Literature DB >> 30546941

Systemic autophagy in the therapeutic response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Francesca Castoldi1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Erika Vacchelli1,2,3,4,5,6, Laurence Zitvogel7,9,10, Maria Chiara Maiuri1,2,3,4,5,6, Federico Pietrocola2,11, Guido Kroemer1,2,3,4,5,6,12,13.   

Abstract

The success of chemotherapy largely depends on the anticancer immune response triggered by tumor cells that succumb to immunogenic cell death (ICD). One of the hallmarks of ICD is premortem autophagy that facilitates the release of adenosine triphosphate from dying cancer cells and acts as a chemoattractant for dendritic cell precursors. Here, we show that the immune response induced by inoculation of cancer cells undergoing ICD in response to the anthracycline mitoxantrone (MTX) can be improved by a short-term fasting regimen (48 hours of starvation) and that this effect is reversed by systemic administration of the autophagy inhibitor dimethyl α-ketoglutarate. Tumor growth reduction by MTX treatment is known to depend on autophagy induction in cancer cells as well as on an intact immune system. We compared the antitumor effects of MTX on autophagy-competent cancers implanted in wild type (WT) or partially autophagy-deficient (Becn1 ± or Atg4b -/-) mice. While there was no difference in the tumor growth reducing effects of MTX on tumors evolving in WT, Becn1 +/- and Atg4b -/- mice, we observed an increase in the toxicity of MTX on Atg4b -/- mice. These results suggest that autophagy in cancer cells (but less so in host cells) is rate-limiting for therapeutically relevant anticancer immune responses, yet has a major role in blunting the life-threatening toxicity of chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; fasting; immunogenic cell death; immunotherapy; mitoxantrone

Year:  2018        PMID: 30546941      PMCID: PMC6287785          DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1498285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Introduction

Anticancer chemotherapies are particularly efficient if they succeed in stimulating an anticancer immune response that allows host T lymphocytes to control the growth of residual tumor cells upon discontinuation of the treatment. In mouse models, tumor growth reduction by chemotherapeutic agents often is dependent on T lymphocytes, meaning that tumors evolving in mice that lack T cells do not decrease their progression upon injection of cytotoxicants.[1,2] One efficient way to stimulate such therapeutically relevant antitumor immune responses consists in the induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD). Anthracyclines (such as mitoxantrone, MTX) are able to stimulate ICD, a modality of cell death that is preceded or accompanied by the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which alert innate effectors for the initiation of a cellular immune response.[3-12] One of the most important DAMPs relevant to ICD is adenosine triphosphate (ATP). ATP is normally confined to the intracellular space, yet can be released from stressed and dying cells into the extracellular compartment where it interacts with purinergic receptors, in particular P2Y2 purinergic receptors to attract myeloid cells including dendritic cell (DC) precursors into the tumor bed.[13,14] The release of ATP can be passive (as a result of plasma membrane permeabilization during primary or secondary necrosis) or active via lysosomal secretion.[15] This latter phenomenon is linked to autophagy, which is required for optimal release of ATP from dying cancer cells.[3] For this reason, autophagy-deficient cancer cells fail to release ATP in response to chemotherapy and thus are unable to recruit DCs into the tumor bed and to elicit an anti-tumor immune response.[3,5] Conversely, manipulations that increase autophagy in cancer cells stimulate ATP release, enhance the recruitment of immune cells into the tumor bed and improve anticancer immunosurveillance either in baseline conditions or after chemotherapy with ICD inducers.[16,17] Autophagy induction can be achieved by starvation (i.e. removal of nutrients from cultured cancer cells or from tumor-bearing mice) as well as by the administration of caloric restriction mimetics (CRMs), resulting in an enhanced anticancer immune response.[18-22] Here, we investigated the question as to whether autophagy induction must also occur in the immune system to facilitate tumor growth reduction by ICD-inducing chemotherapy.

