Michael E Chua1, Jonathan S Mendoza2, Jessica M Ming3, Jun S Dy2, Odina Gomez4. 1. Section of Pediatric Urology, Institute of Urology, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, NCR, Philippines. auhc_ekim@yahoo.com. 2. Section of Pediatric Urology, Institute of Urology, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, NCR, Philippines. 3. Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. 4. Section of Pediatric Imaging, Institute of Radiology, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, NCR, Philippines.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonogram using second-generation contrast with harmonic imaging (CEVUS-HI) in detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) among children. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in March 2018. Relevant comparative studies from Medline, EMBASE, World of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, WHO trial registry and Clinicaltrials.gov were identified and appraised using QUADAS-2. Diagnostic accuracy parameters were determined using VCUG as the reference standard. Adverse effects related to ultrasound contrast were summarized. The heterogeneity and inter-study variability were determined. After appropriate subgroup diagnostic accuracy parameters were investigated, summarizing receiver operator characteristics was constructed using the bivariate model meta-regression to determine the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 12 studies with low-high risk of bias, including 1917 ureteral units from 953 patients were assessed for this meta-analysis. The included studies reported no serious adverse events associated with the ultrasound contrast. The pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters of CEVUS-HI in detecting VUR amongst children were: sensitivity 90.43 (95% CI 90.36-90.50), specificity 92.82 (95% CI 92.76-92.87), the calculated (+) likelihood-ratio 12.59 (95% CI 12.49-12.68), (-) likelihood-ratio of 0.103 (95% CI 0.102-0.104) and extrapolated pooled diagnostic odds-ratio was 122.12 (95% CI 120.75-123.49). Heterogeneity with interstudy variability was noted (p < 0.0001, I-squared > 70%). The AUC was determined to be 0.965 for VUR detection. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters from low-moderate quality of evidence have illustrated that the CEVUS-HI study has an excellent safety profile and acceptable diagnostic accuracy. It may be considered as an alternative diagnostic modality for assessment of VUR among children.
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonogram using second-generation contrast with harmonic imaging (CEVUS-HI) in detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) among children. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in March 2018. Relevant comparative studies from Medline, EMBASE, World of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, WHO trial registry and Clinicaltrials.gov were identified and appraised using QUADAS-2. Diagnostic accuracy parameters were determined using VCUG as the reference standard. Adverse effects related to ultrasound contrast were summarized. The heterogeneity and inter-study variability were determined. After appropriate subgroup diagnostic accuracy parameters were investigated, summarizing receiver operator characteristics was constructed using the bivariate model meta-regression to determine the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 12 studies with low-high risk of bias, including 1917 ureteral units from 953 patients were assessed for this meta-analysis. The included studies reported no serious adverse events associated with the ultrasound contrast. The pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters of CEVUS-HI in detecting VUR amongst children were: sensitivity 90.43 (95% CI 90.36-90.50), specificity 92.82 (95% CI 92.76-92.87), the calculated (+) likelihood-ratio 12.59 (95% CI 12.49-12.68), (-) likelihood-ratio of 0.103 (95% CI 0.102-0.104) and extrapolated pooled diagnostic odds-ratio was 122.12 (95% CI 120.75-123.49). Heterogeneity with interstudy variability was noted (p < 0.0001, I-squared > 70%). The AUC was determined to be 0.965 for VUR detection. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters from low-moderate quality of evidence have illustrated that the CEVUS-HI study has an excellent safety profile and acceptable diagnostic accuracy. It may be considered as an alternative diagnostic modality for assessment of VUR among children.
Authors: Eva Kis; Anna Nyitrai; Ildikó Várkonyi; István Máttyus; Orsolya Cseprekál; György Reusz; Attila Szabó Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2010-08-05 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Penny F Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Marie E Westwood; Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Johannes B Reitsma; Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan A C Sterne; Patrick M M Bossuyt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Javier Zamora; Victor Abraira; Alfonso Muriel; Khalid Khan; Arri Coomarasamy Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2006-07-12 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Magdalena Maria Woźniak; Agata Pawelec; Andrzej Paweł Wieczorek; Maria Małgorzata Zajączkowska; Halina Borzęcka; Paweł Nachulewicz Journal: J Ultrason Date: 2013-12-30
Authors: Constantin A Marschner; Vincent Schwarze; Regina Stredele; Matthias F Froelich; Johannes Rübenthaler; Thomas Geyer; Dirk-André Clevert Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 2.430