| Literature DB >> 30546033 |
Mingxiao Yang1,2,3, Zheng Yu1, Xiaomin Chen4, Zhenyu Guo4, Shufang Deng1, Lin Chen1, Qiaofeng Wu5, Fanrong Liang6.
Abstract
The effect of active acupoints versus inactive acupoints in treating hypertension is not well documented. Metabolic phenotypes, depicted by metabolomics analysis, reflect the influence of external exposures, nutrition, and lifestyle on the integrated system of the human body. Therefore, we utilized high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to compare the targeted metabolic phenotype changes induced by two different acupoint treatments. The clinical outcomes show that active acupoint treatment significantly lowers 24-hour systolic blood pressure but not diastolic blood pressure, as compared with inactive acupoint treatment. Furthermore, distinctive changes are observed between the metabolomics data of the two groups. Multivariate analysis shows that only in the active acupoint treatment group can the follow-up plasma be clearly separated from the baseline plasma. Moreover, the follow-up plasma of these two groups can be clearly separated, indicating two different post-treatment metabolic phenotypes. Three metabolites, sucrose, cellobiose, and hypoxanthine, are shown to be the most important features of active acupoint treatment. This study demonstrates that metabolomic analysis is a potential tool that can be used to efficiently differentiate the effect of active acupoints from inactive acupoints in treating hypertension. Possible mechanisms are the alternation of hypothalamic microinflammation and the restoration of host-gut microbiota interactions induced by acupuncture.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30546033 PMCID: PMC6292875 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36199-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Graphic summary of the study. This study primarily assessed the blood pressure change after different acupoint treatments. A high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry platform was used to analyse the key plasma metabolites of hypertensive patients. The PCA and PLS-DA models were used to identify the most important features leading to the separation of metabolic phenotypes. This study shows that metabolomics methods are a potential tool to differentiate the effect of active acupoints versus inactive acupoints.
Demographic information and blood pressure indices.
| Group | ATG | ITG |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (Male/Female) | 3/2 | 5/3 | 0.928 |
| Age | 60.80 ± 3.40 | 58.88 ± 3.07 | 0.692 |
| BMI | 26.65 ± 1.73 | 25.17 ± 0.76 | 0.566 |
| WHR | 0.94 ± 0.02 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | 0.178 |
| SBP | 144.0 ± 10.30 | 142.0 ± 8.57 | 0.711 |
| DBP | 87.40 ± 4.10 | 85.88 ± 7.14 | 0.675 |
| DSBP | 146.80 ± 3.88 | 145.50 ± 2.82 | 0.787 |
| DDBP | 88.40 ± 1.21 | 88.00 ± 2.24 | 0.897 |
| NSBP | 135.0 ± 8.59 | 130.60 ± 4.08 | 0.614 |
| NDBP | 80.20 ± 2.11 | 80.25 ± 3.02 | 0.991 |
| Pulse | 73.00 ± 3.54 | 78.67 ± 1.87 | 0.171 |
| Arterial BP | 106.20 ± 1.50 | 104.70 ± 0.76 | 0.360 |
| SBP Variation | 12.02 ± 1.25 | 14.23 ± 0.81 | 0.159 |
| DBP Variation | 13.82 ± 2.01 | 19.87 ± 1.83 | 0.053 |
| SBP Nocturnal Dipping | 8.30 ± 3.78 | 9.55 ± 1.05 | 0.735 |
| DBP Nocturnal Dipping | 10.90 ± 1.98 | 9.26 ± 2.48 | 0.628 |
*ATG: active acupoint group; ITG: inactive acupoint group; BMI: body mass index; WHR: waist-height ratio; SBP/DBP: systolic/diastolic blood pressure; DSBP/DDBP: daytime systolic/diastolic blood pressure; NSBP/NDBP: night time systolic/diastolic blood pressure.
Figure 2Separation of the blood sample between the two groups in the baseline and follow-up using the metabolomic data. (a) This PLS-DA score plot shows that in the baseline, the plasma of the two groups cannot be separated using the target metabolite information; (b) in the follow-up, the plasma of the two groups can clearly be separated using the target metabolite information; (c) in the baseline, the dendrogram cannot be used to visualize the clustering of the two groups using PLS-DA analysis; (d) however, after different treatments, the dendrogram shows obvious clustering of the two groups as analysed by PLS-DA.
Blood pressure changes after six-week acupuncture treatment.
