| Literature DB >> 30540842 |
Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi1,2, Mahdi Najafi3,4.
Abstract
AIMS: Recently, the clinical importance of total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and its protective role against several chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and several types of cancers has been reported. However, its association with cardio-metabolic risk factors among patients candidate for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) has not been evaluated yet. CABG is associated with increased oxidative stress and free radicals; so, the current study was aimed to evaluate the potential association of TAC with cardiovascular risk factors among patients candidate for CABG. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the current cross-sectional study, 454 patients aged 35-80 years as candidates of CABG and hospitalized in Tehran Heart Center were enrolled. Anthropometric and demographic characteristics were obtained from all participants. Total dietary antioxidant capacity (TAC) was calculated according to the findings of semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Biochemical parameters including serum lipids, albumin, creatinine, HbA1C, C-reactive protein (CRP), lipoprotein (a), creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum vitamin D concentrations were also assessed by commercial laboratory methods.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30540842 PMCID: PMC6291249 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of male patients candidate for CABG according to TAC quintiles.
| Quintiles of TAC score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | 1st quintiles | 2nd quintiles | 3rd quintiles | 4th quintiles | 5th quintiles | P value |
| N = 61 | N = 66 | N = 66 | N = 62 | N = 74 | ||
| 60.02±10.51 | 59.88 ±10.07 | 57.68±8.61 | 57.42±9.37 | 58.50±8.56 | 0.38 | |
| 25.84±3.52 | 27.17±2.96 | 26.89±3.69 | 26.36±3.52 | 26.86±3.75 | 0.22 | |
| 20 (32.8) | 19 (28.8) | 25 (37.9) | 23 (37.1) | 22 (29.7) | 0.95 | |
| 25 (41) | 26 (39.4) | 36 (54.5) | 33 (53.2) | 33 (44.6) | 0.32 | |
| 42 (68.9) | 41 (62.1) | 46 (69.7) | 39 (62.9) | 46 (62.2) | 0.5 | |
| 28 (45.9) | 33 (50) | 25 (37.9) | 17 (27.4) | 26 (35.1) | ||
| 31 (51.7) | 31 (47) | 35 (53.8) | 38 (61.3) | 45 (60.8) | 0.09 | |
BMI, body mass index; MI, myocardial Infarction; P value for discrete variables based on Chi-Square Test and for continuous variables based on ANOVA. Discrete and continuous variables data are presented as number (percent) and mean (SD). High educational attainment was defined as educational level more than 12 years.
Baseline characteristics of female patients candidate for CABG according to TAC quintiles.
| Quintiles of TAC score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | 1st quintiles | 2nd quintiles | 3rd quintiles | 4th quintiles | 5th quintiles | P value |
| N = 28 | N = 24 | N = 24 | N = 28 | N = 15 | ||
| 61.79± 8.35 | 57.33 ±6.68 | 59.21± 6.11 | 58.57 ± 6.81 | 60.60± 9.55 | 0.25 | |
| 28.89± 5.38 | 31.30± 4.33 | 28.77 ±4.39 | 29.62± 4.79 | 28.57±3.78 | 0.27 | |
| 19 (67.9) | 18 (75) | 16 (66.7) | 19 (67.9) | 8 (53.3) | 0.37 | |
| 1 (3.6) | 0 | 0 | 2 (7.1) | 0 | 0.81 | |
| 25 (89.3) | 23 (95.8) | 21 (87.5) | 23 (82.1) | 14 (93.3) | 0.61 | |
| 18 (64.3) | 16 (66.7) | 20 (83.3) | 21 (75) | 10 (66.7) | 0.48 | |
| 8 (28.6) | 11 (45.8) | 13 (54.2) | 10 (35.7) | 3 (20) | 0.71 | |
BMI, body mass index; MI, myocardial Infarction; P value for discrete variables based on Chi-Square Test and for continuous variables based on ANOVA. Discrete and continuous variables data are presented as number (percent) and mean (SD). High educational attainment was defined as educational level more than 12 years.
