Literature DB >> 30548432

Consecutive influenza surveillance of neuraminidase mutations and neuraminidase inhibitor resistance in Japan.

Yong Chong1, Shinya Matsumoto2, Dongchon Kang2,3, Hideyuki Ikematsu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The large consumption of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) for the treatment of influenza virus infections places Japan at risk of becoming the epicenter of the global spread of NAI-resistant viruses.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify NA amino acid mutations of epidemic influenza viruses in Japan and their related NAI resistance.
METHODS: A total of 1791 samples, including 396 A/H1N1pdm09, 1117 A/H3N2, and 278 B isolates, were collected to determine of their 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50 ) values by NAIs (oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, and laninamivir) during the Japanese seasons from 2011-2012 to 2016-2017. Then, 380 samples including 49 A/H1N1pdm09, 251 A/H3N2, and 80 B isolates were sequenced for the entire NA genes.
RESULTS: Neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant A/H1N1pdm09 viruses were detected at a frequency of 1.3% (5/396 isolates) in the epidemic seasons. None of the A/H3N2 and B viruses developed resistance to any of the four NAIs during the six seasons. Only five and 13 AA mutations were detected in the NA catalytic sites of A/H1N1pdm09 and A/H3N2 viruses, respectively. No mutations were observed in the catalytic sites of B viruses. Four of the five mutations in the catalytic sites of A/H1N1pdm09 consisted of H275Y, which was related to high resistance to oseltamivir and peramivir. Most (10/13) of the catalytic site mutations in A/H3N2 were associated with MDCK-passaged induction (D151G/N). Finally, no mutations related to substantial NAI resistance were detected in the A/H3N2 and B viruses examined.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the NA catalytic sites of influenza viruses are well preserved. Even in Japan, no spread of NAI-resistant viruses has been observed, and A/H1N1pdm09 viruses carrying H275Y remain limited.
© 2018 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  influenza; mutation; neuraminidase; neuraminidase inhibitor; resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30548432      PMCID: PMC6379637          DOI: 10.1111/irv.12624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses        ISSN: 1750-2640            Impact factor:   4.380


INTRODUCTION

Seasonal influenza virus infections can cause high morbidity and mortality in humans, imposing a considerable socioeconomic burden. Although new functional drugs have been developed, the neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs), including oral oseltamivir phosphate (Tamiflu®, oseltamivir), inhaled zanamivir hydrate (Relenza®, zanamivir), intravenous peramivir hydrate (Rapiacta®, peramivir), and inhaled long‐acting laninamivir octanoate hydrate (Inavir®, laninamivir), have been mainly used for the treatment of influenza virus infections. These NAIs exert their antiviral function by binding to the enzymatic catalytic sites of influenza surface protein NA.1 In the 2007‐2008, oseltamivir‐resistant seasonal A/H1N1 viruses carrying NA amino acid (AA) mutation H275Y rapidly spread throughout the world.2 We reported a prolonged duration of fever after administrating oseltamivir in patients infected with oseltamivir‐resistant A/H1N1 viruses during the 2008‐2009 season in Japan, which demonstrated the association between clinical effectiveness and the acquisition of resistance to anti‐influenza drugs.3, 4 In the subsequent seasons, oseltamivir‐resistant A/H1N1pdm09 viruses carrying H275Y were reported,5 causing a concern for worldwide spread. A global surveillance system has been developed to detect NAI‐resistant influenza isolates and their related NA AA mutations.6 Currently, Japan is considered as the largest NAIs consuming country.7 Thus, Japan is in an environment where the emergence and selection pressure of NAI‐resistant influenza viruses are always strong compared with other countries and may become an epicenter of their global spread. Therefore, observing the transition of influenza NA AA mutations in Japan is considered important; however, comprehensive surveillance data, which include not only detecting NAI resistance and its related AA mutations but also determining NA AAs in epidemic viruses season by season, have not been fully reported in Japan. We have developed a network of physicians throughout Japan who routinely collect influenza virus samples, along with patient information.3, 4 In this study, we sequenced the full length of NA genes of epidemic influenza viruses isolated in Japan during the seasons from 2011‐2012 to 2016‐2017 to detect their AA mutations and examine its relationship with NAI resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection

