Literature DB >> 30547881

Prediction error and repetition suppression have distinct effects on neural representations of visual information.

Matthew F Tang1,2, Cooper A Smout1,2, Ehsan Arabzadeh2,3, Jason B Mattingley1,2,4.   

Abstract

Predictive coding theories argue that recent experience establishes expectations in the brain that generate prediction errors when violated. Prediction errors provide a possible explanation for repetition suppression, where evoked neural activity is attenuated across repeated presentations of the same stimulus. The predictive coding account argues repetition suppression arises because repeated stimuli are expected, whereas non-repeated stimuli are unexpected and thus elicit larger neural responses. Here, we employed electroencephalography in humans to test the predictive coding account of repetition suppression by presenting sequences of visual gratings with orientations that were expected either to repeat or change in separate blocks of trials. We applied multivariate forward modelling to determine how orientation selectivity was affected by repetition and prediction. Unexpected stimuli were associated with significantly enhanced orientation selectivity, whereas selectivity was unaffected for repeated stimuli. Our results suggest that repetition suppression and expectation have separable effects on neural representations of visual feature information.
© 2018, Tang et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  efficient coding; electroencephalography; human; multivariate pattern analysis; neuroscience; predictive coding; visual adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30547881      PMCID: PMC6312401          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.33123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  88 in total

1.  Short-term adaptation of auditory receptive fields to dynamic stimuli.

Authors:  Mark N Kvale; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The broad orientation dependence of the motion streak aftereffect reveals interactions between form and motion neurons.

Authors:  Matthew F Tang; J Edwin Dickinson; Troy A W Visser; David R Badcock
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex.

Authors:  John H R Maunsell; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 4.  Decoding Dynamic Brain Patterns from Evoked Responses: A Tutorial on Multivariate Pattern Analysis Applied to Time Series Neuroimaging Data.

Authors:  Tijl Grootswagers; Susan G Wardle; Thomas A Carlson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Early adaptation to repeated unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes in the right hemisphere: evidence from the N170 ERP component.

Authors:  Stéphanie Caharel; Olivier d'Arripe; Meike Ramon; Corentin Jacques; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Decoding and reconstructing color from responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Gijs Joost Brouwer; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Distinct effects of brief and prolonged adaptation on orientation tuning in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Carlyn A Patterson; Stephanie C Wissig; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Distinct cortical codes and temporal dynamics for conscious and unconscious percepts.

Authors:  Moti Salti; Simo Monto; Lucie Charles; Jean-Remi King; Lauri Parkkonen; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Stable and Dynamic Coding for Working Memory in Primate Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Eelke Spaak; Kei Watanabe; Shintaro Funahashi; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Dynamic range adaptation in primary motor cortical populations.

Authors:  Robert G Rasmussen; Andrew Schwartz; Steven M Chase
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  10 in total

1.  Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Prediction error and repetition suppression have distinct effects on neural representations of visual information.

Authors:  Matthew F Tang; Cooper A Smout; Ehsan Arabzadeh; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 3.  Efficient Temporal Coding in the Early Visual System: Existing Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Byron H Price; Jeffrey P Gavornik
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.387

Review 4.  Neural mechanism of priming in visual search.

Authors:  Jacob A Westerberg; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Diverse Temporal Dynamics of Repetition Suppression Revealed by Intracranial Recordings in the Human Ventral Temporal Cortex.

Authors:  Vinitha Rangarajan; Corentin Jacques; Robert T Knight; Kevin S Weiner; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Implicit Neurofeedback Training of Feature-Based Attention Promotes Biased Sensory Processing during Integrative Decision-Making.

Authors:  Angela I Renton; David R Painter; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Brain signatures of a multiscale process of sequence learning in humans.

Authors:  Maxime Maheu; Stanislas Dehaene; Florent Meyniel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Attention promotes the neural encoding of prediction errors.

Authors:  Cooper A Smout; Matthew F Tang; Marta I Garrido; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Intention-based and sensory-based predictions.

Authors:  Álvaro Darriba; Yi-Fang Hsu; Sandrien Van Ommen; Florian Waszak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception.

Authors:  Kevin S Walsh; David P McGovern; Andy Clark; Redmond G O'Connell
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 5.691

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.