Literature DB >> 30540916

Can a high-density dental material affect the automatic exposure compensation of digital radiographic images?

Neiandro Santos Galvão1, Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento1, Carlos Augusto Souza Lima1, Deborah Queiroz Freitas1, Francisco Haiter-Neto1, Matheus Lima Oliveira1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: : To investigate the influence of high-density dental material on the automatic exposure compensation of digital radiographic imaging systems.
METHODS: : Two radiographic phantoms were custom made to reproduce radiographic densities of the dental tissues: enamel, dentin and pulp chamber. The phantoms were X-rayed using the Digora Toto, Digora Optime and VistaScan systems for 0.063, 0.1 and 0.16  s. Radiographic acquisitions were repeated in the presence of a high-density material equivalent to a titanium implant, in the small and large sizes. Mean grey values of the dental tissue-equivalent regions were obtained with the Image J software, averaged and compared between the absence and presence of the high-density material using ANOVA for multiple comparisons and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: : The presence of a high-density material significantly (p ≤ 0.05) decreased grey values of the dental tissue-equivalent images in the Digora Toto and VistaScan, regardless of the exposure time. For the Digora Optime, the high-density material decreased the pulp-equivalent grey values at all exposure times, the dentin-equivalent grey values significantly increased at exposure time of the 0.1 and 0.16  s, and the enamel-equivalent grey values significantly increased at the exposure time of 0.16  s (p ≤ 0.05). In general, the size of the high-density material did not affect the grey values significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: : In general, the presence of a high-density dental material in digital radiographic systems influences the AEC by adjusting dental tissue-equivalent grey values.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental; dental materials; digital; radiography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30540916      PMCID: PMC6476359          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20180331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  6 in total

1.  Perceptibility curves for the Digora system.

Authors:  K Yoshiura; U Welander; W D McDavid; G Li; X-Q Shi; T Kawazu; M Tatsumi; T Matsuo; S Kanda
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Technical report. Processing to achieve high-contrast images with computed dental radiography.

Authors:  Y Hayakawa; A G Farman; W C Scarfe; K Kuroyanagi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  New tissue substitutes representing cortical bone and adipose tissue in quantitative radiology.

Authors:  S Sanada; K Kawahara; T Yamamoto; T Takashima
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.

Authors:  K Yoshiura; E Nakayama; M Shimizu; T K Goto; T Chikui; T Kawazu; K Okamura
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Numerical Evaluation of Image Contrast for Thicker and Thinner Objects among Current Intraoral Digital Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Oyunbat Dashpuntsag; Midori Yoshida; Ryosuke Kasai; Naoki Maeda; Hidehiko Hosoki; Eiichi Honda
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Does dose optimisation in digital panoramic radiography affect diagnostic performance?

Authors:  Luciano Augusto Cano Martins; Danieli M Brasil; Laís A Forner; Cassiana Viccari; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Q Freitas; Matheus L Oliveira
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Radiographic diagnosis of proximal caries is not affected by exposure protocols and presence of high-density material on systems with automatic exposure compensation.

Authors:  Iris Rafaela Leão Gomes; Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Maria Luiza Anjos Pontual; Flávia Maria Moraes Ramos-Perez; Andrea Dos Anjos Pontual
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 1.882

3.  Revisiting dynamic range and image enhancement ability of contemporary digital radiographic systems.

Authors:  Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira; Luciano Augusto Cano Martins; Deborah Queiroz Freitas; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Matheus L Oliveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Automatic exposure compensation in intraoral digital radiography: effect on the gray values of dental tissues.

Authors:  Evelyn Rute Carneiro Maciel; Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Maria Luiza Dos Anjos Pontual; Andrea Dos Anjos Pontual; Flávia Maria Moraes Ramos-Perez
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 1.930

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.