M Bartikian1, A Ferreira2, A Gonçalves-Ferreira2,3, L L Neto2,4. 1. Anatomy Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Instituto de Anatomia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028, Lisbon, Portugal. mickael.bartikian@gmail.com. 2. Anatomy Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Instituto de Anatomia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028, Lisbon, Portugal. 3. Neurosurgery Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal. 4. Neuroradiology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In many medical schools, the study of Anatomy is becoming increasingly theoretical owing to the difficulty of having human body parts available, rather than offering the students the possibility of a more realistic and practical approach. We developed a project where we use a 3D printer to produce models of the human skull bones, with high quality and quantity to satisfy the needs for Anatomy classes and to be available for request to study at home. METHODS: We selected regular and well-shaped bones of the head upon which we based the 3D models. These bones were scanned using a 64-channel Computed Tomography (high-resolution volumetric acquisition) and the resulting images were then processed with a segmentation software to isolate and reconstruct the structures of interest. The final digital three-dimensional objects were converted into a printable file that the 3D printer could read. We used two filament extrusion type 3D printers, the Prusa i3 and the Zortrax M200. RESULTS: We have printed successfully several models of the skull bones, such as the temporal, occipital, and sphenoid. All the models have obtained good anatomical detail, thus demonstrating the practicality of this technology. Key aspects of the CT image post-processing are discussed. The production process is cost-effective and technically accessible. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the potential of 3D printing to create more complex models (e.g. regional, vascular, nervous system structures) that would allow a similar experience compared with a dissection.
PURPOSE: In many medical schools, the study of Anatomy is becoming increasingly theoretical owing to the difficulty of having human body parts available, rather than offering the students the possibility of a more realistic and practical approach. We developed a project where we use a 3D printer to produce models of the human skull bones, with high quality and quantity to satisfy the needs for Anatomy classes and to be available for request to study at home. METHODS: We selected regular and well-shaped bones of the head upon which we based the 3D models. These bones were scanned using a 64-channel Computed Tomography (high-resolution volumetric acquisition) and the resulting images were then processed with a segmentation software to isolate and reconstruct the structures of interest. The final digital three-dimensional objects were converted into a printable file that the 3D printer could read. We used two filament extrusion type 3D printers, the Prusa i3 and the Zortrax M200. RESULTS: We have printed successfully several models of the skull bones, such as the temporal, occipital, and sphenoid. All the models have obtained good anatomical detail, thus demonstrating the practicality of this technology. Key aspects of the CT image post-processing are discussed. The production process is cost-effective and technically accessible. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the potential of 3D printing to create more complex models (e.g. regional, vascular, nervous system structures) that would allow a similar experience compared with a dissection.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D printing; Anatomy; Bones; Occipital; Segmentation; Skull; Sphenoid; Temporal
Authors: Gerald F Greil; Axel Kuettner; Thomas Flohr; Michael Grasruck; Ludger Sieverding; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Ivo Wolf Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Horst-Werner Korf; Helmut Wicht; Robert L Snipes; Jean-Pierre Timmermans; Friedrich Paulsen; Gabriele Rune; Eveline Baumgart-Vogt Journal: Ann Anat Date: 2008-01-18 Impact factor: 2.698
Authors: Andreas A Giannopoulos; Leonid Chepelev; Adnan Sheikh; Aili Wang; Wilfred Dang; Ekin Akyuz; Chris Hong; Nicole Wake; Todd Pietila; Philip B Dydynski; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Frank J Rybicki Journal: 3D Print Med Date: 2015-11-27
Authors: Kacper Kroczek; Paweł Turek; Damian Mazur; Jacek Szczygielski; Damian Filip; Robert Brodowski; Krzysztof Balawender; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Bogumił Lewandowski; Stanisław Orkisz; Artur Mazur; Grzegorz Budzik; Józef Cebulski; Mariusz Oleksy Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2022-04-09 Impact factor: 4.967
Authors: Bita Shahrvini; Sally L Baxter; Charles S Coffey; Bridget V MacDonald; Lina Lander Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 2.463