Mark Hamer1,2, Adrian Bauman3,4, Joshua A Bell5,6, Emmanuel Stamatakis3,4. 1. School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK. 3. Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 4. Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 5. MRC, Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 6. Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of a negative control is to reproduce a condition that cannot involve the hypothesized causal mechanism, but does involve the same sources of bias and confounding that may distort the primary association of interest. Observational studies suggest physical inactivity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), although potential sources of bias, including reverse causation and residual confounding, make it difficult to infer causality. The aim was to employ a negative control outcome to explore the extent to which the association between physical activity and CVD mortality is explained by confounding. METHODS: The sample comprised 104 851 participants (aged 47 ± 17 years; 45.4% male) followed up over mean (SD) 9.4 ± 4.5 years, recruited from the Health Survey for England and the Scottish Health Survey. RESULTS: There were 10 309 deaths, of which 3109 were attributed to CVD and 157 to accidents (negative control outcome). Accidental death was related to age, male sex, smoking, longstanding illness and psychological distress, with some evidence of social patterning. This confounding structure was similar to that seen with CVD mortality, suggesting that our negative control outcome was appropriate. Physical activity (per SD unit increase in MET-hr-wk) was inversely associated with CVD [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70, 0.80]; the point estimate between physical activity and accidental death was in the same direction but of lesser magnitude (HR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.69, 1.07). A linear dose-response pattern was observed for physical activity and CVD but not with the negative control. CONCLUSIONS: Inverse associations between physical activity and risk of CVD mortality are likely causal but of a smaller magnitude than commonly observed. Negative control studies have the potential to improve causal inference within the physical activity field.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of a negative control is to reproduce a condition that cannot involve the hypothesized causal mechanism, but does involve the same sources of bias and confounding that may distort the primary association of interest. Observational studies suggest physical inactivity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), although potential sources of bias, including reverse causation and residual confounding, make it difficult to infer causality. The aim was to employ a negative control outcome to explore the extent to which the association between physical activity and CVD mortality is explained by confounding. METHODS: The sample comprised 104 851 participants (aged 47 ± 17 years; 45.4% male) followed up over mean (SD) 9.4 ± 4.5 years, recruited from the Health Survey for England and the Scottish Health Survey. RESULTS: There were 10 309 deaths, of which 3109 were attributed to CVD and 157 to accidents (negative control outcome). Accidental death was related to age, male sex, smoking, longstanding illness and psychological distress, with some evidence of social patterning. This confounding structure was similar to that seen with CVD mortality, suggesting that our negative control outcome was appropriate. Physical activity (per SD unit increase in MET-hr-wk) was inversely associated with CVD [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70, 0.80]; the point estimate between physical activity and accidental death was in the same direction but of lesser magnitude (HR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.69, 1.07). A linear dose-response pattern was observed for physical activity and CVD but not with the negative control. CONCLUSIONS: Inverse associations between physical activity and risk of CVD mortality are likely causal but of a smaller magnitude than commonly observed. Negative control studies have the potential to improve causal inference within the physical activity field.
Authors: Barbara E Ainsworth; William L Haskell; Stephen D Herrmann; Nathanael Meckes; David R Bassett; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Jennifer L Greer; Jesse Vezina; Melicia C Whitt-Glover; Arthur S Leon Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Hannah Arem; Steven C Moore; Alpa Patel; Patricia Hartge; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Kala Visvanathan; Peter T Campbell; Michal Freedman; Elisabete Weiderpass; Hans Olov Adami; Martha S Linet; I-Min Lee; Charles E Matthews Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Chi Pang Wen; Jackson Pui Man Wai; Min Kuang Tsai; Yi Chen Yang; Ting Yuan David Cheng; Meng-Chih Lee; Hui Ting Chan; Chwen Keng Tsao; Shan Pou Tsai; Xifeng Wu Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jennifer Mindell; Jane P Biddulph; Vasant Hirani; Emanuel Stamatakis; Rachel Craig; Susan Nunn; Nicola Shelton Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Shaun Scholes; Ngaire Coombs; Zeljko Pedisic; Jennifer S Mindell; Adrian Bauman; Alex V Rowlands; Emmanuel Stamatakis Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2014-05-26 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Steven C Moore; I-Min Lee; Elisabete Weiderpass; Peter T Campbell; Joshua N Sampson; Cari M Kitahara; Sarah K Keadle; Hannah Arem; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Patricia Hartge; Hans-Olov Adami; Cindy K Blair; Kristin B Borch; Eric Boyd; David P Check; Agnès Fournier; Neal D Freedman; Marc Gunter; Mattias Johannson; Kay-Tee Khaw; Martha S Linet; Nicola Orsini; Yikyung Park; Elio Riboli; Kim Robien; Catherine Schairer; Howard Sesso; Michael Spriggs; Roy Van Dusen; Alicja Wolk; Charles E Matthews; Alpa V Patel Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Sebastian E Baumeister; Michael F Leitzmann; Jakob Linseisen; Sabrina Schlesinger Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Po Wen Ku; Emmanuel Stamatakis; Matthew N Ahmadi; I-Min Lee; Mark Hamer; Borja Del Pozo Cruz; Li Jung Chen; Elif Eroglu; Yun-Ju Lai Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 5.551