| Literature DB >> 30549290 |
Robert A Weiss1, Jan Bernardy2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: While controlled thermal changes in subcutaneous tissue have been used to trigger apoptosis of fat cells and have been proven clinically efficacious, another mechanism of electromagnetic stress suggests that fat apoptosis could be achieved by a non-thermal manner as well. This animal model study investigates the use of a non-invasive high-intensity magnetic field device to induce apoptosis in fat cells.Entities:
Keywords: HIFEM; apoptosis; fat disruption; magnetic technology; non-thermal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30549290 PMCID: PMC6590311 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lasers Surg Med ISSN: 0196-8092 Impact factor: 4.025
Summary of Plasma Blood Parameters of the Treated and Control Animals
| Control | Treated | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Unit | Before | 1 hour Post‐Tx | 8 hours Post‐Tx | Before | 1 hour Post‐Tx | 8 hours Post‐Tx | Reference range (Min to Max) |
| ALT | µkat·l−1 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.50–1.00 |
| AST | µkat·l−1 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.10–1.00 |
| ALP | µkat·l−1 | 2.49 | 2.35 | 2.63 | 4.56 | 4.52 | 4.60 | 2.00–5.10 |
| CK | µkat·l−1 | 29.99 | 26.08 | 31.71 | 29.67 | 28.83 | 97.25 | 0.00–35.00 |
| LDH | µkat·l−1 | 10.94 | 11.04 | 10.29 | 13.84 | 13.74 | 18.74 | 3.90–11.50 |
| Glu | mmol·l−1 | 5.46 | 4.19 | 4.70 | 5.11 | 5.84 | 5.04 | 3.80–6.40 |
| Crea | µmol·l−1 | 114.85 | 109.62 | 138.78 | 130.36 | 125.47 | 129.27 | 88.00–145.00 |
| Urea | mmol·l−1 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4.88 | 4.88 | 6.06 | 3.00–6.00 |
| TP | g·l−1 | 60.21 | 57.27 | 59.88 | 60.71 | 61.01 | 59.28 | 60.00–85.00 |
| Alb | g·l−1 | 36.10 | 35.20 | 36.70 | 31.81 | 31.56 | 31.95 | 35.00–45.00 |
| TG | mmol·l−1 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.27 | 0.00–0.50 |
| Chol | mmol·l−1 | 2.32 | 2.41 | 2.67 | 2.40 | 2.37 | 2.29 | 2.00–3.30 |
| Ca | mmol·l−1 | 2.46 | 2.35 | 2.38 | 2.44 | 2.47 | 2.36 | 2.30–3.10 |
| Mg | mmol·l−1 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.50–1.20 |
| P | mmol·l−1 | 2.46 | 2.42 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 2.38 | 2.60 | 2.10–3.30 |
| Fe | µmol·l−1 | 19.80 | 21.30 | 20.80 | 21.65 | 22.25 | 18.65 | 18.00–35.00 |
| FFA | mmol·l−1 | 0.70 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 1.14 | 1.50 | 0.82 | 0.00–1.00 |
| IL6 | ng·l−1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00–5.50 |
| Glycerol | mg·l−1 | 3.06 | 3.83 | 4.79 | 10.36 | 11.03 | 4.68 | 0.00–10.00 |
Figure 1Histological examination of apoptosis in pig fat tissue (TUNEL method). Apoptotic nuclei are marked brown, while the intact nuclei are marked blue. There was an increase in the number of apoptotic nuclei after the treatment.
Figure 2Average AI (%) evaluated in each pig individually.
Figure 3Average AI (%). In treated subjects, there were on average 35.95% of apoptotic nuclei observed at 8 hours post‐tx. An asterisk symbol (*) marks the statistically significant difference against the baseline.
Results of RNA Apoptotic Markers Evaluation
| Control | Treated | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Function | Before | 1 hour Post‐Tx | 8 hours Post‐Tx | Before | 1 hour Post‐Tx | 8 Hours Post‐Tx |
| TNF‐α | P | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 5.84 | 0.16 |
| IL‐1β | P | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.20 |
| IL‐10 | A | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.51 | 0.11 |
| TIMP‐1 | A | 1.86 | 1.11 | 2.09 | 0.71 | 7.54 | 1.93 |
| TGF‐β1 | Both | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.51 | 1.30 | 0.30 |
| MMP 9 | P | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 5.21 | 0.17 |
| VEGFA | A | 1.13 | 1.56 | 0.81 | 1.36 | 2.28 | 0.59 |
| FGF‐7 | A | 0.33 | 0.86 | 1.47 | 0.57 | 3.97 | 2.79 |
| BAD | P | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.47 | 1.20 | 0.73 |
| BCL 2 | A | 1.32 | 1.27 | 1.47 | 3.23 | 3.86 | 1.59 |
| TRX‐2 | A | 11.93 | 18.13 | 13.39 | 11.77 | 73.98 | 16.63 |
The function of an evaluated marker can be Pro‐Apoptotic (P), Anti‐Apoptotic (A) or both (B). All values are expressed as a ratio to reference value.
Figure 4Increase of LDH catalytic activity in porcine serum levels.
Figure 5Increase of CK catalytic activity in porcine serum levels.