Literature DB >> 30545654

Femoral Stem Survivorship in Dorr Type A Femurs After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Tapered Wedge Stem: A Matched Comparative Study With Type B Femurs.

Chan-Woo Park1, Hyeon-Jun Eun1, Sung-Hak Oh1, Hyun-Jun Kim1, Seung-Jae Lim1, Youn-Soo Park1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of understanding on relationship between the femoral geometry and outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated clinical and radiographic outcomes of THA using a cementless tapered wedge stem in patients with Dorr type A proximal femoral morphology and compared with those of type B femurs at a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
METHODS: We analyzed 1089 hips (876 patients) that underwent THA using an identical cementless tapered wedge stem. We divided all femurs into 3 types (Dorr type A, B, and C). Type A and B femurs were statistically matched with age, gender, body mass index, and diagnosis by using propensity score matching. Clinical, radiographic results, and stem survivorship were compared between the matched 2 groups.
RESULTS: A total of 611 femurs (56%) were classified as type A, 427 (39%) as type B, and 51 (5%) as type C. More radiolucent lines around femoral stems were found in type A femurs (7.8%) than in type B femurs (2.5%) (P < .001). Patients with radiolucency showed worse Harris Hip Score (86.2 points) compared with those without radiolucency (93.0 points) (P < .001). The stem survivorship of type A femur (97.8%) was lower than that of type B femur (99.5%) (P = .041). The reasons for femoral revision in type A femurs were periprosthetic fracture (67%), aseptic loosening (22%), and deep infection (11%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a higher rate of complications after THAs using a cementless tapered wedge stem in Dorr type A femurs than those performed in type B femurs.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dorr classification; periprosthetic femoral fracture; stem survivorship; tapered wedge stem; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30545654     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Outcomes with Two Tapered Wedge Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Anterior Approach.

Authors:  Jonathan A Gabor; Vivek Singh; Jorge A Padilla; Ran Schwarzkopf; Roy I Davidovitch
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-17

Review 2.  Progressive proximal loosening of initially well-fixed bilateral Corail stems: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael G Johnston; Kade E Eppich; Celeste Gray; Matthew A Porter; David F Scott
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.925

3.  Classifications in Brief: The Dorr Classification of Femoral Bone.

Authors:  Jacob Wilkerson; Navin D Fernando
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip replacement with a 3-part metaphyseal osseointegrated titanium alloy stem enhanced with low plasticity burnishing: a mean 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Spencer Summers; Evan Nigh; Karim Sabeh; Raymond Robinson
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-08-07

5.  Promising medium-term results of anterior approach with an anatomical short stem in primary hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabrizio Rivera; Alessandro Bardelli; Andrea Giolitti
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-06

6.  Ten-year comparison of two different techniques for femoral bone cavity preparation-broaching versus compaction in patients with cementless total hip arthroplasty : a randomized radiostereometric study of 30 total hip arthroplasties in 15 patients operated bilaterally.

Authors:  Maciej Okowinski; Mette Holm Hjorth; Sebastian Breddam Mosegaard; Jonathan Hugo Jürgens-Lahnstein; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Poul Hedevang Christensen; Søren Kold; Maiken Stilling
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-12

7.  Clinical and radiological results of high offset tri-lock bone preservation stem in unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

Authors:  Linbo Peng; Jun Ma; Yi Zeng; Yuangang Wu; Haibo Si; Bin Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Does the Surgical Approach Influence the Canal Fill of the Proximal Femur for Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Lucas Mattesi; Adrien Cheyrou-Lagrèze; Guillaume-Anthony Odri; Antoine Duhil; Laure Flurin; Mathieu Severyns
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-08-07

9.  A Comparison of Risks and Benefits Regarding Hip Arthroplasty Fixation.

Authors:  Julia Matthias; Mathias P Bostrom; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-11-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.