Leu → Leu |
| 5 | Large repetitive protein, type I secretion C-terminal target domain protein | 6657 | 547 | A → G | 2218 | 183 | Val → Ile |
| 6 | Large repetitive protein, type I secretion C-terminal target domain protein | 6657 | 874 | G → A | 2218 | 292 | Val → Ile |
| 7 | Large repetitive protein, type I secretion C-terminal target domain protein | 6657 | 876 | T → C | 2218 | 292 | Val → Ile |
| 8 | Contig C497 | 8383 (position) | C → T | Non-coding region | |||
aThe reference sequence is A. baumannii SMGC-AB1 isolated from H7N9 patient B4 isolated on Day 21 after disease onset. A. baumannii SMGC-AB2 was isolated from this patient B4 on Day 26 after disease onset
Fig. 1The occurrence of nosocomial A. baumannii infection in H7N9 patients during the timeline of the 2013–2014 H7N9 epidemic wave in the hospital. a. The weekly reported cases infected by H7N9 and A. baumannii, respectively, from December 2013 to April 2014 in Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital, Guangdong China. The first week to the fourth week of each month were denoted as W1 to W4. b. The linear correlation of weekly reported numbers of H7N9 patients and A. baumannii patients. c. The timeline of the laboratory test and clinical treatment of the H7N9 and A. baumannii co-infected patients. The corresponding dates for timeline were shown below as the horizontal axis. Flu: The persistent period for positive result of H7N9 RNA detected by RT-PCR; Baumannii: The period for A. baumannii positive; Admission: the date for the admission of the patient; Antivirus: the period for the anti-influenza drug therapy; Antibiotics: the period for the antibiotic use; Glucocorticoid: the period for glucocorticiod pulse therapy; Invasive mechanical ventilation: the period for the manipulation of invasive mechanical ventilation
Fig. 2The risk factors for H7N9-A. baumannii co-infection. a. The comparison of the manipulation of non-invasive ventilation (NV) and invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) between H7N9-A. baumannii co-infected cases (H7N9 + AB) and H7N9 control patients without bacterial co-infection (H7N9). b. The time from the disease onset to the use of antibiotics (Onset to use) and the total time for the antibiotic use (Use to stop) is compared between H7N9 + AB cases and H7N9 controls. c. The time from the disease onset to the use of glucocorticoid (Onset to use) and the total time for the glucocorticoid use (Use to stop) is compared between H7N9 + AB cases and H7N9 controls. d. The total dosages for glucocorticoid and gamma globulin compared between between H7N9 + AB cases and H7N9 controls
Fig. 3The disease severity of H7N9 patients co-infected by A. baumannii. a. The oxygenation index (OI, PaO2/FiO2) on admission compared between H7N9-A. baumannii co-infected cases (H7N9 + AB), H7N9 control patients without bacterial co-infection (H7N9), and A. baumannii infected control patients with pneumonia (AB group). b. The lowest PaO2/FiO2 of H7N9 + AB cases, H7N9 controls and A. baumannii controls during the disease process. c. The days for the PaO2/FiO2 abnormity of the three patient groups. d. The longitudinal variation of chest radiographs scores (SRC) during the disease process of H7N9 + AB patients with fatal outcome (Left), survived H7N9 + AB patients (Middle) and H7N9 infection without bacterial co-infection (Right). The SRC = 15 on day 20 was denoted as gray dash lines
Fig. 4Dysfunctional immunity in H7N9 patients co-infected by A. baumannii. The plasma cytokines IL-6 (a) and IL-8 (b) in the H7N9-A. baumannii co-infected patients (H7N9 + AB) are higher than the H7N9 control patients (H7N9 group) during week 2 (Day 8–14), week 3 (Day 15–21) and week 4 (Day 22–28) after the admission. In contrast, IL-6 and IL-8 in the H7N9 control patients were decreasing gradually from week 1 (Day 1–7) to week 4 (Day 22–28) after hospitalization. Through the analysis of T-lymphocyte subtypes, the ratio of T-cells in total white blood cells on admission (c) was compared between H7N9 + AB cases and H7N9 controls and A. baumannii pneumonia control patients (AB group). The ratio of CD4+ T-cells/CD8+ T-cells (d) was also calculated among cases and controls. The time for CD4+ T-cell count restoring was longer for H7N9 + AB patients (e). The CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts were compared between the co-infected cases and controls (f). The influenza virus-specific T-cell responses (g) were detected through ELISPOT by using the freshly-isolated PBMCs from the patients. H7N9-specific peptide pools and conserved peptide pools were used as the stimulators