As a part of a post‐marketing surveillance of laninamivir based on the rules of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan, a series of surveillance studies have been conducted to examine the susceptibility (50% inhibitory concentration, IC50) of NAIs8, 9, 10, 11, 12; a total of 1791 samples, including 396 A/H1N1pdm09, 1117 A/H3N2, and 278 B isolates, were collected to determine their IC50 values during the seasons from 2011‐2012 to 2016‐2017 in Japan. As an additional part of our surveillance, a total of 380 samples, including 49 A/H1N1pdm09, 251 A/H3N2, and 80 B isolates, were analyzed to obtain NA sequencing data. Nasopharyngeal swabs for influenza virus isolation were collected, and the background history of patients who had a positive result on a rapid influenza antigen test, conducted in one of the member clinics of our nation‐wide study network of general practitioners, was determined. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. All study participants were outpatients, and this study did not include any patients with severe chronic respiratory diseases, renal diseases, liver diseases, or heart failure.

Influenza virus isolation and typing

Nasal aspirates, nasopharyngeal swabs, or self‐blown nasal discharge obtained from patients were soaked in virus transport medium and 75 μL of the medium was cultured using Madin‐Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. Monolayer‐cultured MDCK cells were inoculated with viruses collected from the clinical samples, and the cells were incubated at 34°C and 5% CO2. The wells were monitored daily until 7 days for virus growth by cytopathic effects, and the supernatant of the wells that exhibited sufficient cytopathic effects was collected. Viral RNA was extracted from infected MDCK cell culture supernatants using the Maxwell 16 LEV simply RNA Cells Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and B subtypes were determined using type‐ and subtype‐specific primers.13

Measurement of virus susceptibility to NAIs

As a marker of virus susceptibility to NAIs, the IC50 values of oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, and laninamivir were determined for each influenza isolate by a fluorescence‐based neuraminidase inhibition assay.14, 15 Reduced NAI susceptibility was defined according to the criteria provided by the World Health Organization.16 The IC50 value for each virus was compared with the median IC50 for the same subtype viruses isolated in the same season to calculate a fold increase. For A viruses, reduced inhibition (RI) was defined as a 10‐fold to 100‐fold increase in IC50 values, while highly reduced inhibition (HRI) was defined as more than 100‐fold increase in IC50 values. For B viruses, the corresponding fold increases of RI and HRI were 5‐50 and >50, respectively. Viruses exhibiting RI or HRI were considered as NAI resistant.

Sequencing

RT‐PCR was performed using the A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and B RNA samples.17, 18 After amplicon preparation, deep sequencing was conducted using the Illumina MiSeq sequencing system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).19 Data processing was then performed using the pipeline prepared by Amelieff Co. (Tokyo, Japan). Finally, genome sequences were constructed using the reference sequences and filtered variants. The NA AA sequence was deduced from the obtained nucleotide sequence. In this study, a dominantly occupied nucleotide at each base position was determined as a consensus in the data processing. The NA AA lengths of A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and B viruses were 469, 469, and 466 AAs, respectively. The NA catalytic sites consisted of a total of 19 AAs, including AAs 118, 119, 151, 152, 156, 178, 179, 198, 222, 224, 227, 274, 276, 277, 292, 294, 371, 406, and 425 in N2 numbering. AA differences from consensus, which meant an AA type occupied by more than half isolates in the specific season, were defined as mutations. All AA mutations in NA and IC50 values in the corresponding isolates are shown in Tables S1–S13.

Nucleotide sequence accession number

The sequence data from this study were deposited into the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank nucleotide sequence databases under the following accession numbers: LC406948‐LC407103, LC408965‐LC409058, and LC409129‐LC409257.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi‐square test. P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the jmp pro software, version 11 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

RESULTS

The detection rates of circulating influenza A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and B viruses with reduced susceptibility (RI or HRI, RI/HRI) to NAIs during the seasons from 2011‐2012 to 2016‐2017 in Japan are shown in Table 1. A/H1N1pdm09 viruses displaying RI/HRI were detected at a frequency of 1.2% (2/172 isolates) and 1.4% (3/210 isolates) in the 2013‐2014 and 2015‐2016 epidemic seasons, respectively. Precisely, two viruses isolated in the 2013‐2014 season exhibited HRI by oseltamivir and RI by peramivir. Two of the three viruses isolated in the 2015‐2016 season displayed HRI by oseltamivir and RI by peramivir, and the remaining one showed RI only by oseltamivir. No A/H1N1pdm09 viruses exhibiting RI/HRI by zanamivir or laninamivir were detected during the seasons examined. For A/H3N2 and B, no virus with RI/HRI for any of the four NAIs was detected during the seasons from 2011‐2012 to 2016‐2017.
Table 1