Results and discussion

Immunostimulatory effect of fasting

Starvation of mice for 48h causes a ~ 20% weight loss associated with a massive autophagic response in multiple distinct nucleated cell types.[16,23] We tested the effect of fasting on the capacity of mice to mount a protective immune response against cancer cells succumbing to ICD induced by mitoxantrone (MTX) in vitro. For this, C57Bl/6 mice were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) with MTX-treated MCA205 fibrosarcoma cells into the left flank and optionally subjected to starvation (or left on standard chow as a control) for 2 days followed by rechallenge with live MCA205 cells into the opposite flank 7 days later (Figure 1A). Mice that had not been vaccinated (PBS controls) all developed tumors upon injection of live MCA205 cells. In contrast, 44% (8 out of 18) of the mice that were vaccinated with dying MCA205 cells and nourished in an uninterrupted fashion mounted a protective immune response against such cells, meaning that they did not develop tumors. This percentage raised to 77% (14 out of 18) when the mice were subjected to starvation regimen. Importantly, when starvation was combined with injection of dimethyl α-ketoglutarate (DMKG), which inhibits starvation-induced autophagy,[24,25] this percentage dropped to 22% (4 out of 18), indicating a significant immunosuppressive effect of DMKG (Figure 1B). These results confirm that starvation can mediate immunostimulatory effects.[9,19,20] However, they do not resolve the question whether autophagy and its modulation by DMKG impact the cancer cells or the immune system of the host.
Figure 1.

Nutrient deprivation improves tumor vaccination efficacy in an autophagy dependent manner. (A). Schematic outline of the tumor vaccination experiment used in this study. MCA205 fibrosarcoma cells, cultured for 16 hours with mitoxantrone (MTX) to trigger immunogenic cell death, were inoculated into the left flank of 6 weeks-old female C57Bl6/mice. After injection, mice were starved for 48 hours and left untreated or administered (intraperitoneally, i.p.) with the autophagy inhibitor dimethyl-2-oxoglutarate (DMKG). At day 7, mice were rechallenged by injection of live MCA205 cells in the right flank and tumor appearance was monitored over time. (B). Representative analysis of the experiment depicted in (A). Data represent the pool of two different experiments. Statistical significance was calculated by means of the likelihood ratio test. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001.

Nutrient deprivation improves tumor vaccination efficacy in an autophagy dependent manner. (A). Schematic outline of the tumor vaccination experiment used in this study. MCA205 fibrosarcoma cells, cultured for 16 hours with mitoxantrone (MTX) to trigger immunogenic cell death, were inoculated into the left flank of 6 weeks-old female C57Bl6/mice. After injection, mice were starved for 48 hours and left untreated or administered (intraperitoneally, i.p.) with the autophagy inhibitor dimethyl-2-oxoglutarate (DMKG). At day 7, mice were rechallenged by injection of live MCA205 cells in the right flank and tumor appearance was monitored over time. (B). Representative analysis of the experiment depicted in (A). Data represent the pool of two different experiments. Statistical significance was calculated by means of the likelihood ratio test. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001.

Normal anticancer immune responses in hosts with genetically determined autophagy defects

Autophagy-deficient MCA205 fibrosarcomas do not respond to ICD-inducing chemotherapies because they fail to recruit myeloid immune cells into the tumor bed, precluding a subsequent anticancer immune response.[3,19] However, the possible contribution of autophagy in immune effectors has not been studied in this kind of system. We therefore implanted autophagy-competent MCA205 cells into autophagy-competent syngeneic wild type (WT) C57Bl/6 (Figure 2A) or autophagy-deficient hosts such as autophagy related gene 4b (Atg4b−/-) (Figure 2B) or Beclin 1 (Becn1+/-) mice (Figure 2C). The natural tumor growth (without treatment) was not influenced by the autophagy competence of the host. Moreover, a single intraperitoneal injection of MTX, that was administered when the tumor reached a surface of 25 mm[2], was able to reduce tumor growth indistinguishably in WT, Atg4b−/- and Becn1+/- mice (Figure 2A-C). In conclusion, it appears that the autophagy competence of the host does not impact the efficacy of ICD-inducing chemotherapy.
Figure 2.

Systemic autophagy deficiency does not impact on the efficacy of anthracycline-based immunogenic chemotherapy. (A-C) Wild type (WT) autophagy competent C57BL/6 mice (A) or autophagy deficient Atg4b−/- (B) and Becn1+/- (C) mice were inoculated subcutaneously (s.c.) with murine fibrosarcoma MCA205 cells. When tumors reached a size of 25 mm2, mice received a single injection (i.p) of mitoxantrone (MTX) or an equivalent volume of PBS and tumor growth was routinely assessed. From left to right: average (± S.E.M) tumor growth curves of treated with PBS or MTX-based chemotherapy; tumor size distribution at day 26 of data; individual growth curves from mice treated with MTX or PBS. Data represent a pool of three different experiments. Statistical analysis of tumor growth curves was performed by Wald test whereas tumor size distribution at defined time points was analyzed by means of an unpaired t test. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.

