Literature DB >> 30546684

Pathological analysis of a case with peri-stent contrast staining after BMS implantation.

Masao Imai1, Atsuo Fukuda2, Nobuhide Miyamoto2, Hidenori Sako2, Takeshi Kimura1, Katsumi Inoue3.   

Abstract

A 68-year-old female underwent bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation in the right coronary artery (RCA) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Recurrent refractory restenosis with peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) formation was observed in the stented lesion at follow-up angiography at 7, 11, and 14 months after the index stent implantation. After 2 repeated interventions, this patient was referred to coronary artery bypass grafting due to occlusion of RCA and progression of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesion at 15 months after stent implantation. Pathologic examination of the surgically resected specimen of stented RCA segment revealed total occlusion with dense fibrous collagenous tissue and significant inflammatory cell infiltration including scattered eosinophils. Extensive loss of medial smooth muscle layer was observed in the vessel wall, which was likely to be the cause of PSS. In the course of treatment, this patient was found to have chromium allergy with positive patch test. Allergic reactions to chromium released from the stent might be one of the triggering mechanisms for in-stent restenosis and PSS after BMS implantation. <Learning objective: Peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) was an abnormal angiographic finding suggesting presence of contrast material outside the stent border after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. However, PSS is rarely seen with bare-metal stents (BMSs), and PSS and refractory restenosis after BMS implantation suggests the relation with metal allergy. We must think of metal allergy after the development of refractory restenosis and PSS with BMS implantation.>.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bare-metal stent; Peri-stent contrast staining; Restenosis

Year:  2016        PMID: 30546684      PMCID: PMC6283703          DOI: 10.1016/j.jccase.2016.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol Cases        ISSN: 1878-5409


  5 in total

1.  Contrast staining outside the sirolimus-eluting stent leading to coronary aneurysm formation: a case of very late stent thrombosis associated with hypersensitivity reaction.

Authors:  Hisashi Kon; Hiroto Sakai; Mitsunori Otsubo; Hideyuki Takano; Kenzo Okamoto; Toshiya Sato; Takeshi Kimura; Katsumi Inoue
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 6.546

2.  Incidence, risk factors, and clinical sequelae of angiographic peri-stent contrast staining after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Masao Imai; Kazushige Kadota; Tsuyoshi Goto; Satoki Fujii; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Yasushi Fuku; Shingo Hosogi; Akitoshi Hirono; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Takeshi Tada; Takeshi Morimoto; Hiroki Shiomi; Ken Kozuma; Katsumi Inoue; Nobuaki Suzuki; Takeshi Kimura; Kazuaki Mitsudo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Nickel and molybdenum contact allergies in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  R Köster; D Vieluf; M Kiehn; M Sommerauer; J Kähler; S Baldus; T Meinertz; C W Hamm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-12-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Diffuse in-stent restenosis of CYPHER® stent due to hypersensitivity reaction confirmed by pathohistological findings.

Authors:  Yoritaka Otsuka; Masanori Nakamura; Nobuaki Kokubu; Akiko Tonooka; Katsumi Inoue; Tetsuya Higami
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Coronary evaginations and peri-scaffold aneurysms following implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds: incidence, outcome, and optical coherence tomography analysis of possible mechanisms.

Authors:  Tommaso Gori; Thomas Jansen; Melissa Weissner; Nicolas Foin; Philip Wenzel; Eberhard Schulz; Stephane Cook; Thomas Münzel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 29.983

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.