BACKGROUND: The Surprise Question: 'would you be surprised if this patient were to die within the next year?' has been shown to predict mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease and cancer. This prospective study aimed to determine whether the Surprise Question could identify heart failure patients with a prognosis of less than 1 year, and whether the Surprise Question can be used by different healthcare professionals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 129 consecutive patients admitted with decompensated heart failure were included. Doctors and nurses were asked to provide a 'surprised' or 'not surprised' response to the Surprise Question for each patient. Patients were followed up until death or 1 year following study inclusion. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the Surprise Question were assessed. Cox regression was used to determine covariates significantly associated with survival. The Surprise Question showed excellent sensitivity (0.85) and negative predictive value (0.88) but only fair specificity (0.59) and positive predictive value (0.52) when asked of cardiologists. There were similar levels of accuracy between doctors and specialist nurses. The Surprise Question was significantly associated with all-cause mortality in multivariate regression analysis (hazard ratio 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.0-7.9, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the Surprise Question can identify heart failure patients within the last year of life. Despite over-classification of patients into the 'not surprised' category, the Surprise Question identified nearly all patients who were within the last year of life, whilst also accurately identifying those unlikely to die.
BACKGROUND: The Surprise Question: 'would you be surprised if this patient were to die within the next year?' has been shown to predict mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease and cancer. This prospective study aimed to determine whether the Surprise Question could identify heart failurepatients with a prognosis of less than 1 year, and whether the Surprise Question can be used by different healthcare professionals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 129 consecutive patients admitted with decompensated heart failure were included. Doctors and nurses were asked to provide a 'surprised' or 'not surprised' response to the Surprise Question for each patient. Patients were followed up until death or 1 year following study inclusion. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the Surprise Question were assessed. Cox regression was used to determine covariates significantly associated with survival. The Surprise Question showed excellent sensitivity (0.85) and negative predictive value (0.88) but only fair specificity (0.59) and positive predictive value (0.52) when asked of cardiologists. There were similar levels of accuracy between doctors and specialist nurses. The Surprise Question was significantly associated with all-cause mortality in multivariate regression analysis (hazard ratio 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.0-7.9, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the Surprise Question can identify heart failurepatients within the last year of life. Despite over-classification of patients into the 'not surprised' category, the Surprise Question identified nearly all patients who were within the last year of life, whilst also accurately identifying those unlikely to die.
Authors: Yuchieh Kathryn Chang; Holland Kaplan; Yimin Geng; Li Mo; Jennifer Philip; Anna Collins; Larry A Allen; John A McClung; Martin A Denvir; David Hui Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Faraz Alizadeh; Emily Morell; Kevin Hummel; Yunhong Wu; David Wypij; Danes Matthew; Paul Esteso; Katie Moynihan; Elizabeth D Blume Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 1.838
Authors: Laura P Gelfman; Harriet Mather; Karen McKendrick; Angela Y Wong; Mathew D Hutchinson; Rachel J Lampert; Hannah I Lipman; Daniel D Matlock; Keith M Swetz; Sean P Pinney; R Sean Morrison; Nathan E Goldstein Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 6.592
Authors: Dana Tripp; Jaclyn Janis; Benjamin Jarrett; F Lee Lucas; Tania D Strout; Paul K J Han; Isabella Stumpf; Rebecca N Hutchinson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Gwen M Bernacki; Cara L McDermott; Daniel D Matlock; Ann M O'Hare; Lyndia Brumback; Nisha Bansal; James N Kirkpatrick; Ruth A Engelberg; Jared Randall Curtis Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Catharina C Moor; Nelleke C Tak van Jaarsveld; Catherine Owusuaa; Jelle R Miedema; Sara Baart; Carin C D van der Rijt; Marlies S Wijsenbeek Journal: Respiration Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 3.580