| Group | Parameter | Baseline | Follow-up | MD (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATG | SBP | 144.0 ± 10.30 | 135.80 ± 11.76Δ | 8.20(1.05, 15.35) | 0.034* |
| DBP | 87.40 ± 4.10 | 84.40 ± 3.36 | 3.00(0.22, 5.78) | 0.040* | |
| DSBP | 146.80 ± 3.88 | 143.80 ± 6.14 | 3.00(−6.08, 12.08) | 0.411 | |
| DDBP | 88.40 ± 1.21 | 86.60 ± 4.72 | 1.80(−2.96, 6.56) | 0.353 | |
| NSBP | 135.0 ± 8.59 | 130.50 ± 18.61 | 4.60(−0.854, 10.05) | 0.079 | |
| NDBP | 80.20 ± 2.11 | 76.80 ± 3.11 | 3.40(−5.36, 12.16) | 0.342 | |
| Pulse | 73.00 ± 3.54 | 77.20 ± 6.76 | −4.20(−8.54, 0.14) | 0.055 | |
| Arterial BP | 106.20 ± 1.50 | 103.0 ± 2.45 | 3.20(1.58, 4.82) | 0.005* | |
| SBP Variation | 12.02 ± 1.25 | 14.58 ± 3.12 | −2.56(−8.44, 3.32) | 0.293 | |
| DBP Variation | 13.82 ± 2.01 | 15.83 ± 2.58 | −2.00(−9.29, 5.26) | 0.485 | |
| SBP Nocturnal Dipping | 8.30 ± 3.78 | 6.18 ± 9.95 | 2.11(−7.08, 11.3) | 0.558 | |
| DBP Nocturnal Dipping | 10.90 ± 1.98 | 11.10 ± 6.07 | −0.20(−10.98, 10.58) | 0.961 | |
| ITG | SBP | 142.0 ± 8.57 | 142.30 ± 10.21 | −0.25(−6.92, 6.42) | 0.932 |
| DBP | 85.88 ± 7.14 | 84.63 ± 9.41 | 1.25(−4.24, 6.74) | 0.607 | |
| DSBP | 145.50 ± 2.82 | 144.60 ± 11.16 | 0.88(−6.49, 8.24) | 0.787 | |
| DDBP | 88.00 ± 2.24 | 86.13 ± 9.43 | 1.88(−3.73, 7.48) | 0.455 | |
| NSBP | 130.60 ± 4.08 | 135.30 ± 8.92 | −4.63(−11.10, 1.85) | 0.135 | |
| NDBP | 80.25 ± 3.02 | 79.88 ± 10.84 | 0.38(−7.55, 7.30) | 0.902 | |
| Pulse | 78.67 ± 1.87 | 78.67 ± 4.59 | 6.17(0.84, 11.49) | 0.030* | |
| Arterial BP | 104.70 ± 0.76 | 104.20 ± 7.36 | 0.50(−6.33, 7.33) | 0.858 | |
| SBP Variation | 14.23 ± 0.81 | 14.64 ± 4.03 | −0.40(−4.89, 4.09) | 0.827 | |
| DBP Variation | 19.87 ± 1.83 | 19.66 ± 2.24∆ | 0.21(−6.44, 6.86) | 0.938 | |
| SBP Nocturnal Dipping | 9.55 ± 1.05 | 6.44 ± 4.91 | 3.11(−1.62, 7.84) | 0.152 | |
| DBP Nocturnal Dipping | 9.26 ± 2.48 | 6.54 ± 7.12 | 2.71(−7.17, 12.60) | 0.512 |
* indicates P < 0.05; ∆P < 0.05 which is yielded in the comparison between Group A and Group B after treatment.
Acupuncture-induced changes to key metabolites selected by t-tests and FC analysis.
| Group | Metabolites | Baseline | Follow-up | log2(FC) | −log10(p) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATG | Sucrose | 19.80 ± 6.49 | 1.88 ± 1.24 | −3.5686 | 4.56E-05 | 4.3408 |
| Cellobiose | 429.2 ± 227.6 | 87.28 ± 36.90 | −2.5744 | 0.000964 | 3.0158 | |
| Glycine | 1482 ± 259.1 | 825.6 ± 261.6 | −1.0927 | 0.001052 | 2.9781 | |
| Hypoxanthine | 3.73 ± 1.32 | 25.14 ± 18.92 | 2.5342 | 0.00134 | 2.8728 | |
| Hexanoic acid | 53.83 ± 20.40 | 184.4 ± 65.22 | 1.6189 | 0.004884 | 2.3112 | |
| ketoglutaric acid | 5.04 ± 3.43 | 1.34 ± 0.93 | −2.1528 | 0.009107 | 2.0406 | |
| Threonine | 3.57 ± 1.18 | 8.36 ± 3.92 | 1.0422 | 0.017975 | 1.7453 | |
| Uric acid | 17.61 ± 3.54 | 45.03 ± 26.95 | 1.2089 | 0.083333 | 1.0792 | |
| ITG | ketoglutaric acid | 5.16 ± 1.72 | 21.95 ± 16.44 | 1.8934 | 0.006078 | 2.2162 |
Figure 3Separation of the blood sample between the baseline and follow-up in the two different groups. (a) This PLS-DA score plot shows that in the ATG, the plasma of two time points can be easily and clearly separated using the target metabolite information; (b) in the ITG, the plasma of two time points cannot be separated from each using the target metabolite information; (c) in the ATG, the dendrogram shows the clustering of the two groups using PLS-DA analysis; (d) while in the ITG, the dendrogram does not show significant clustering of the two groups.
Figure 4Potential mechanism of acupuncture improving blood pressure and metabolic function. Acupuncture signals can be transferred from peripheral nerves to the central nervous system. This study indicates that the alternation of hypothalamic microinflammation and the restoration of host-gut microbiota interactions induced by acupuncture could be a possible mechanism for acupuncture to lower blood pressure and restore metabolic abnormality.