Odd’s ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) for the association between TAC and biochemical variables in male patients candidate for CABG.
| Quintile of TAC score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | 1st quintile | 2nd quintile | 3rd quintile | 4th quintile | 5th quintile |
| N = 61 | N = 66 | N = 66 | N = 62 | N = 74 | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.02 (0.99–1.05) | 0.99 (0.96–1.03) | |||
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.08 (0.87–1.35) | 1.01 (0.81–1.27) | 1.12 (0.90–1.39) | 1.06 (0.86–1.32) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 0.98 (0.95–1.02) | 1.02 (0.98–1.06) | 0.98 (0.95–1.09) | ||
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.00 (0.99–1.002) | 0.99 (0.98–1.002) | 1.01 (0.99–1.01) | 1.01 0.99–1.009) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.02 (0.98–1.05) | 0.98 (0.94–1.02) | 1.01 (0.97–1.04) | 1.02 (0.99–1.06) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.01 (0.95–1.07) | 0.97 (0.92–1.044) | 1.02 (0.96–1.08) | 1.04 (0.98–1.10) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | |||||
| 1 (Ref.) | 2.55 (0.75–8.68) | ||||
| 1 (Ref.) | 0.84 (0.15–4.69) | 0.86 (0.15–4.96) | 0.27 (0.04–1.9) | 1.03 (0.19–5.52) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 0.98 (0.95–1.02) | 0.97 (0.93–1.01) | 0.99 (0.96–1.03) | 0.98 (0.95–1.02) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 0.99 (0.98–1.02) | 1.001 (0.98–1.02) | 1.01 (0.98–1.02) | 0.99 (0.98–1.01) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.02 (0.99–1.13) | 0.92 (0.80–1.06) | 1.01 (0.89–1.12) | 1.02 (0.92–1.12) | |
CI, confidence interval; TAC, total dietary antioxidant capacity; Hb, hemoglobin; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; HCT, hematocrit; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Lp, lipoprotein; CRP, C-reactive protein. The multivariate multinomial logistic regression was used for estimation of ORs and confidence interval (CI) with adjustment for the confounding effects of age, gender, BMI and presence of diabetes and myocardial infarction. Bold digits indicate statistically significant values as P < 0.05.
Odd’s ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) for the association between TAC and biochemical variables in female patients candidate for CABG.
| Quartiles of TAC score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | 1st quartile | 2nd quartile | 3rd quartile | 4th quartile | 5th quintile |
| N = 24 | N = 24 | N = 28 | N = 15 | N = 74 | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 0.94 (0.90–0.99) | 0.99 (0.95–1.04) | 0.99 (0.95–1.04) | 0.94 (0.89–0.99) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.17 (0.76–1.81) | 0.93 (0.59–1.43) | 0.97(0.64–1.47) | 0.80 (0.48–1.34) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.37 (0.84–2.24) | 1.31 (0.79–2.15) | 1.35 (0.83–2.21) | 1.31 (0.78–2.21) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 0.93 (0.85–1.03) | 0.95 (0.85–1.05) | 0.94 (0.85–1.03) | 0.94 (0.85–1.05) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 0.71 (0.45–1.68) | 0.75 (0.45–1.24) | 0.73 (0.45–1.20) | 0.75 (0.44–1.26) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 0.71 (0.44–1.61) | 0.80 (0.48–1.31) | 0.75 (0.46–1.23) | 0.73 (0.44–1.26) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.11 (0.89–1.40) | 1.01 (0.81–1.24) | 1 (0.80–1.25) | 1.05 (0.82–1.35) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 3.85 (0.45–33.20) | 0.2 (0.02–1.55) | 0.83 (0.13–5.53) | 1.27 (0.12–12.16) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 0.22(0.002–20.82) | 0.58 (0.01–32.15) | 0.02 (0–3.58) | ||
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.07 (0.99–1.15) | 1.07 (0.98–1.15) | 1.03 (0.95–1.03) | 1.01 (0.92–1.10) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.01 (0.98–1.03) | 0.99 (0.96–1.07) | 1.01(0.99–1.03) | 1.02 (0.99–1.04) | |
| 1 (Ref.) | 1.02 (0.86–1.2) | 1.11 (0.94–1.31) | 0.84 (0.63–1.12) | 0.84 (0.55–1.28) | |
CI, confidence interval; TAC, total dietary antioxidant capacity; Hb, hemoglobin; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; HCT, hematocrit; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Lp, lipoprotein; CRP, C-reactive protein. The multivariate multinomial logistic regression was used for estimation of ORs and confidence interval (CI) with adjustment for the confounding effects of age, gender, BMI and presence of diabetes and myocardial infarction. Bold digits indicate statistically significant values as P < 0.05.
Fig 1European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) in patients according to TAC quintiles; no significant difference was observed.
Fig 4Number of diseased vessels in patients according to TAC quintiles; no significant difference between different quintiles of TAC has been observed.