Detection of reduced susceptibility by neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) in the circulating influenza viruses during the Japanese seasons from 2011‐2012 to 2016‐2017

SeasonA/H1N1pdm09A/H3N2B
No. of samplesRI or HRIDetection rate (%)No. of samplesRI or HRIDetection rate (%)No. of samplesRI or HRIDetection rate (%)
2011‐20120NANA28300.04200.0
2012‐2013500.031600.0800.0
2013‐201417221.24900.010600.0
2014‐20150NANA20000.01900.0
2015‐201621031.42000.08200.0
2016‐2017900.024900.02100.0
Total3965*1.3111700.027800.0

HRI, highly reduced inhibition; NA, not available; RI, reduced inhibition.

RI or HRI was defined based on the criteria by the World Health Organization (Ref. 16).

*All the five A/H1N1pdm09 viruses displaying RI or HRI exhibited reduced inhibition by oseltamivir. Four of the five A/H1N1pdm09 viruses displaying RI or HRI exhibited reduced inhibition by peramivir.

Detection of reduced susceptibility by neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) in the circulating influenza viruses during the Japanese seasons from 2011‐2012 to 2016‐2017 HRI, highly reduced inhibition; NA, not available; RI, reduced inhibition. RI or HRI was defined based on the criteria by the World Health Organization (Ref. 16). *All the five A/H1N1pdm09 viruses displaying RI or HRI exhibited reduced inhibition by oseltamivir. Four of the five A/H1N1pdm09 viruses displaying RI or HRI exhibited reduced inhibition by peramivir. NA AA mutation rates were compared between catalytic and non‐catalytic sites of each virus (Table 2). Only five AA mutations were detected in the catalytic sites of A/H1N1pdm09 viruses, although their AA mutation rates at catalytic sites were not significantly different from those at non‐catalytic sites (0.54% vs 0.45%). For A/H3N2, only 13 AA mutations were detected in the catalytic sites. In the entire seasons examined, the AA mutation rates of A/H3N2 viruses were significantly lower at catalytic sites than at non‐catalytic sites (0.27% vs 0.65%, P = 0.001). No AA mutations were detected in the catalytic sites of B viruses, resulting in a significant lower frequency at the catalytic sites compared with those at the non‐catalytic sites (0.0% vs 0.70%, P = 0.001). In the entire season examined, the AA mutations per sample at the catalytic sites of A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and B were 0.10, 0.05, and 0.00 AAs, respectively, which confirmed the extremely low number in the AA mutations at the NA catalytic sites (Table S14).
Table 2

Comparison of amino acid mutation rates between catalytic and non‐catalytic sites of neuraminidase genes

VirusSeasonNo. of samplesAll sitesCatalytic sitesNon‐catalytic sites
No. of total AA mutationsNo. of total AAsMutation rate (%)No. of total AA mutationsNo. of total AAsMutation rate (%)No. of total AA mutationsNo. of total AAsMutation rate (%) P value
A/H1N1pdm092013‐2014204993800.5223800.534790000.520.991
2015‐2016204293800.4533800.793990000.430.308
2016‐201791442210.3301710.001440500.350.441
Total4910522 9810.4659310.5410022 0500.450.711
A/H3N22011‐20124812022 5120.5339120.3311721 6000.540.387
2012‐2013489722 5120.4349120.449321 6000.430.971
2013‐2014207793800.8213800.267690000.840.219
2014‐20154016518 7600.8807600.0016518 0000.920.008
2015‐2016195889110.6513610.285785500.670.367
2016‐20177622635 6440.63414440.2822234 2000.650.081
Total251743117 7190.631347690.27730112 9500.650.001
B2013‐2014208293200.8803800.008289400.920.061
2014‐2015194188540.4603610.004184930.480.186
2015‐2016202993200.3103800.002989400.320.266
2016‐2017219897861.0003990.009893871.040.040
Total8025037 2800.67015200.0025035 7600.700.001

AA, amino acid.