Systemic autophagy deficiency does not impact on the efficacy of anthracycline-based immunogenic chemotherapy. (A-C) Wild type (WT) autophagy competent C57BL/6 mice (A) or autophagy deficient Atg4b−/- (B) and Becn1+/- (C) mice were inoculated subcutaneously (s.c.) with murine fibrosarcoma MCA205 cells. When tumors reached a size of 25 mm2, mice received a single injection (i.p) of mitoxantrone (MTX) or an equivalent volume of PBS and tumor growth was routinely assessed. From left to right: average (± S.E.M) tumor growth curves of treated with PBS or MTX-based chemotherapy; tumor size distribution at day 26 of data; individual growth curves from mice treated with MTX or PBS. Data represent a pool of three different experiments. Statistical analysis of tumor growth curves was performed by Wald test whereas tumor size distribution at defined time points was analyzed by means of an unpaired t test. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.

Increased toxicity of mitoxantrone in atg4b−/- mice

A reduction in bodyweight is a proxy of toxicity. MTX-treated mice exhibited a significant decrease in bodyweight. This MTX effect was found for all three mice genotypes analyzed here, namely, WT (Figure 3A), Atg4b−/- (Figure 3B) and Becn1+/- (Figure 3C), when compared to their respective vehicle-only (PBS)-treated controls. However, the body weight reduction appeared stronger for MTX-treated Atg4b−/- mice than for any other treatment group (Figure 3D). These results confirm prior studies showing that the toxic effects of anthracyclines (for instance on the heart) are attenuated by autophagy induction and hence exacerbated in conditions of autophagy inhibition.[26-29] Accordingly, when the cause of death in each experimental group were analyzed, deaths that could not be attributed to cancer cell proliferation (and hence must result from MTX toxicity) were more frequent among MTX-treated Atg4b−/- mice bearing MCA205 tumors than in any other treatment group including MTX-treated WT and Becn1+/- mice (Figure 3E). As a result, MTX was only able to increase the overall survival of MCA205 fibrosarcoma bearing and Becn1+/- but not Atg4b−/- mice (Figure 3F).
Figure 3.

Autophagy deficient mice show increased toxicity in response to anthracyclines based chemotherapy. (A-C) Wild type (WT) autophagy competent C57BL/6 mice (A) or autophagy deficient Atg4b−/- (B) and Becn1+/- (C) mice bearing MCA205 fibrosarcoma tumors received a single injection (i.p.) of mitoxantrone (MTX) or an equivalent volume of PBS, and bodyweight was monitored over time as an indicator of chemotherapy derived toxicity. Average (± S.E.M) (left panel) and individual (right panel) bodyweight curves are shown. Data represent a pool of three different experiments. Statistical analysis of body weight curves was performed by means of linear mixed-effect modeling (over the whole time course). (D) Comparison of MTX effects on body weight between autophagy competent WT and autophagy deficient mice. * p < 0.05 (for MTX WT vs MTX Atg4b−/- comparison); ## p < 0.01 (for MTX Atg4b−/- vs MTX Becn1+/- comparison). (E) Analysis of death type from autophagy competent versus autophagy deficient mice challenged with MTX chemotherapy. ns, non significant; *** p < 0.001 (binomial test). (F) Survival curves of MCA205 tumor bearing WT, Atg4b−/- and Becn1+/- mice. Statistical significance was assessed by means of log rank test. ** p < 0.01.

