Literature DB >> 30540368

Long-term Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study.

Mohammad-Reza Sedaghat, Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam, Renato Ambrósio, Cynthia J Roberts, Abbas-Ali Yekta, Zeynab Danesh, Sven Reisdorf, Mehdi Khabazkhoob, Hamid-Reza Heidari, Javad Sadeghi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term changes in corneal biomechanics, topography, and tomography before and 4 years after corneal cross-linking (CXL) with the Dresden protocol and correlate these changes with visual acuity.
METHODS: In this longitudinal study, 18 eyes of 18 patients with progressive keratoconus who were treated with CXL were included. All patients received a standard ophthalmological examination and were examined by Placido disc-based topography, Scheimpflug tomography, and biomechanical assessments with the Corvis ST (OCULUS Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) before and 4 years after CXL. The main outcome measures were dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters obtained from the Corvis ST, corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), visual acuity, refraction, corneal curvature, and corneal thickness.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in mean visual acuity, refraction, intraocular pressure, corneal topography, corneal astigmatism in both corneal surfaces, maximum keratometry, corneal thickness at apical and thinnest points, thickness profile indices, corneal volume, and specular microscopy before and 4 years after CXL (P > .05). Significant changes were observed in many DCR parameters, including radius at highest concavity and integrated inverse radius, both of which were consistent with stiffening. The CH and CRF values after CXL were not statistically significant. The new parameters using the Corvis ST include integrated inverse concave radius, which showed a significant decrease 1.07 ± 0.93 mm-1, consistent with stiffening. The corneal stiffness parameter at the first applanation, Ambrósio's Relational Thickness to the horizontal profile, deformation amplitude ratio, and Corvis Biomechanical Index as a combined biomechanical screening parameter did not show significant changes.
CONCLUSIONS: CXL is a minimally invasive treatment option to prevent keratoconus progression over 4 years. Pressure-derived biomechanical parameters obtained from the ORA did not show any change following CXL at 4 years of follow-up, whereas the Corvis ST DCR parameters detected changes in corneal biomechanical properties. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(12):849-856.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30540368     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20181012-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of corneal biological parameters between transepithelial and epithelium-off corneal cross-linking in keratoconus.

Authors:  Bo-Wen Ouyang; Hui Ding; Han Wang; Zhen-Duo Yang; Tan Zhong; Hong-Ming Fan; Xing-Wu Zhong
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Evaluation of Corvis ST tonometer with the updated software in glaucoma practice.

Authors:  Ioannis Halkiadakis; Vasilios Tzimis; Alexandros Gryparis; Ioannis Markopoulos; Vasiliki Konstadinidou; Elias Zintzaras; Michalis Tzakos
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Anterior pituitary, sex hormones, and keratoconus: Beyond traditional targets.

Authors:  Dimitrios Karamichos; Paulina Escandon; Brenda Vasini; Sarah E Nicholas; Lyly Van; Deanna H Dang; Rebecca L Cunningham; Kamran M Riaz
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 19.704

Review 4.  Advances in Biomechanical Parameters for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part III.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Mahsaw N Motlagh; Michael S Murri; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

5.  Comparison of waveform-derived corneal stiffness and stress-strain extensometry-derived corneal stiffness using different cross-linking irradiances: an experimental study with air-puff applanation of ex vivo porcine eyes.

Authors:  Robert Herber; Mathew Francis; Eberhard Spoerl; Lutz E Pillunat; Frederik Raiskup; Abhijit Sinha Roy
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Association between Corneal Stiffness Parameter at the First Applanation and Keratoconus Severity.

Authors:  Kaili Yang; Liyan Xu; Qi Fan; Shengwei Ren
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  The Role of Corneal Biomechanics in the Assessment of Ectasia Susceptibility Before Laser Vision Correction.

Authors:  Pedro Manuel Baptista; Ana Ambrósio Marta; João Heitor Marques; Ana Carolina Abreu; Sílvia Monteiro; Pedro Menéres; Maria do Céu Pinto
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-19

8.  One-Year Follow-Up of Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Accelerated Transepithelial Corneal Cross-Linking in Pediatric Patients With Progressive Keratoconus.

Authors:  Weijun Jian; Mi Tian; Xiaoyu Zhang; Ling Sun; Yang Shen; Meiyan Li; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-07

9.  The Role of Corneal Biomechanics for the Evaluation of Ectasia Patients.

Authors:  Marcella Q Salomão; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte; Bernardo Lopes; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Paolo Vinciguerra; Jens Bühren; Nelson Sena; Guilherme Simões Luz Hilgert; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Biomechanical diagnostics of the cornea.

Authors:  Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte; Marcella Q Salomão; Bernardo T Lopes; Paolo Vinciguerra; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Cynthia Roberts; Ahmed Elsheikh; Daniel G Dawson; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.