Literature DB >> 30546644

The utility of shock coil and left ventricular tip-right ventricular coil impedance as a predictor of pneumothorax in cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation.

Masashi Kamioka1, Minoru Nodera1, Hitoshi Suzuki1, Yasuchika Takeishi1.   

Abstract

A high defibrillation threshold (DFT) infrequently occurs during device implantation. The major cause of high DFT is pneumothorax. However, there are few data about shock coil and left ventricular tip-right ventricular coil (LV tip-RV coil) impedance as a marker of a high DFT caused by pneumothorax. A 65-year-old man, diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy, was referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillator implantation with single shock coil lead. The shock coil impedance was high and LV tip-RV coil impedance was normal just before DFT test. Then, high DFT was detected. Afterwards, pneumothorax was found. After the treatment of the pneumothorax, the shock coil impedance decreased. However, the LV tip-RV coil impedance did not change. This discrepancy can be a useful predictor of the high DFT caused by pneumothorax. With these markers, we can predict high DFT and consequently can treat pneumothorax earlier without the unnecessary shock delivery. <Learning objective: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation is widely performed. Pneumothorax is one of the complications of CRT implantation. High defibrillation threshold (DFT) is known as a predictor of the pneumothorax. However, the predictor of this complication has not fully been evaluated. The high shock coil impedance combined with normal left ventricular tip-right ventricular coil impedance can be a useful predictor of the high DFT caused by pneumothorax.>.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator; Defibrillation threshold testing; Left ventricular tip–right ventricular coil impedance; Pneumothorax; Shock coil impedance

Year:  2016        PMID: 30546644      PMCID: PMC6280731          DOI: 10.1016/j.jccase.2016.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol Cases        ISSN: 1878-5409


  6 in total

Review 1.  Implantation-related complications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Johannes B van Rees; Mihály K de Bie; Joep Thijssen; C Jan Willem Borleffs; Martin J Schalij; Lieselot van Erven
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  The effects of pneumothorax on defibrillation thresholds during pectoral implantation of an active can implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  T J Cohen; D D Lowenkron
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 3.  Ultrasound-guided venous access for pacemakers and defibrillators.

Authors:  Arnold H Seto; Aaron Jolly; Jonathan Salcedo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-11-06

4.  High defibrillation thresholds in transvenous biphasic implantable defibrillators: clinical predictors and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Himanshu H Shukla; Greg C Flaker; Vinod Jayam; David Roberts
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Pneumothorax: an unusual cause of ICD defibrillation failure.

Authors:  D Luria; M S Stanton; M Eldar; M Glikson
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Risk factors influencing complications of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: infection, pneumothorax and heart perforation: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Yu-Sheng Lin; Sheng-Ping Hung; Pei-Rung Chen; Chia-Hung Yang; Hung-Ta Wo; Po-Cheng Chang; Chun-Chieh Wang; Chung-Chuan Chou; Ming-Shien Wen; Chang-Ming Chung; Tien-Hsing Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.