Autophagy deficient mice show increased toxicity in response to anthracyclines based chemotherapy. (A-C) Wild type (WT) autophagy competent C57BL/6 mice (A) or autophagy deficient Atg4b−/- (B) and Becn1+/- (C) mice bearing MCA205 fibrosarcoma tumors received a single injection (i.p.) of mitoxantrone (MTX) or an equivalent volume of PBS, and bodyweight was monitored over time as an indicator of chemotherapy derived toxicity. Average (± S.E.M) (left panel) and individual (right panel) bodyweight curves are shown. Data represent a pool of three different experiments. Statistical analysis of body weight curves was performed by means of linear mixed-effect modeling (over the whole time course). (D) Comparison of MTX effects on body weight between autophagy competent WT and autophagy deficient mice. * p < 0.05 (for MTX WT vs MTX Atg4b−/- comparison); ## p < 0.01 (for MTX Atg4b−/- vs MTX Becn1+/- comparison). (E) Analysis of death type from autophagy competent versus autophagy deficient mice challenged with MTX chemotherapy. ns, non significant; *** p < 0.001 (binomial test). (F) Survival curves of MCA205 tumor bearing WT, Atg4b−/- and Becn1+/- mice. Statistical significance was assessed by means of log rank test. ** p < 0.01.

Concluding remarks

Major interventions on whole body physiology such as starvation or chemotherapy may impact on the autophagy system that – in teleological terms – aims at increasing the resilience of the organism against metabolic and toxic challenges.[30] In the context of cancer, autophagy induction may have oncopreventive and improve therapeutic outcome after chemotherapy effects.[18,19,31-33] In addition, starvation, which is one of the best-known inducers of autophagy, increases the resistance of mice against the toxic effects of anthracycline-based chemotherapy at the same time that it improves tumor growth reduction.[20,34] This autophagy- or starvation-mediated improvement of chemotherapeutic responses has been attributed to an increase in anticancer immunity.[19,20] Prior studies in which essential autophagy genes were knocked down (as shown for Atg5, Atg7, Atg10, Atg12, Bcln1, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 3 (Pik3c3)) or knocked out (as shown for Atg5) in malignant cells demonstrated that autophagy induction in cancer cells was a requisite for the recognition of such cells by the immune system.[3,19,35] Here, we investigated whether partial effects in autophagy conferred by haploinsufficiency in Becn1 or knockout of Atg4b in the host would compromise the chemotherapy-induced anticancer immune response leading to tumor growth reduction after MTX injection. Apparently such partial autophagy defects do not cause a major immunosuppressive effect, supporting the idea that autophagy in the tumor cells (rather than autophagy in immune effectors) is relevant to the therapeutic outcome of immunogenic chemotherapy.[36,37] As a caveat, we must insist on the fact that the systemic autophagy defects investigated here are only partial. Indeed, knockout of non-redundant autophagy genes (such as Atg5 or Atg7) in the hematopoietic lineage (or more specifically in myeloid or lymphoid subsets) has a strong immunosuppressive effect due to the loss of stem cell functions and an irreversible loss of cellular fitness precluding in-depth analyses of such phenotype with respect to anticancer immunosurveillance.[38] Valter Longo and collaborators have evoked the possibility of using starvation regimens or hypocaloric nutrition to increase the efficacy of chemotherapy while reducing its toxicity.[39,40] Based on the results shown here, we suggest that therapeutic efficacy is linked to autophagy induction in tumor cells, while toxicity reduction is tied to autophagy induction in the host.
  40 in total

Review 1.  Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Aitziber Buqué; Oliver Kepp; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 2.  Pharmacological modulation of autophagy: therapeutic potential and persisting obstacles.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; José Manuel Bravo-San Pedro; Beth Levine; Douglas R Green; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Fasting improves anticancer immunosurveillance via autophagy induction in malignant cells.

Authors:  Federico Pietrocola; Jonathan Pol; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  The Role of Autophagy in the Heart.

Authors:  Sebastiano Sciarretta; Yasuhiro Maejima; Daniela Zablocki; Junichi Sadoshima
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 19.318

5.  The presence of LC3B puncta and HMGB1 expression in malignant cells correlate with the immune infiltrate in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sylvain Ladoire; David Enot; Laura Senovilla; François Ghiringhelli; Vichnou Poirier-Colame; Kariman Chaba; Michaela Semeraro; Marie Chaix; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Laurent Arnould; Marie Laure Poillot; Patrick Arveux; Suzette Delaloge; Fabrice Andre; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 6.  Natural and therapy-induced immunosurveillance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Guido Kroemer; Laura Senovilla; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Fabrice André; Laurence Zitvogel
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 7.  Caloric restriction mimetics: towards a molecular definition.

Authors:  Frank Madeo; Federico Pietrocola; Tobias Eisenberg; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 8.  Autophagy, Inflammation, and Immunity: A Troika Governing Cancer and Its Treatment.

