Literature DB >> 33409886

How Well Does the Surprise Question Predict 1-year Mortality for Patients Admitted with COPD?

Dana Tripp1, Jaclyn Janis2, Benjamin Jarrett3, F Lee Lucas2, Tania D Strout1,4, Paul K J Han1,2, Isabella Stumpf1,5, Rebecca N Hutchinson6,7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often receive burdensome care at end-of-life (EOL) and infrequently complete advance care planning (ACP). The surprise question (SQ) is a prognostic tool that may facilitate ACP.
OBJECTIVE: To assess how well the SQ predicts mortality and prompts ACP for COPD patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SUBJECTS: Patients admitted to the hospital for an acute exacerbation of COPD between July 2015 and September 2018. MAIN MEASURES: Emergency department (ED) and inpatient clinicians answered, "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 30 days (ED)/one year (inpatient)?" The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of the SQ in predicting 30-day and 1-year mortality. The secondary outcome was the correlation between SQ and ACP (palliative care consultation, documented goals-of-care conversation, change in code status, or completion of ACP document). KEY
RESULTS: The 30-day SQ had a high specificity but low sensitivity for predicting 30-day mortality: sensitivity 12%, specificity 95%, PPV 11%, and NPV 96%. The 1-year SQ demonstrated better accuracy for predicting 1-year mortality: sensitivity 47%, specificity 75%, PPV 35%, and NPV 83%. After multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and prior 6-month admissions, 1-year SQ+ responses were associated with greater odds of 1-year mortality (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.39-4.08) versus SQ-. One-year SQ+ patients were more likely to have a goals-of-care conversation (25% vs. 11%, p < 0.01) and complete an advance directive or POLST (46% vs. 23%, p < 0.01). After multivariable adjustment, SQ+ responses to the 1-year SQ were associated with greater odds of ACP receipt (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.64-4.36).
CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year surprise question may be an effective component of prognostication and advance care planning for COPD patients in the inpatient setting.
© 2021. Society of General Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advance care planning; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; goals-of-care; prognostication; surprise question

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33409886      PMCID: PMC8390592          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06512-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  40 in total

1.  Patient-clinician communication about end-of-life care topics: is anyone talking to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Authors:  Lynn F Reinke; Christopher G Slatore; Jane Uman; Edmunds M Udris; Brianna R Moss; Ruth A Engelberg; David H Au
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Illness trajectories and palliative care.

Authors:  Scott A Murray; Marilyn Kendall; Kirsty Boyd; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-30

Review 3.  Do We Know What We Mean? An Examination of the Use of the Phrase "Goals of Care" in the Literature.

Authors:  Kyle P Edmonds; Toluwalase A Ajayi
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  A comparison of symptom prevalence in far advanced cancer, AIDS, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and renal disease.

Authors:  Joao Paulo Solano; Barbara Gomes; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Utility of the "surprise" question to identify dialysis patients with high mortality.

Authors:  Alvin H Moss; Jesse Ganjoo; Sanjay Sharma; Julie Gansor; Sharon Senft; Barbara Weaner; Cheryl Dalton; Karen MacKay; Beth Pellegrino; Priya Anantharaman; Rebecca Schmidt
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030.

Authors:  Colin D Mathers; Dejan Loncar
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 7.  Prognostic variables and scores identifying the end of life in COPD: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura-Jane E Smith; Elizabeth Moore; Ifrah Ali; Liam Smeeth; Patrick Stone; Jennifer K Quint
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2017-07-31

8.  Association of Emergency Clinicians' Assessment of Mortality Risk With Actual 1-Month Mortality Among Older Adults Admitted to the Hospital.

Authors:  Kei Ouchi; Tania Strout; Samir Haydar; Olesya Baker; Wei Wang; Rachelle Bernacki; Rebecca Sudore; Jeremiah D Schuur; Mara A Schonberg; Susan D Block; James A Tulsky
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-09-04

9.  Development and validation of a model to predict the risk of exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Loes C M Bertens; Johannes B Reitsma; Karel G M Moons; Yvonne van Mourik; Jan Willem J Lammers; Berna D L Broekhuizen; Arno W Hoes; Frans H Rutten
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2013-10-10

Review 10.  How accurate is the 'Surprise Question' at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicola White; Nuriye Kupeli; Victoria Vickerstaff; Patrick Stone
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  1 in total

1.  Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Prognostication in Oncology, Dementia, Frailty, and Pulmonary Diseases.

Authors:  Mathias Schlögl; Anand S Iyer; Florian Riese; David Blum; Lanier O'Hare; Tejaswini Kulkarni; Sophie Pautex; Jan Schildmann; Keith M Swetz; Pallavi Kumar; Christopher A Jones
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.947

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.