The neuraminidase AA lengths of A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and B viruses were 469, 469, and 466 AAs, respectively. The neuraminidase catalytic sites consisted of a total of 19 AAs.

Comparison of amino acid mutation rates between catalytic and non‐catalytic sites of neuraminidase genes AA, amino acid. The neuraminidase AA lengths of A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and B viruses were 469, 469, and 466 AAs, respectively. The neuraminidase catalytic sites consisted of a total of 19 AAs. Based on the reports on NA AA mutations associated with reduced inhibition by NAIs,2, 6, 20 RI/HRI‐related AA mutations were extracted from NA sequencing data examined in this study (Table 3). Most (10/13 mutations) of the AA mutations detected in the catalytic sites of A/H3N2 viruses were D151G/N mutations, which were found to be induced by an MDCK cultivation.21, 22 T148I in the non‐catalytic sites was also reported to be associated with an MDCK passage.23 These AA mutations were not detected in any of unpassaged clinical samples.22 Finally, few AA mutations (3/4769, 0.06%, referred to Table 2) in the catalytic sites of A/H3N2 viruses occurred without their D151G/N mutations. With regard to the substantial RI/HRI‐related AA mutations detected in this study, four A/H1N1pdm09 viruses displaying HRI by oseltamivir and RI by peramivir contained H275Y mutations. The isolate exhibiting RI by oseltamivir in the 2015‐2016 season did not carry any of the RI‐related AA mutations (DS6‐349 in Table S8). D199N in A/H1N1pdm09, D151E, K249E, G320E, and S331R in A/H3N2, and I262T in B were extracted as RI/HRI‐related AA mutations, based on their related references6, 24, 25, 26; however, no virus harboring these AA mutations showed substantial RI/HRI based on their IC50 values.
Table 3

Extraction of NA amino acid mutations associated with reduced susceptibility by NAIs

VirusSeasonSampleAA mutationCatalytic siteIC50 (nmol/L)
OseltamivirPeramivirZanamivirLaninamivirReference
Culture‐induced mutation
A/H3N22011‐2012DS2‐35T148I0.50.61.42.0 23
DS2‐44T148I0.50.61.31.9
DS2‐113T148I0.91.02.23.8
DS2‐209T148I0.50.61.71.8
DS2‐393T148I0.80.82.13.4
DS2‐516T148I0.50.82.31.8
DS2‐94T148I0.30.31.01.2
DS2‐415D151GCatalytic site0.80.81.92.9 22
DS2‐94D151NCatalytic site0.30.31.01.2 22
2012‐2013DS3‐34T148I0.40.81.02.9
DS3‐229T148I0.80.61.72.8
DS3‐94T148I0.91.02.34.0
DS3‐4D151NCatalytic site1.00.82.43.0
DS3‐51D151NCatalytic site0.60.71.13.9
DS3‐122D151NCatalytic site0.80.82.34.4
DS3‐360D151NCatalytic site0.90.72.13.3
2013‐2014DS4‐9T148I0.70.61.92.2
DS4‐354D151NCatalytic site0.80.82.42.4
2014‐2015None
2015‐2016DS6‐47D151GCatalytic site1.00.82.14.5
2016‐2017DS7‐298D151GCatalytic site0.90.61.94.8
DS7‐6D151GCatalytic site0.50.41.61.6
Drug resistance‐related mutation
A/H1N1pdm092013‐2014DS4‐549H275YCatalytic site150.019.01.02.2 5
DS4‐371H275YCatalytic site130.012.00.82.3
2015‐2016DS6‐15D199NCatalytic site1.20.62.52.4 24
DS6‐352H275YCatalytic site150.010.01.33.9
DS6‐528H275YCatalytic site130.017.01.22.7
2016‐2017None
A/H3N22011‐2012None
2012‐2013DS3‐369K249E1.20.92.93.6 6
DS3‐173S331R1.20.72.73.9 26
2013‐2014None
2014‐2015DS5‐388G320E0.90.62.22.8 26
2015‐2016DS6‐11S331R0.80.32.32.9
2016‐2017DS7‐129D151ECatalytic site1.10.82.34.8 25
B2013‐2014None
2014‐2015None
2015‐2016None
2016‐2017DS7‐219I262T142.17.116 6

AA, amino acid; HRI, highly reduced inhibition; IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration; NA, neuraminidase; NAIs, neuraminidase inhibitors; RI, reduced inhibition.