Authors:  Zhenyu Zhong; Elsa Sanchez-Lopez; Michael Karin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Screening of novel immunogenic cell death inducers within the NCI Mechanistic Diversity Set.

Authors:  Abdul Qader Sukkurwala; Sandy Adjemian; Laura Senovilla; Mickaël Michaud; Sabrina Spaggiari; Erika Vacchelli; Elisa Elena Baracco; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Laurence Zitvogel; Oliver Kepp; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 8.110

10.  TumGrowth: An open-access web tool for the statistical analysis of tumor growth curves.

Authors:  David P Enot; Erika Vacchelli; Nicolas Jacquelot; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 8.110

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Trial watch: dendritic cell vaccination for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jenny Sprooten; Jolien Ceusters; An Coosemans; Patrizia Agostinis; Steven De Vleeschouwer; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Abhishek D Garg
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 2.  Autophagy in major human diseases.

Authors:  Daniel J Klionsky; Giulia Petroni; Ravi K Amaravadi; Eric H Baehrecke; Andrea Ballabio; Patricia Boya; José Manuel Bravo-San Pedro; Ken Cadwell; Francesco Cecconi; Augustine M K Choi; Mary E Choi; Charleen T Chu; Patrice Codogno; Maria Isabel Colombo; Ana Maria Cuervo; Vojo Deretic; Ivan Dikic; Zvulun Elazar; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Gian Maria Fimia; David A Gewirtz; Douglas R Green; Malene Hansen; Marja Jäättelä; Terje Johansen; Gábor Juhász; Vassiliki Karantza; Claudine Kraft; Guido Kroemer; Nicholas T Ktistakis; Sharad Kumar; Carlos Lopez-Otin; Kay F Macleod; Frank Madeo; Jennifer Martinez; Alicia Meléndez; Noboru Mizushima; Christian Münz; Josef M Penninger; Rushika M Perera; Mauro Piacentini; Fulvio Reggiori; David C Rubinsztein; Kevin M Ryan; Junichi Sadoshima; Laura Santambrogio; Luca Scorrano; Hans-Uwe Simon; Anna Katharina Simon; Anne Simonsen; Alexandra Stolz; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Sharon A Tooze; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Junying Yuan; Zhenyu Yue; Qing Zhong; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Federico Pietrocola
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 14.012

3.  α-Ketoglutarate inhibits autophagy.

Authors:  Elisa Elena Baracco; Francesca Castoldi; Sylvère Durand; David P Enot; Jelena Tadic; Katharina Kainz; Frank Madeo; Alexis Chery; Valentina Izzo; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Federico Pietrocola; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.955

4.  A synergistic triad of chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and caloric restriction mimetics eradicates tumors in mice.

Authors:  Sarah Lévesque; Julie Le Naour; Federico Pietrocola; Juliette Paillet; Margerie Kremer; Francesca Castoldi; Elisa E Baracco; Yan Wang; Erika Vacchelli; Gautier Stoll; Ariane Jolly; Pierre De La Grange; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Jonathan G Pol
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 8.110

5.  CD47KO/CRT dual-bioengineered cell membrane-coated nanovaccine combined with anti-PD-L1 antibody for boosting tumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Shengyang Liu; Jiayan Wu; Yuanji Feng; Xiaoya Guo; Tong Li; Meng Meng; Jie Chen; Daquan Chen; Huayu Tian
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-10-04

6.  Reactivation of the tumor suppressor PTEN by mRNA nanoparticles enhances antitumor immunity in preclinical models.

Authors:  Yao-Xin Lin; Yi Wang; Jianxun Ding; Aiping Jiang; Jie Wang; Mian Yu; Sara Blake; Shuaishuai Liu; Charles J Bieberich; Omid C Farokhzad; Lin Mei; Hao Wang; Jinjun Shi
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Secretion by Autophagy Contributes to Melanoma Resistance to Chemotherapy through Tumor Microenvironment Modulation.

Authors:  Hong-Tai Tzeng; Jenq-Lin Yang; Yu-Ju Tseng; Chih-Hung Lee; Wei-Ju Chen; I-Tsu Chyuan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Metabolic Reprogramming by Reduced Calorie Intake or Pharmacological Caloric Restriction Mimetics for Improved Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Erwan Eriau; Juliette Paillet; Guido Kroemer; Jonathan G Pol
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.