RI/HRI‐related AA mutations were extracted from NA sequencing data examined in this study, based on the previous reports.

The AA position numberings of A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and B viruses are based on N1, N2, and B type‐specific numbering, respectively.

Median IC50 values and fold changes are shown in Tables S1‐S13.

Extraction of NA amino acid mutations associated with reduced susceptibility by NAIs AA, amino acid; HRI, highly reduced inhibition; IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration; NA, neuraminidase; NAIs, neuraminidase inhibitors; RI, reduced inhibition. RI/HRI‐related AA mutations were extracted from NA sequencing data examined in this study, based on the previous reports. The AA position numberings of A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and B viruses are based on N1, N2, and B type‐specific numbering, respectively. Median IC50 values and fold changes are shown in Tables S1‐S13.

DISCUSSION

In this study, the detection rates of NAI‐resistant influenza viruses and their related NA AA mutations were analyzed from comprehensive NA sequencing data of epidemic isolates in Japan, where NAIs are massively used. Consequently, NA AA mutations associated with NAI resistance were only H275Y of H1N1pdm09. The frequency of H275Y detected in Japan was approximately 1%, which was similar to that reported by a global surveillance.6 For A/H3N2 and B, no virus exhibiting reduced inhibition by NAIs was detected in Japan. These results were also similar to those reported by a global surveillance, which indicated that NAI‐resistant A/H3N2 and B viruses were detected at a lower frequency (<1.0%) compared with NAI‐resistant A/H1N1pdm09 viruses.6 This study showed that few AA mutations in the catalytic sites of A/H3N2 viruses were found without their D151G/N mutations. Our findings suggested that the AA mutations in the NA catalytic sites were far more difficult to occur than those in the non‐catalytic sites, at least for A/H3N2 and B viruses. The acquisition of NAI resistance‐related mutations in epidemic influenza viruses does not seem to occur easily, even in Japan. In this study, the detection rates of AA mutations in the non‐catalytic sites of NA genes were also examined, and relatively many mutations to the catalytic sites were detected. In addition, the AA mutations associated with reduced inhibition by NAIs, which were indicated by the previous reports, were also included in their mutations. However, these presumed NAI resistance‐related mutations did not show any substantial reduced inhibition in this study (Table 3). These findings suggested that the direct contribution of mutations in the NA non‐catalytic sites to NAI resistance was extremely rare. This study showed that oseltamivir‐resistant A/H1N1pdm09 viruses carrying H275Y did not spread throughout Japan. The sporadic community spread of the H275Y‐resistant viruses was reported in Newcastle, Australia, in 2011 and in Sapporo, Japan, in 2013.27, 28 These viruses discovered in the two cities carried additional AA mutations, V241I and N369K, which were presumed to confer a positive effect on viral fitness.29 These viruses were also shown to have carried the third additional AA mutation, N386S/K, which was in contrast suggested to cause a negative effect on viral fitness in the presence of the V241I and N369K mutations.29, 30 In our data (Table S15), both N386 and K386 in addition to I241 and K369 were detected in the 2013‐2014 season; in contrast, only K386 together with I241 and K369 was detected in the subsequent seasons. The two oseltamivir‐resistant H275Y viruses isolated in the 2015‐2016 season contained V241I, N369K, and N386K. The dissemination of the H275Y‐resistant viruses may remain restricted, due to impaired viral fitness mechanism that is caused by additional mutations. Our study does not demonstrate whether NA AA mutations determined in the analysis are substantial in the circulating viruses or induced in the process of cultivation, because a direct NA comparison was not conducted between clinical samples and their MDCK‐passaged influenza viruses. However, it is highly possible that T148I and D151G/N are AA mutations induced by an MDCK passage, based on their previous reports,22, 23 although these mutations did not cause a substantial increase in their IC50 values (Table 3). The mechanism of acquiring drug resistance in NA catalytic sites for zanamivir and laninamivir is different from that for oseltamivir and peramivir, due to a difference in their side chain structures.31 Laninamivir is licensed only in Japan and has been used increasingly in the last few years, being the main NAI used. No mutations associated with laninamivir resistance were detected in our study. This finding also suggests that the NA catalytic sites of influenza viruses are well preserved. Even in Japan, the largest consumer of NAIs, no spread of NAI‐resistant viruses with mutations related to clinical ineffectiveness, such as a prolonged duration of fever, has been observed, and the emergence of A/H1N1pdm09 viruses carrying H275Y remains limited. NAIs are currently effective for the treatment of influenza virus infections, although a continued surveillance is warranted in the future.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

This investigation was partially supported by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. H. Ikematsu has previously received honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, for medical advice. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  30 in total

1.  Importance of neuraminidase active-site residues to the neuraminidase inhibitor resistance of influenza viruses.

Authors:  Hui-Ling Yen; Erich Hoffmann; Garry Taylor; Christoph Scholtissek; Arnold S Monto; Robert G Webster; Elena A Govorkova
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Emergence of oseltamivir-resistant pandemic H1N1 virus during prophylaxis.

Authors:  Mariana Baz; Yacine Abed; Jesse Papenburg; Xavier Bouhy; Marie-Eve Hamelin; Guy Boivin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  In vitro neuraminidase inhibitory activity of four neuraminidase inhibitors against influenza virus isolates in the 2011-2012 season in Japan.

Authors:  Hideyuki Ikematsu; Naoki Kawai; Norio Iwaki; Seizaburo Kashiwagi
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.211

4.  Characterization of a large cluster of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses cross-resistant to oseltamivir and peramivir during the 2013-2014 influenza season in Japan.

Authors:  Emi Takashita; Maki Kiso; Seiichiro Fujisaki; Masaru Yokoyama; Kazuya Nakamura; Masayuki Shirakura; Hironori Sato; Takato Odagiri; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Masato Tashiro
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Universal influenza B virus genomic amplification facilitates sequencing, diagnostics, and reverse genetics.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Xudong Lin; Wei Wang; Rebecca A Halpin; Jayati Bera; Timothy B Stockwell; Ian G Barr; David E Wentworth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Effect of seasonal vaccination on the selection of influenza A/H3N2 epidemic variants.

Authors:  Yong Chong; Hideyuki Ikematsu
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Single-reaction genomic amplification accelerates sequencing and vaccine production for classical and Swine origin human influenza a viruses.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Matthew E Donnelly; Derek T Scholes; Kirsten St George; Masato Hatta; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; David E Wentworth
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Cell culture-selected substitutions in influenza A(H3N2) neuraminidase affect drug susceptibility assessment.

Authors:  Daisuke Tamura; Ha T Nguyen; Katrina Sleeman; Marnie Levine; Vasiliy P Mishin; Hua Yang; Zhu Guo; Margaret Okomo-Adhiambo; Xiyan Xu; James Stevens; Larisa V Gubareva
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparison of mutation patterns in full-genome A/H3N2 influenza sequences obtained directly from clinical samples and the same samples after a single MDCK passage.

Authors:  Hong Kai Lee; Julian Wei-Tze Tang; Debra Han-Lin Kong; Tze Ping Loh; Donald Kok-Leong Chiang; Tommy Tsan-Yuk Lam; Evelyn Siew-Chuan Koay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Global update on the susceptibility of human influenza viruses to neuraminidase inhibitors, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Emi Takashita; Adam Meijer; Angie Lackenby; Larisa Gubareva; Helena Rebelo-de-Andrade; Terry Besselaar; Alicia Fry; Vicky Gregory; Sook-Kwan Leang; Weijuan Huang; Janice Lo; Dmitriy Pereyaslov; Marilda M Siqueira; Dayan Wang; Gannon C Mak; Wenqing Zhang; Rod S Daniels; Aeron C Hurt; Masato Tashiro
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 10.103

View more
  2 in total

1.  Consecutive influenza surveillance of neuraminidase mutations and neuraminidase inhibitor resistance in Japan.

Authors:  Yong Chong; Shinya Matsumoto; Dongchon Kang; Hideyuki Ikematsu
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Laninamivir-Interferon Lambda 1 Combination Treatment Promotes Resistance by Influenza A Virus More Rapidly than Laninamivir Alone.

Authors:  Simone E Adams; Vladimir Y Lugovtsev; Anastasia Kan; Nicolai V Bovin; Raymond P Donnelly; Natalia A Ilyushina
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.